Aberforth
The Internationalist
Re: ***science Or God?***
I am sorry to say, you are wrong to assume exploration of mysteries in the universe means a study of cosmology. Cosmology is the study of universe as 'cosmos' or space. Universe consists of subatomic particles to living beings to giant galaxies which puts all branches of science under the purview of universe. It is mentally stimulating and gratifying to unravel and delve into these mysteries for a scientist, to the point of being addictive. Confusion and skepticism is only for the intellectually blunt: doubts are for the intelligents. The mysteries of the universe aren't confusing, they just become clearer once they are understood.
Causality is an idea, a philosophy and not an exact science per se and it can't be used to existence of god. If you refer to use of causality in science, the universe existed because of the seperation of matter and anti-matter and conversion of matter into energy. If god was the cause then what is the origin and cause of god's existence? And using you logic and causality, I could prove Santa Claus comes to my backyard, tooth fairy exists, I am immortal....blah blah... Plus Bible and Gita are all human written books of philosophy and they have been often been found mistaken (human errors) in other spheres that their claim of god in incredible - normal humans made these texts.
Yamaraj said:And by the way, you're wrong about exploring the Universe and getting satisfaction from it. From what I know about cosmology, the more we know about the Universe, the less satisfying it is. And more confusing, of course!
I am sorry to say, you are wrong to assume exploration of mysteries in the universe means a study of cosmology. Cosmology is the study of universe as 'cosmos' or space. Universe consists of subatomic particles to living beings to giant galaxies which puts all branches of science under the purview of universe. It is mentally stimulating and gratifying to unravel and delve into these mysteries for a scientist, to the point of being addictive. Confusion and skepticism is only for the intellectually blunt: doubts are for the intelligents. The mysteries of the universe aren't confusing, they just become clearer once they are understood.
cyberboy_kerala said:First cause(Etiological ) proof can be stated as follows:
1. Everything that exists or begins to exist has a cause.
> yes even for small events has a cause,for example a falling leaf has a cause behind it may be a wind or something else,power cut u know something is causing it,like this every small, even a motion of electron has a cause behind it.
2. The universe exists and began to exist.
> everyone knows it exist ,there must be a cause which has no cause behind it , something familiar isn't?
3. The universe must have a cause.
>come up with a event that has no cause behind it, u can't
4. The cause of the universe is God.
>why not ,universe need a first cause,and universe still exist, for universe to exist there must be a cause...it must be eternal....all things start from this first cause....sound's familiar...yes for long time now holly books like Geetha,bible r saying in a simple way that people could understand.
THERE MUST BE ATLEAST A SUPERPOWER ABOVE ALL
Causality is an idea, a philosophy and not an exact science per se and it can't be used to existence of god. If you refer to use of causality in science, the universe existed because of the seperation of matter and anti-matter and conversion of matter into energy. If god was the cause then what is the origin and cause of god's existence? And using you logic and causality, I could prove Santa Claus comes to my backyard, tooth fairy exists, I am immortal....blah blah... Plus Bible and Gita are all human written books of philosophy and they have been often been found mistaken (human errors) in other spheres that their claim of god in incredible - normal humans made these texts.
Last edited: