*** Science Or God? ***

Science or God?


  • Total voters
    517

whitestar_999

Super Moderator
Staff member
Happiness lowers blood pressure

btw just to make it interesting,those who say mahabharat happened here in earlier times must also accept that our Sun(aka surya) is eternal which we know for a fact is not.It is just like any other star & will die after around 5 billion years from now or much sooner than that if humanity develops star destroying weapons.
 

Raaabo

The Dark Lord
Staff member
Admin
Slave to chemistry is just my way of saying we misinterpret chemical reactions in our brains, and instead of trying to understand those reactions, we fall prey to fears and start believing things by taking leaps of "faith" which our brains allow us to, which is again, just more chemistry, and then argue about it being reality, when in fact it's fiction based on even more fiction!

Sorry if I've confused you further... I hope not though. Right now I'm a slave to my son's brain chemistry, and perhaps not thinking as clearly as I'd like ;)
 

doomgiver

Warframe
so are you assuming that the part of you that "falls or interprets or not thinking clearly" is not a chemistry ? and if it is then why call it slavery ? drop of water cannot drown in sea , electricity cannot get shock by electricity and so on...

Do you know when you see a hot girl, its your hormones that cause it. Hormones = chemistry.

Brain impulses are transmitted via small electric shocks thru axons. How do these impulses move? Sodium (Na) ion are pumped thru the axons, thus creating a negative/positive charge disbalance, effectively "pushing" or "pulling" forward the impulse. Thats chemistry.

Everything around us is, at the cellular/molecular level, all due to chemistry. Thats why he says, we're all slaves to chemistry.
 

Raaabo

The Dark Lord
Staff member
Admin
ahh good that i asked, your passage indicates that "falling prey to fears" and word "slave" and "we misinterpret" you are seperating that conscious part ( the experiencer, the interpreter ) of your brain from other things like fears , faith , belief etc... right ?

so are you assuming that the part of you that "falls or interprets or not thinking clearly" is not a chemistry ? and if it is then why call it slavery ? drop of water cannot drown in sea , electricity cannot get shock by electricity and so on...

It's all chemistry. Some is in moderate control - exercise and you create a feeling, do something you know you like and you get pleasure, etc. - but most isn't.

Logic and mathematics and the sciences in general bring more explanations for the world, and thus reduce irrationality. Whilst our ancestors would be terrified of something, today we accept it, this is how we rely less on the subconscious and more on the conscious brain. It's all just chemistry still, but more controlled reactions rather than chaos. The more you learn, the more controlled the chemistry - at least that's my theory.

And before you try and disprove it, first consider this: I could make you anything from manic depressed, ecstatically happy and even extremely horny. Using just pills, I could modify conscious and also sub-conscious you. If that's not proof of chemistry, what is?
 

rish1

Cyborg Agent
why so many people believe in either science or god or both, and are willing to just ignore logic. And yes, there are a lot of science believers who ignore logic too... if it's science, and some smart guy said it, it must be true, and unquestionable, when in fact all that science is, is questioning everything.
Bingo ... we are on the same page

very well replied sir without resorting to any personal attacks so kudos for that .. i'll try to tell as i understand it but before discussing let me again repeat i am not debating and most of the stuff i write could make me look like believer but actually i try to keep out of any sort of belief or faith stuff and have written it in my previous posts as well..

I haven't read previous posts no. However I've had years of experience talking about this with many people so I've heard all the usual arguments.

"Millions" is an extrapolation or exaggeration usually. And easily countered with billions who don't experience what people claim.

Stuff like "telepathy" may very well turn out to be something the subconscious mind is capable of. It's still science. However, it's still better to use logic and science to allow testing and confirmation of such things. As you say it yourself, being repeatable in a controlled environment is essential, and it's not happening thus far. As for "mainstream" science, that's kind of a misnomer. It has to be accepted with tests for it to be scientific. You make science sound like some cult.

i am not speaking out of logic infact after reading your last statement i feel we are on the same page..
ok 1st point .. if you assume it exists then you have to bring in a possibility of a universal field or some sort of quantum entanglement .. because the electric charges produced by brain aren't powerful enough to be able to broadcast that signal and even if it were created by brain it would be limited to very small and very close ranges..
it isn't in mainstream science yet that is why it isn't well accepted .. you can read up the research done by dean radin , tom campbell, Pear institute , rhine institute , rupert sheldrake , Stargate Project , Research done by Sony and many more.. but they aren't well accepted in mainstream yet like i said before due to repeatability issues and hard to control ability , not accurate everytime.. but that doesn't mean there aren't any positive results..
How does confirmation bias become an invalid argument with near death experiences? The term is "near death" and not after death experiences. The phrase you're using itself is invalid by suggesting the brain is dead during a near death experience. Resuscitations have happened hours after the heart has stopped, but the person was considered still alive, not dead, thus the attempt to resuscitate.

Most near death experiences are probably the brain continuing to receive stimulus when in a subconscious or coma state, thus bringing images together a little randomly to form surreal images.

You actually do this all the time, it's called dreaming. The few times you're awakened during REM sleep and have a vivid recollection of a dream, you will see that it's usually fantastic or improbable or weird. Dreams are almost NEVER in tune with reality. You will dream of your mum, at breakfast, but the house isn't your own. Sometimes it can be weird. You get all the same feelings as you would if it was your mum, but it's your second grade teacher, or your dad in a dress, if you happened to watch Mrs Doubtfire, for example, before sleeping.

This happens DAILY to most people, and yet we marvel at someone saying "I saw a white light" or "I was floating above watching the scene of my dead body"? Surely we should have more respect for the brain than that...

ahh now i see.. you are having totally wrong understanding here..

when the heart stops .. there is no more oxygen going to brain .. the instant after heart stops the brain is able to display some activity for only upto 10-30 sec ( simple analogy like when you switch off tv.. pixels remain activated for a few seconds after electricity has stopped and we see the prints of image left for few secs ) and then it goes flatlined with 0 brain activity.. the person is actually in a death state .. if you leave that person like that he is dead and not alive .. and that is why it is called
"Clinical Death"
when they perform resuscitation they jumpstart the heart again and the brain gets oxygen and start to function again .. that is why resuscitation has only limits of some hours before the individual cells starts dying .. you can't leave a person in that state and do resuscitation after days.. if he was alive in that state even with some activity there would be no problem in actually performing resuscitation after days and months.. its actually bringing person to life from death..

the argument of dream / coma state is totally invalid as even in those states brain is functioning and displaying activity and hence possible to create illusions , imagery ,

while in a 0 brain function state it is not possible to create any imagery or have any sort of unconscious experience as per brain = consciousness theory

so those people who used to say i saw light , i am over my body .. it was assumed that those images were illusions created by brain in that 10-30 sec period before brain stops functioning.. but but but it has been objectively proven in many cases that at the time when the brain function was 0 most people had awareness and not only that they were actually able to see and listen and describe every event that was happening in that room accurately .. the eyes were closed and ears not functioning and the details were later confirmed by doctors and nurses present in the room .. please give an explanation for this .. ohh and also remember these people are heavily drugged before so even a normal person when he is drugged, senses have a hard time in functioning properly let alone a drugged person ..

then these people report that they were more "ALIVE" in this state and totally change their lives and personality around after having those experiences.. any dream or illusion cannot move this person this much that they become totally different person.. a smoker or drinker due to fear of death might change habits to live more but total personality changes like donating up wealth, while earlier some of them used to be mean people afterwards they start helping other , do more public service and become compassionate people , totally atheist and materialist people start becoming religious etc .. and the best part these people loose the "Fear of death" and become much more peaceful and happy..

as for the term "Near death" yes its a wrong term , its an old term coined quite earlier and many have told to change it as well.. more appropriate is out of body experience .. the near death experiences causes one to have an out of body experience

As for slaves to chemistry, every example you've given as a counter is a chemistry example. Your mistake is not looking at the human body and brain as a chemical process. Sadness is a change in chemistry, as is happiness. You get hyper aware when scared, that's chemistry. I quit smoking without medications because my doctor told me I'd die if I didn't, in as little as a year. I went from 40 a day to nothing, and that was a chemical change in my body brought about by fear.

wow thats great you have been through that experience and i can understand why you hold on to that notion of slavery..

sadness is a chemical process but what causes sadness ? but what allowed you to have fear to begin the chemical process of FEAR ?

Do you know when you see a hot girl,

i was deliberately trying to come up to this point
leave out the rest explanation tell me which chemical "decides or makes that decision" to see or imagine that hot girl ?

when i raise up my hand , certain part of the brain stimulates and sends an electrical charge to my hand to move muscles and that makes it rise up

when i cut and open the brain and stimulate the same part of brain through an electrode my muscles move and my hand rises up but still i am not the one raising it up .. why ?

if i was a chemical slave wouldn't giving the same chemical or electrical charge to my brain externally make me raise up my hand ?

yet it does not make me do it..

you claim that you are a chemical slave .. where is your proof ? its just a theory

consciousness inside the brain is just a theory without any proof !!! and yes scientists have explored all the parts of brain for so many years and tried stimulating every part of it yet they are unable to find the one who is controlling the brain ?

and all the NDE evidence is AGAINST that theory

It's all chemistry. Some is in moderate control - exercise and you create a feeling, do something you know you like and you get pleasure, etc. - but most isn't.

Logic and mathematics and the sciences in general bring more explanations for the world, and thus reduce irrationality. Whilst our ancestors would be terrified of something, today we accept it, this is how we rely less on the subconscious and more on the conscious brain. It's all just chemistry still, but more controlled reactions rather than chaos. The more you learn, the more controlled the chemistry - at least that's my theory.

And before you try and disprove it, first consider this: I could make you anything from manic depressed, ecstatically happy and even extremely horny. Using just pills, I could modify conscious and also sub-conscious you. If that's not proof of chemistry, what is?

yes you can make me depressed happy or any feeling by giving pills and drugs.. BUT BUT BUT you cannot make me choose anything i don't want .. even in case of torture / fear or drugging me with anything i would still have to consciously at some level choose myself .. you can't do it .. not at all..

point a gun at me .. i may choose it to do it for you because i value life more than whatever you are asking me to do or i can choose to die ..
drug me with pills and make me fearful and depressed .. i might commit suicide but i will still choose that decision myself to get away from the feelings of depressions and fearfullness
give electric stimulation to my brain and you can raise my hand but i didn't raise it .. and you didn't made me do it
you cannot control consciousness .. you can distort it , influence it , fool it , but you can't control it..

even in cases of schizophrenia or any other mental diseases
these people have consciousness but they are so blinded by their hallucinations , distorted experience, they are out of touch with reality and are in their own world ..
The placebo effect is exactly that, the use of brain chemistry to heal minor ailments especially pain and other brain controlled ailments.

Minor treatments ? really ? what about the guy who needed to have an arthritis surgery .. doctors try to run an experiment with him, gave him fake surgery ( made a cut and stitch it back without performing any surgery )
fooled that guy, that he was being given a real surgery and surprisingly the guy magically heals ? and what above those Countless "Miracles" where people were supposed to die due to cancer , tumors and those stage 4 cancers magically just disappear ?

Most people were given up by Science in many incurable diseases and when they try out accupunture or any other alternate healing they healed ..

you can google it up if you want to all of them are in medical literature...

The same for the self mutilating people. Chemistry. The same effects as anaesthesia are possible by internal chemistry. This bloodless piercing I have not seen, unless you mean inserting into cavities such as the nose or sword swallowing. Give links to reputed sites for such claims please.

watch it on superhumans for demonstration :p :lol: ohh and if you think its due to some gene .. almost all buddhists monks can do this and not only this they can increase their body temperatures enough to evaporate wet sheets at will .. slow their heart beats, pulse etc some can even stop that at will and achieve a flatline of brain with 0 activity

again are we slaves of chemistry ?

Whether you like it or not, Buddhism, hinduism, Chinese whatever are religions now. I see enough people dancing on the streets and also killing over them to prove that they're religions and not some health manual.

The probability of a person continuing to follow the religion he is brainwashed into from birth is actually very high. Way higher than people converting or becoming atheists.

As for thousands of years, most religions are thousands of years old, and ridiculous. Look at the religions you criticise themselves, they're also thousands of years old and contain talking burning bushes and whatnot, and they survived thousands of years, in fact they're way bigger than Buddhism or other fringe religions and GROWING in popularity. The statement you made is a wrong assumption as you underestimate human stupidity. And please don't start a new stupid religion, there are enough as it is.

Also, please don't be selective, you take yoga, and make that out to be the entire religion. That's just a bunch of exercises, and everyone's known for thousands of years that getting fat and not exercising kills you faster. Yoga is great, so is running, jogging, cycling, swimming, etc.

you are totally misinformed here what do you think yoga is ? a bunch of exercises to reduce weight ?

its hardly physical and almost all of it is mental ...

you should read this

*www.swamij.com/pdf/swami-rama-beyond-biofeedback.pdf

As for ancient batteries, you're watching too many ancient aliens episodes or reading von daniken or something. Most of these "theories" don't stand the test of scientific scrutiny and have been disproven already.

There are people who are crazy enough to recreate the slabs of stones using tools only available back then in Egypt. What we don't have is their patience or all powerful kings who can behead you for not complying.

"describes fine scenery in its details that no fiction tale of modern day writers can match or write up a similar story"

You're kidding, right? Have you read science fiction from Asimov and Clarke, have you read Dune?

Please quote in original sanskrit where the nuclear wars are described and radiation, etc. Next you'll tell me there are equations in it that help you build your own reactor at home...

Just as you can sit around and find shapes in clouds, people find what they want to see in things they don't truly understand.

"The vedas know all the secrets of the universe." - I have heard this many times.



Think about it logically, if you're saying that there were nuclear wars back then, wouldn't there be remnants of it to show? Wouldn't there be ONE warhead lying somewhere, perhaps buried under a city that was destroyed, and thus show up now? Shouldn't there be knowhow of making such warheads passed on from generation to generation. I would assume this talent would be way more prestigious than, say, making sandals. Wouldn't the ancient cities revel in victory and carve out mushroom clouds on their walls?

As for flight imagination. Surely you jest. Every single ancient civilisation "imagined" flight in some fantastic form or the other. Some imagined eagle-men hybrids, some humans with wings, Icarus and whatnot, and some imagined flying "vimana" which are everything from flying palaces, to chariots and even just a bird on whom a god rides.

Ever sat around a village gathering, and seen how word spreads? Take something simple, and tell them that in London, a man was arrested for killing and eating his girlfriend. Come back after a week and you will hear someone tell a story of how the zombie apocalypse has begun in England and everyone is eating everyone. Fantasy and exaggeration is as human as greed and desire.

Is it not possible that what started as one story teller talking about a god that rides a pigeon was retold as riding a hawk, then a chariot that flies, and eventually became a god who's whole army flies about in flying palaces? Knowing human tendency you really argue against that being a very real possibility, and in fact, the most probable and logical explanation?

sir you are mistaking me as some kind of "blind faith religious fanboy" and i can assure you i am anything but that .. did i even say anywhere that i believe in Mahabharat and it knows all secrets ?

look at the replies
"too much ancient aliens" "von daniken"

did i mention anything about aliens ? how has it been disproven ? were those discovery of ancient batteries fake or made up story ? if those batteries are real doesn't that imply they knew a good amount of stuff ? whats not logical about it ?

have they figured out how did they create egyptian pyramids with precise precision with only simple tools ? i am assuming you will be mistaking me on this part as well

no i am not saying aliens did it , neither a god did it..

i am saying its simple magnetism and other laws which we don't understand today which they had knowledge...

How do i know that "because around 80 years ago 1 guy claimed he knew how they built it and it was due to magnetism and as a proof he built 1"

its logical to assume what he said was right until further evidence is found that disproves it

this one is for you @whitestar999 buddy if that post was pointed at me if not then apologies please ignore it..

the only point i was making that "not all ancient people were dumb and stupid" .. thats all.. imagining all of that in that time period would have been a great intellectual accomplishment .. i don't even believe in stuff that i am writing until i get further proofs/evidence for myself and why do you think i will believe a story which although has good evidence that it could have been real.. things like discovery of dwaraka remains and saraswati river which were considered myths 20-30 years ago..
that gives it a good probability of using real places but it doesn't gives any proof or certainity in what is written in it was true or not , it could be that they used real places and made up a fiction story and if it is not even provable then why waste time believing in whether its real or not.. however the moral of that story , does interest me, because its something practical and usable ...

A religion you may not be able to start, but I guarantee you, if you set your mind to it, and write out passages with a lot of complex teems and a creative license that almost sounds like gibberish, eventually someone will start finding "meaning" in it.

yes but you did not answer my question if i write a bunch of fake practical exercises with some creative theory that why those exercises will work and make claims that "if you follow these exercises they will give you X result"

would that religion last ? whole buddhism , chi gong , yoga is like that .. do you know what buddhism is ? they have not renounced everything just to pray to some imaginary being or a statue and are driven by chemical locha.. its a bunch of exercises to expand your mind and consciousness to give you proof your conscious Mind and Body are seperate..

how long would that religion last ? tell me if those exercises were not working for people ? if you think that somehow that religion or tradition might still hold up for centuries thats not based on any sort of chemical fear/theory/need to believe/fooling people then i am sorry that's not logical in my books..

i would suggest please go through my previous posts as i have repeated the same things which i raised in my previous posts..and sincere apologies sir to you or doomgiver or whitestar if any of you felt any sort of personal attack in my posts .. that wasn't my intention at all

i am really confused reading ur post,which u side r u in?

if you read my posts i am on neither side.. because there are major holes in religions , as we all know it and there are enough holes in current mainstream scientific model of reality as well ..

so lets just say i am an open minded outsider , wherever that leads me .. ;)



- - - Updated - - -

Chinese called it chi
indians called it prana
in year 2050 it will be as widely accepted as quantum physics is today and will be called orgone ..

Chi Life Force Energy - Wilhelm Reich ****** MUST SEE ****** - YouTube

WILHELM REICH'S BION-BIOGENESIS DISCOVERIES - EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION - YouTube

In December 1940 Reich wrote to Albert Einstein saying he had a scientific discovery he wanted to discuss, and in January 1941 visited Einstein at his home in Princeton, where they talked for nearly five hours. He told Einstein that he had discovered a "specific biologically effective energy which behaves in many respects differently to all that is known about electromagnetic energy." He said it could be used against disease, and as a weapon "in the fight against the Fascist pestilence." (Einstein had signed a letter to President Roosevelt in August 1939 to warn of the danger of Nazi Germany building an atom bomb, and had urged the United States to set up its own research project.) Einstein agreed that if an object's temperature could be raised without an apparent heating source, as Reich was suggesting, it would be "a bomb."[96]

Reich was much encouraged by the meeting and hoped he would be invited to join Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study.[96] During their next meeting he gave Einstein a small accumulator, and over the next 10 days Einstein performed experiments with it in his basement, which involved taking the temperature above, inside and near the device, and stripping it down to its Faraday cage to compare temperatures. He observed a rise in temperature, which Reich argued was caused by orgone.[97] One of Einstein's assistants pointed out that the temperature was lower on the floor than on the ceiling.[98] Einstein concluded that the effect was simply due to the temperature gradient inside the room. "Through these experiments I regard the matter as completely solved," he wrote to Reich on 7 February 1941.[99]

Reich responded with a 25-page letter in which he tried to change Einstein's mind.[100] To rule out the influence of convection he told Einstein he had introduced a horizontal plate above the accumulator, wrapped it in a blanket, suspended it freely in the room, buried it underground and placed it outside. He wrote that in all these circumstances the temperature difference remained, and was in fact more marked in the open air.[101] Einstein did not respond to this or to Reich's future correspondence – Reich would write regularly reporting the results of his experiments – until Reich threatened three years later to publish their previous exchange. Einstein replied that he could not devote any further time to the matter and asked that his name not be misused for advertising purposes. Reich believed that Einstein's change of heart was part of a conspiracy of some kind, perhaps related to the communists, or prompted by the rumours that Reich was ill. Reich published the correspondence in 1953 as The Einstein Affair

An introduction to Measuring Orgone Energy - YouTube

anyways looks like i wrote a mahabharata myself in this post :lol:.. its consuming my time too much , wasted 5 hours on this :(.. can we delete our ids
 
Last edited:
Reincarnation incidents
[h=1]3-Year-Old Remembers Past Life, Identifies Murderer and Location of Body[/h]Link

- - - Updated - - -

"I Have Lived Before": The Reincarnation of Shanti Devi
Link
Shanti Devi wouldn't give up. She talked about her former family to anyone who would listen. One of her teachers at school sent a letter to the address Shanti Devi gave as her "real home" in Mathura, inquiring if a woman who had died there not too many years ago. To his astonishment, he soon received a reply from Shanti Devi's previous husband, admitting that his young wife Lugdi Devi had passed away some years previously, after giving birth to their son. The details Shanti Devi had given about her old house and members of her previous family were all confirmed.
 

Anorion

Sith Lord
Staff member
Admin
^Scared Mother: Is there a ghost inside my child?” | WTKR.com

Michele wanted to find out what were these memories - and Andrew gave her some very specific clues.

“He kept saying he lived at 860 Main Street in Sumter, Georgia,” Michele says.

...

That family decided to go to Georgia and visit the gravesite where Sgt. Lewis was buried to see if it would give Andrew some closure and close the door on the past memories.

“He went right up to the gravesite, he was okay. Put the flowers down and then he took off and ran to another grave and it was a marine and he said, ‘That’s my friend,’” Michele recalled.
 

whitestar_999

Super Moderator
Staff member
This should put all pyramid super construction theories to rest:
Ancient Egyptians transported pyramid stones over wet sand

This should put anybody's fancy about returning from zero brain activity to rest.
Brain Death
There are no well-documented cases of a correct diagnosis of brain death in which the patient has had any meaningful recovery. While the media will sometimes report such a case, further investigation reveals a misstep in the diagnosis, meaning the patient should not have been declared brain dead at all.

Clinical death
Although loss of function is almost immediate, there is no specific duration of clinical death at which the non-functioning brain clearly dies. The most vulnerable cells in the brain, CA1 neurons of the hippocampus, are fatally injured by as little as 10 minutes without oxygen. However, the injured cells do not actually die until hours after resuscitation.[8] This delayed death can be prevented in vitro by a simple drug treatment even after 20 minutes without oxygen.[9] In other areas of the brain, viable human neurons have been recovered and grown in culture hours after clinical death.[10] Brain failure after clinical death is now known to be due to a complex series of processes (reperfusion injury) that occur after blood circulation is restored, especially processes that interfere with blood circulation during the recovery period.[11] Control of these processes is the subject of ongoing research.
What it means is that even several minutes after onset of clinical death there is still some active brain cells or in other words anyone who recovered from clinical death did it with some % of brain still functioning,there is no recovery once 100% brain cells are dead.
[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION],your arguments,though fascinating, are just not good enough to stand any serious scientific scrutiny as you can see in above examples so my suggestion is either prove them by doing something yourself(like become a neurosurgeon to prove consciousness independent of brain chemistry) or just state your beliefs without giving weak statements in support.It is better to be known as a believer without arguments compared to a believer with false/weak arguments.
 

snap

Lurker
There was a pretty funny comment i found on reddit about the people who spew random pseudo-science BS and cherry picking to validate their beliefs;

"No, you do not understand the meta-relativistic cognitive understanding of psuedo-quantum parallel entanglements that manifest as the inherent phenomena of neuronal processing vis-a-vis the hyper-consciousness of sentience. Scientists have shown that the underlying matrices of unilateral sixth-dimensional omni-strings are vibrating in sympathetic connections with the oscillating wave function that is the soul's chakra output, correlating directly with the chi expulsion of each person's tantric whosiwhatits, and culminating with the somethingorother of quantumhypermetaprefixaffixsuffixfractalmathwordssciencejargontechnobabble. So you see, that's why whatever bullshit I'm arguing in favor of is completely true."
 

Anorion

Sith Lord
Staff member
Admin
[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION] found something for you
Human thoughts used to switch on genes - life - 11 November 2014 - New Scientist

It's not as out there as it sounds, now the technical foundations have been laid. Researchers have created a link between thoughts and cells, allowing people to switch on genes in mice using just their thoughts.

Im guessing that if scientists do not discover telepathy, they will just invent it
 

rish1

Cyborg Agent
you are misunderstanding what i am saying...

This should put all pyramid super construction theories to rest:
Ancient Egyptians transported pyramid stones over wet sand

sorry i have read it before it proves nothing .. it only proves how they might have moved it .. please how did they cut the stones with precise laser like precision with simple tools and how did they put it all together with perfect harmony and this does not explain how did coral castle was built by edward alone who was so thin.. he alone himself cut those giant blocks of stones , and put it all together with great precision .. it was 80 years ago and he wouldn't have been able to do it with any modern tech .. so this proves nothing it only explains how they might have moved it..

This should put anybody's fancy about returning from zero brain activity to rest.
Brain Death


Clinical death

What it means is that even several minutes after onset of clinical death there is still some active brain cells or in other words anyone who recovered from clinical death did it with some % of brain still functioning,there is no recovery once 100% brain cells are dead.

you are again misunderstanding here.. brain death is totally different than clinical death ..

At the onset of clinical death, consciousness is lost within several seconds. Measurable brain activity stops within 20 to 40 seconds.[2] Irregular gasping may occur during this early time period, and is sometimes mistaken by rescuers as a sign that CPR is not necessary.[3] During clinical death, all tissues and organs in the body steadily accumulate a type of injury called ischemic injury.

Clinical death - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

when clinical death happens the brain function /activity stops after 10-30 secs .. that does not mean brain is dead .. it stops functioning , it can't do anything there is no electricity charges produced anymore.. no electrical activity means no imaging , no illusions , nothing is possible .. but individual cells that form brain are still alive .. and is still possible to revive the brain activity and hence they perform resuscitation its not final death.. its like going downhill from there if you don't revive that person, slowly brain cells start dying and then after certain period if resuscitation has not been performed it will be final death.. no recovery possible

Brain Death is irreversible loss of brain function while clinical death is reversible loss of brain function .. that does not mean brain is functioning in clinical death ( after 30-40 sec ) .. its in a suspended state .. while in coma/dream brain is functioning and displaying electrical activity..

Brain death is the Final Death/legal death .. that is no resuscitation possible at all..

please understand what i am saying ..

[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION],your arguments,though fascinating, are just not good enough to stand any serious scientific scrutiny as you can see in above examples so my suggestion is either prove them by doing something yourself(like become a neurosurgeon to prove consciousness independent of brain chemistry) or just state your beliefs without giving weak statements in support.It is better to be known as a believer without arguments compared to a believer with false/weak arguments.

what serious scientific scrutiny are you talking about ? you didn't explained or refuted anything .. what weak/ false arguments ? you are giving weak/false arguments with wrong understanding .. you are holding on to a belief in" scientific dogma " not science , science is the study of patterns .. science will never stay the same .. 100 years from now the whole philosophy will be different and there will be a new understanding and a new dogma based on findings and experimentation

like i said before i am outsider out of any belief .. explain the points raised by me and i will have no problem in accepting your explanation if it sounds logical .. even the egyptian theory i am talking about i specifically stated i will hold on to that explanation until further evidence is found to disprove it .. i never said i am a believer in that theory and that is the only explanation...

as for proving , i have said it before i am not here to prove anyone anything , i am not debating here just discussing and that too believe it or not was for my own understanding as it got me involved in researching these topics more .. you are free to have your beliefs as you like .. if you consider me a believer/ religious baba / pseudoscientific or any other term you are free to do as you like, i really don't care... anyways i am sensing some uneasiness here so don't worry won't be posting here it was only due to rabooo sir beautiful written post that i thought discussing with him would be nice.. you are free to delete posts/my id :)

good luck

take care


- - - Updated - - -

[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION] found something for you
Human thoughts used to switch on genes - life - 11 November 2014 - New Scientist

Im guessing that if scientists do not discover telepathy, they will just invent it

thanks buddy .. i think its already possible with current technology ;)

*www.vox.com/2014/11/9/7181029/telepathy-brain-communication .. i think this will become very big in the near future ..

multiplayer gaming with telepathy in a virtual reality environment would be SUPER EPIC !! :D
 
Last edited:

whitestar_999

Super Moderator
Staff member
What more do you want,Stephen Hawking to personally give you a written proof?I gave you links(mainstream science & not some fringe para research) contradicting several of your claims(pyramid,zero brain function recovery).Neither you nor anyone here is a MS nureosurgeon or Phd Quantum Mechanics so both you & others can only give arguments based on work of others & clearly you don't have the advantage in that area(in your own words mainstream science outweigh fringe science).Science will never stay the same does not mean you can say everything science teaches today is wrong.

like i said before i am outsider out of any belief .. explain the points raised by me and i will have no problem in accepting your explanation if it sounds logical
even the egyptian theory i am talking about i specifically stated i will hold on to that explanation until further evidence is found to disprove it .. i never said i am a believer in that theory and that is the only explanation...
so beside the contradicting statements the summary of this is you will only choose what sounds logical to you,the ideas of quantum mechanics like being in 2 places at once sound illogical to even many educated people doesn't mean it is wrong..

I don't have any issue with your beliefs but i prefer a human who believes in God/spirituality/soul/consciousness... to a man who tries to prove God/spirituality/soul/consciousness...,based on your arguments & your persistence you sound like latter. [MENTION=102842]doomgiver[/MENTION] is also persistent but he has the advantage of mainstream science which you don't so you should have either gracefully withdraw or simply finished off with "time will tell or something like that argument".Instead you chose to stretching it out resulting in this post as well as the impression of a not so rational person being left on myself & quite a few others here.
 

rish1

Cyborg Agent
What more do you want,Stephen Hawking to personally give you a written proof?I gave you links(mainstream science & not some fringe para research) contradicting several of your claims(pyramid,zero brain function recovery).Neither you nor anyone here is a MS nureosurgeon or Phd Quantum Mechanics so both you & others can only give arguments based on work of others & clearly you don't have the advantage in that area(in your own words mainstream science outweigh fringe science).Science will never stay the same does not mean you can say everything science teaches today is wrong.



so beside the contradicting statements the summary of this is you will only choose what sounds logical to you,the ideas of quantum mechanics like being in 2 places at once sound illogical to even many educated people doesn't mean it is wrong..

I don't have any issue with your beliefs but i prefer a human who believes in God/spirituality/soul/consciousness... to a man who tries to prove God/spirituality/soul/consciousness...,based on your arguments & your persistence you sound like latter. [MENTION=102842]doomgiver[/MENTION] is also persistent but he has the advantage of mainstream science which you don't so you should have either gracefully withdraw or simply finished off with "time will tell or something like that argument".Instead you chose to stretching it out resulting in this post as well as the impression of a not so rational person being left on myself & quite a few others here.

trust me on this one i wasn't going to reply when i said i wouldn't because i felt myself that it was being stretched a lot and i wanted to end it at that point, it was raboo sir request to me that i decided ....

you didn't give me anything ,.. ( your brain part is totally wrong and i countered it with wikipedia quotes not some fringe para)
your pyramid only explained 1 piece of the puzzle .. so what did you give ? no i never said i am a neurosurgen but what i am telling you based on the research of these people only, ..

first doomgiver and snap came and started discussing .. then i started discussing it with you , and then raboo sir came and started discussing ..

so its really ok and i understand that it may seem like i am having some sort of proving or pushing agenda, because i am common in all 3 discussions .. but thats not my intention..

anyways if i sound pushy to you ( i understand this and thats why i wrote everytime just because i am saying please don;t assume i fully believe in this stuff until i get evidence for myself)

anyways if you think i pushed or was trying to prove... let me edit all my posts ... i'll delete it myself .. thats the maximum assurance i can give from my side to tell you it wasn't my intention and i wasn't trying to rule the thread or prove anyone anything as you think.. anyways it won't matter now as all of posts of mine will be deleted .. what will be left in quotes of other people .. so you can delete that as well .. i still have no issues with any person or anyone .. and if you have been reading my posts you can see i have not tried to resort any personal attacks despite snap and doomgiver doing so..

anyways it does not matter now .. you can have your thread with no trace of me ever having written anything here ..
 

skeletor

Chosen of the Omnissiah
anyways if you think i pushed or was trying to prove... let me edit all my posts ... i'll delete it myself .. thats the maximum assurance i can give from my side to tell you it wasn't my intention and i wasn't trying to rule the thread or prove anyone anything as you think.. anyways it won't matter now as all of posts of mine will be deleted .. what will be left in quotes of other people .. so you can delete that as well .. i still have no issues with any person or anyone .. and if you have been reading my posts you can see i have not tried to resort any personal attacks despite snap and doomgiver doing so..
well, you shouldn't do that. Why are you getting so emotional?
 

whitestar_999

Super Moderator
Staff member
[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION],why do you think your posts will be deleted,because i can & i disagree with you.As long as your posts conform to forum rules i will not touch them even if i don't like them.This is called freedom of speech which sadly is diminishing in our country.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"--Evelyn Beatrice Hall
You are free to criticize me or even [MENTION=1]Raaabo[/MENTION](i think he is even a bigger supporter of freedom of speech judging by his patience on med....or's posts in the past). :)
 

rish1

Cyborg Agent
- - - Updated - - -

[MENTION=138559]rish[/MENTION],why do you think your posts will be deleted,because i can & i disagree with you.As long as your posts conform to forum rules i will not touch them even if i don't like them.This is called freedom of speech which sadly is diminishing in our country.

You are free to criticize me or even [MENTION=1]Raaabo[/MENTION](i think he is even a bigger supporter of freedom of speech judging by his patience on med....or's posts in the past). :)

i know buddy ;) you wouldn't or any good administrator wouldn't which i knew rabooo sir won't , that's why i took the initiative myself ... criticizing is never useful whether justified or not ..

lets end it .. most of the posts have been already been deleted unfortunately , i'll leave whatever its left ..

well, you shouldn't do that. Why are you getting so emotional?

i was not emotional :lol: ..
far from it .. i actually wanted to have a way out, because it was starting to disturb my plans and taking too much time .. this sounded like a great exit..
doing this way i can fool my subconscious into not visiting and breaking the pattern of visiting digit.in .. no past posts /no id = no desire to visit or indulge into further interaction ;)

so you see my evil plans :D
 
Last edited:

Raaabo

The Dark Lord
Staff member
Admin
Bingo ... we are on the same page
I love how you say that then go on to try and refute everything I say :)
Also, I don't remember a knighthood, so no more sir business please, I'm just another thinker like everyone else here.


...but actually i try to keep out of any sort of belief or faith stuff and have written it in my previous posts as well..
Take a stance, do it openly, without fear or embarrassment, but admit that it's a stance, not a part of a righteous cause and the only acceptable way to think, and everyone who matters will respect you for it.


ok 1st point .. if you assume it exists
I don't assume it exists, I said it might exist, as might a God (despite increasing proof against it). However, in order to make theories and take leaps of faith (as science does often), a base is needed. A base that holds its own against a test of logic and scientific probing.

it isn't in mainstream science yet that is why it isn't well accepted .. you can read up the research done by dean radin , tom campbell, Pear institute , rhine institute , rupert sheldrake , Stargate Project , Research done by Sony and many more.. but they aren't well accepted in mainstream yet like i said before due to repeatability issues and hard to control ability , not accurate everytime.. but that doesn't mean there aren't any positive results..
Again, you lose me at "mainstream". This is the age of the internet, where cats go viral. Actual proof of telepathy in action would run amock and eat aforementioned cats for breakfast. Look at the big deal they made of that silly brain dead study, with crappy articles written about people being brain dead and then coming back and describing events such as white lights, etc. Brain dead = dead, no one's come back from being "brain dead". They talk of under 3 minutes. That's the average drowning victim who's stopped breathing. Lifeguards save people like that on a daily basis. Of course life guards aren't sitting around asking the survivor questions about their experiences, but something tells me a human mind, especially a religious one, would tend to experience a holy experience when approaching death. Even if they didn't, they'd make one up after awakening...


ahh now i see.. you are having totally wrong understanding here..
Perhaps, or perhaps you haven't got what I'm saying. There are cases where people "wake up" despite anesthesia being administered. Surely you understand that the brain is complex and more subconscious than conscious. All that "use only 10% of your brain" stuff comes from that.

Now think about it, how many times have you woken up from a dream that took a weird twist. Like chatting with your mum in a dream and suddenly your mum grows a siren on her head and her face morphs into a speaker and she starts sounding like an alarm... and then you wake up, and realise your alarm is ringing. I exaggerate, but basically incorporating what your conscious brain was unaware of into a dream.

Now, how about regular morning people (I used to be one, not anymore). How many times have you woken up, started at your alarm, and it starts to ring 10/20 seconds later. You weren't sitting about counting minutes, yet you woke up just BEFORE your alarm could go off? Weird right? Yet happens to people ALL the time.

The problem is you're being wowed by some fancy schmancy terms for really everyday things. We don't understand the human brain well enough yet. Actually we don't understand an ant's brain perfectly yet, and can't build a replica of even that still, not even in software... thus, yes we have a long way to go in that department, and nothing should surprise us. So yes, you may think that the brain dies when the heart stops, or stops functioning, or whatever, but the fact is, it doesn't. What's more likely, quantum waves of magic or science just learnt that the brain doesn't need bloodflow to keep firing and stays alive for longer than we thought, with feebler currents than our equipment can measure...


while in a 0 brain function state it is not possible to create any imagery or have any sort of unconscious experience as per brain = consciousness theory

I think someone posted after your post explaining the difference between brain and respiratory death. Loss of consciousness occurs when the heart stops as that's a higher oxygen need, but subconscious stays active for as long as the brain is not "dead", no doubt in diminishing capacity. I don't have the time unfortunately to do a lot of research, and yes my replies are just off the cuff remarks, so excuse any mistakes that arise from not Googling and rechecking everything, but I remember reading the brain stays "alive" for upto 8/10 minutes after the respiration and heartbeat stop, and then after that 10-15 minutes there is sure to be brain damage, and after 25 minutes or so there's only vegetative state remaining... or something like that. But I'm sure the times given were longer than 3/5 minutes which is what most of those links to NDE were citing.

Since the experiments are not being repeated by 100 more people around the globe with success and scientists aren't jumping up and down making press statements about it, I assume this was another study that perhaps was dubiously funded with less than perfect test procedures. I know if I'd just "discovered" a soul or the afterlife, or new quantum magic waves, I'd be making a noise and trying to get my Nobel prize and global recognition, not quietly sitting in a lab happy with some random churches and bishops quoting me...

that they were actually able to see and listen and describe every event that was happening in that room accurately .. the eyes were closed and ears not functioning and the details were later confirmed by doctors and nurses present in the room .. please give an explanation for this .. ohh and also remember these people are heavily drugged before so even a normal person when he is drugged, senses have a hard time in functioning properly let alone a drugged person ..

For one, the statements made by people in such cases as I've read in the past (and never in scientific journals but only in tabloids) are very generic, "I could smell medicines, I could hear clinking of metal equipment, I felt my body jerk and tighten (electric shock), etc" No one says, I heard the nurse talk to the doctor cutting me open about how she "finally got laid last night, and it was with a homeless, transvestite...but still better than being alone..."

Logic dictates that these people have seen too many episodes of Grey's Anatomy, and done a lot of research on things, and describe things in generic ways the way shows or research videos depict them. I am yet to read a very convincing tale of doctors and nurses filing an official report with a video of the ER (all good hospitals have monitoring equipment, especially those conducting such fantastic research and studies), and a video of the patient in the recovery room waking up and going, "OMG I remember EVERYTHING!" Blur out faces and show us these research videos, they'd go viral. If send this prayer to 10 people things can go viral, I'd surely expect a whatsapp message informing me when god is found...


then these people report that they were more "ALIVE" in this state and totally change their lives and personality around after having those experiences..
Of course, it takes something drastic...


any dream or illusion cannot move this person this much that they become totally different person..
By definition an NDE is during a traumatic time. WAY, WAY, closer to death than I got, for example. If that doesn't change them I'd be shocked. Plus, since it's all chemistry anyway, maybe being dead for 3 minutes does that to people. That's another study waiting to be done, the before and after of people who are dead before being brought back to life...

total personality changes like donating up wealth, while earlier some of them used to be mean people afterwards they start helping other , do more public service and become compassionate people , totally atheist and materialist people start becoming religious etc .. and the best part these people loose the "Fear of death" and become much more peaceful and happy..

What you just described doesn't need near death or out of body experiences. Sometimes it comes with emotional experiences, sometimes with age and a change in chemistry (maturing), etc. Bill Gates is a prime example, and I don't remember reading about any drastic experience with him, or him becoming super religious or whatever...

I know many atheists who don't "fear death" and are happy, many religious people too... heck even terrorists don't fear death, it's not that rare a quality, really. It's just a chemical state that arises out of being assured internally of one's righteousness.


wow thats great you have been through that experience and i can understand why you hold on to that notion of slavery..

sadness is a chemical process but what causes sadness ? but what allowed you to have fear to begin the chemical process of FEAR ?

I'm glad my misery is "great" to you ;-)
(I'm kidding I know what you meant, but I am picking on what you typed, because that's what a$$es like me do)

Let me give you another theory based on logic but with no proof whatsoever. This is the one thread on the internet where people who argue against me should allow me that liberty, since that's all they do anyway. ;-)

Brainwashed science believers please close your ears and go "la-la-la" loudly for the next 10 minutes.

Like I said before, the brain has two components, conscious and sub-conscious, and they're connected. Think of them as a client-server relationship (this is TDF after all). The client is the conscious, the server the sub-conscious. Both run different OSes, but talk to each other often. They're not as seamlessly connected as our real-world computers are with, say, defined protocols and precise coding.

For creationists: This is because God is actually a stoner geek who likes to code life in his spare time when high, and has thrown in about 2% proper code and 98% of Easter eggs and memory hogging rubbish - which you can call JAVA, if you want.

For evolutionists: Because our brain still has so many remnants of all the evolutionary species we once were, there's a lot of birdsongs and monkey mating calls still rattling about up there...


Despite this imperfect connection, still, somehow things get done. Of course there are glitches galore, and people can sometimes forget even basic things like the spelling of "the", or forget the name of a popular character in a book, and then 1 hour later in a totally random situation shout "Aha, now I remember, her name is Clarice!" -- not the best thing to remember during your own wedding ceremony, but, well that's the way the stoner coded it...

The client tries to constantly control the server, and the server always tries to control the client, and in this tug of war, sometimes one wins, and other times the other. For some things, there's no competition. You cannot read when sleepy. You cannot unlearn how to ride a bike.

Thus, with all this imperfect chemistry at play, sometimes weird things happen, and people go nuts, some become more rational and almost everyone matures. Men become better as the testosterone levels drop slightly after the teens. We call it getting serious. Men and women fall in "love", differently, because the chemistry of our brains are slightly different (sorry feminazis, it's true, we are different).

So basically, we're all different, but all still the same, because you may have different fu**-ups in your head than me, but the truth is we're all fu**ed-up and yet all still "sane". We agree on many things, and disagree on a few. We all agree that rape is bad (majority, not ALL), freedom is good, etc. But that's because of a common upbringing. Someone who has lived in a country with a dictatorship forever might feel that's the best way to live. Billions of Chinese might feel communism is the best way...

How do we find what's right? Expose everyone to everything, try everything, experience it all, travel, see the world, bring differences of opinions together like here and let people decide on their own...


when i raise up my hand , certain part of the brain stimulates and sends an electrical charge to my hand to move muscles and that makes it rise up

when i cut and open the brain and stimulate the same part of brain through an electrode my muscles move and my hand rises up but still i am not the one raising it up .. why ?

if i was a chemical slave wouldn't giving the same chemical or electrical charge to my brain externally make me raise up my hand ?

yet it does not make me do it..

When you click a create new folder button, why is it always called "New Folder", or "New Folder1". You know what folder you want, why doesn't the OS just do it? Because your connection with the OS is through a limited means. A button, a mouse and a keyboard. If it were wired to your conscious brain, it would just create what you thought, as you thought it... the connections between conscious and sub-conscious are different from what we can achieve physically, for now.

However, without doing anything drastic such as cutting up your brain or using electro-shock therapy... think of the movies... You may be a cold and lifeless rock, so I won't assume 100% success, but I can say with some surety, that almost everyone has been moved to tears at some point in their life by some movie. Yes, yes, even macho men who never show feelings have had their eyes well up, and then they push down and bottle up emotions as "real men" should. That's chemistry, making you lose control and do what you normally wouldn't.

you claim that you are a chemical slave .. where is your proof ? its just a theory
consciousness inside the brain is just a theory without any proof !!! and yes scientists have explored all the parts of brain for so many years and tried stimulating every part of it yet they are unable to find the one who is controlling the brain ?

Everything is a theory, even with proof. That's the beauty of science, it isn't perfect. It's a work in progress, based on physical findings, and extrapolations made off of those findings, and often wrong. Just because we haven't found it yet doesn't mean it's inexplicable, or cannot be found. We didn't find out just about anything until a thousand years ago (millions of years after existence), yet in 20 years we've gone from postal communication to this... give it time. Don't consider "not knowing" as a "failure", it's merely an "opportunity" to learn even more.



yes you can make me depressed happy or any feeling by giving pills and drugs.. BUT BUT BUT you cannot make me choose anything i don't want .. even in case of torture / fear or drugging me with anything i would still have to consciously at some level choose myself .. you can't do it .. not at all..

Want to bet? I can make you kill yourself. Assuming you don't want to do that at some level already... it's a 180 on your life philosophy. You might say you would "Never commit suicide" and yet I can make you do it using only chemicals. That's me choosing FOR you. You don't spend 60K on an iPhone unless you've been coaxed into it by some external force.

Of course there are things you choose, but that's based again on your subconscious, your nature. Some people are greedy, others aren't. Whatever external forces went into influencing them that way, it resulted in this "personality". Some is also genetic (again chemical).

You're short and fat, (hypothetically; you could use 8 foot circus freak if you prefer!) because the gene mix you inherited from your parents is short and fat, and thus your world view is from the eyes of a person who grew up being short and fat. Then it's another set called India, part of a larger global set called male, then a city sub-set, a religious set, an education set, a language set... all of this is different experiences causing different chemical reactions to make a compound (a collection of compounds? A compound, compound of compounds?) called "you" which is unique in some ways and kind of ordinary in many more ways.

So it's all out of control, and truly we are "slaves" who cannot be blamed for our actions... NO, I did not mean slave in that way. I meant that chemistry runs us and our "consciousness". The "I think therefore I am" is made possible because of chemistry. And brain chemistry is brilliant, because people can alter it by thinking!

Minor treatments ? really ? what about the guy who needed to have an arthritis surgery .. doctors try to run an experiment with him, gave him fake surgery ( made a cut and stitch it back without performing any surgery )
fooled that guy, that he was being given a real surgery and surprisingly the guy magically heals ? and what above those Countless "Miracles" where people were supposed to die due to cancer , tumors and those stage 4 cancers magically just disappear ?

I hear about these a lot, and no proof ever. It's always tabloids, never scientific journals. Minor and mind-related ailments, yes. For example I've read of people who insisted on pains in their joints and needing surgery, being fooled by methods you described. I am yet to find a credible source that runs a study of people being cured of cancer using faith (monitored by medicine). I would be grateful if people would give inks to actual medical studies if this is happening everywhere suddenly and I'm behind the times (very probable).


you can google it up if you want to all of them are in medical literature...

I did a little before, no credible sources.


watch it on superhumans for demonstration :p :lol: ohh and if you think its due to some gene .. almost all buddhists monks can do this and not only this they can increase their body temperatures enough to evaporate wet sheets at will .. slow their heart beats, pulse etc some can even stop that at will and achieve a flatline of brain with 0 activity

again are we slaves of chemistry ?

Hearsay. Proof needed please. And yes, living things are a slave to chemistry. I have no doubt that there are intelligent people and people who practise and hone skills to gain better control of aspects of their brain. However, it will take an evolution change to make humans stop being slaves to chemistry.

Why look at monks? There are coders out there who see code in ways most cannot. There's only 1 Messi and 1 Cristiano Ronaldo. Einsteins are scarce too, Newtons even more so... Ever seen strongmen challenges? Hot dog eating competitions where the little Asian guy wins? Humans can do all sorts of stuff with their bodies and minds. Non-buddhists, pork-eating, beer-guzzling, atheist, rednecks can dislocate joints at will and lie on nails and walk on coals, and Brazilian people crucify themselves in the name of Christ, and his "power" makes them not feel pain... Muslims do it for Muharram... explain all that then...

Should we all just believe that the ancients knew everything and thus each will believe that his religion or dogma teaches the only right path, and we stay in status quo... or we accept that it's not religious, and there's no one fixed method or mental state or path to get to that point, but more a chemical state, which is achieved by the brain feeling a certain something, and try and figure that out. Wouldn't it be great for science for you to walk into an operating theatre, put on headphones, and hear a tone that automatically sedates and makes you immune to pain? Chemical reactions using catalysts... sight, sound, touch, etc to cause chemical changes in your brain and body? Feeling acidity? Here watch this video ad for sneakers that also cures acidity!


you are totally misinformed here what do you think yoga is ? a bunch of exercises to reduce weight ?

its hardly physical and almost all of it is mental ...

you should read this

*www.swamij.com/pdf/swami-rama-beyond-biofeedback.pdf

I've not read this but read about Yoga before. It's a nice physical and mental exercise that tries and finds common ways in which to alter the chemistry of your body for beneficial outcomes. Some get the same results from playing with their kids in a park. Others need to run 5 km, some swim, others can achieve the mental state by reading, thinking absolutely nothing, or trying to solve complex math equations... it's all relative.


sir you are mistaking me as some kind of "blind faith religious fanboy" and i can assure you i am anything but that .. did i even say anywhere that i believe in Mahabharat and it knows all secrets ?

Your subconscious adds tones and other markers to what you say, and it suggests that you believe that "your" heritage and history is superior to others. It's OK. That's the case for 99.999% of the world, it's actually very, very normal. However, your conscious mind perhaps believes it is unbiased, which isn't the case and seems to make conflicting statements at times.

were those discovery of ancient batteries fake or made up story ? if those batteries are real doesn't that imply they knew a good amount of stuff ? whats not logical about it ?

Fake, yes, they weren't batteries at all.

have they figured out how did they create egyptian pyramids with precise precision with only simple tools ?
Yes, they have. It's the simplest way to build tall. Kids do it, with small blocks. The advantage they had then was making it a national obsession. It was how cricket is to India in Egypt. Thus they were the best at it. Plus it helps to have a million slaves.


i am saying its simple magnetism and other laws which we don't understand today which they had knowledge...

It's nice and fantastical to believe that "they" knew and understood things we didn't, but the fact is they knew NOTHING compared to what we know. Look at the proof around you. It will take much more than 2000 years to wipe us clean from the planet. How on earth can you subscribe to an old civilisation knowing about radioactivity and magnetism, and yet leaving no proof of it behind. Where are all the metal structures, why stone? Where are the man-made radioactive pits caused by explosions or bomb creation. Where are the plans engraved. If you were to engrave in stone (bothersome and hard), would you describe your society as cows walking on the streets or Mangalyaan?


the only point i was making that "not all ancient people were dumb and stupid" .. thats all.. imagining all of that in that time period would have been a great intellectual accomplishment ..
No one said they were dumb. However if they came to our world they would not teach us, they would die of mental overload trying to understand way too many new concepts that kids of today take for granted. Thus in that sense, and only that sense, they are dumb comparatively to today's scientists, but still brilliant in their own time.

it could be that they used real places and made up a fiction story...

Exactly. You have the right understanding now. Think of ALL the movies set in New York and Washington, and how many times the damn White House and Statue of Liberty have been smashed... Until the explosions, those are actually shot in the real cities... then imagination kicks in... it's been that way for as long as we have had language... from cave paintings to the latest Hollywood big budget blockbuster.


..."if you follow these exercises they will give you X result"... would that religion last ? ...expand your mind and consciousness to give you proof your conscious Mind and Body are seperate...not based on any sort of chemical fear/theory/need to believe/fooling people then i am sorry that's not logical in my books....

There's a chemical reaction that causes you to believe in something. It happens when you are convinced. Every magician on earth right now preys on this. Misdirection, making you feel smart, and then poof, making you feel astounded. That's the way to blow people's minds. Distort reality with tricks. However, it becomes obvious that it's a trick, and that's not someone you believe or follow, that's someone you distrust.

So who or what do you follow? Someone who doesn't make you believe that they're better than you. Not someone who fools you, but someone who makes you believe that others are the fools. Or if not that, then someone who makes you believe that you are improving, you are seeing something that others cannot. The fact that the utter rubbish book, The Secret sold so many million copies is testament to this.

Higher consciousness, as I've been told by yogis and babas and Buddhists from India and Nepal, is more often what I'd describe as a heightened state of awareness. Yes some states have been described to me as what I can only equate to as being stoned out of your mind. And interestingly, many of them smoke pot to achieve this state of mind... this also makes them super-cool to the current gen, and thus I can see why Yoga and stuff catches on in the West. It's not that it's manifold better than, say jogging and doing mental exercises yourself, but it certainly is cooler, and easier, and also a socially accepted pastime.

So what causes people to live in mountains and beg for alms. The need to be different, a little special, impractical? No offense to anyone's beliefs, I'm not saying this choice is a conscious one, just as some kids are obviously doing bad things for attention, some go overboard with good deeds, trying to be always right, overtly honest (to the point of being tattle tails)...

Adults are also as varied: Some do things for others to notice because they feel the need to seem important to the world, while some do things to feel important themselves, and couldn't be bothered what the world thinks.

so lets just say i am an open minded outsider , wherever that leads me .. ;)
That's wonderful and rare if you can pull it off. But it's important to not remain a fence-sitter if you want to get somewhere. No harm in heading down a wrong path and digging deeper, that way if you're wrong, at least you learnt what NOT to believe... Most people become atheists this way, fyi. I haven't met an atheist who hasn't first dug deep into the religion of his/her upbringing looking for answers and eventually finding disappointment... of course some go on to just join science and treat it as a religion, which is also wrong... However, use logic, try simple answers before complex ones, and demand proof and repeat-ability, and you will generally be happier with the answers you get... or so I have experienced for myself...

And what's this about deleting posts? As you've been told. IN the fight club we expect arguments, but you're as entitled to your point of view as I am to mine. Please don't delete things, and especially not out of fear of being banned or whatever, because that will never happen. The only reason I banned Mediator was because of his constant and vocal hatred for some religions, which was causing complaints.

You can say you don't agree with something and why... but calling a religion names and it's followers evil, etc will earn people a ban. Fight, but with respect for one another, that's all :)
 
Last edited:

Anorion

Sith Lord
Staff member
Admin
For one, the statements made by people in such cases as I've read in the past (and never in scientific journals but only in tabloids) are very generic, "I could smell medicines, I could hear clinking of metal equipment, I felt my body jerk and tighten (electric shock), etc" No one says, I heard the nurse talk to the doctor cutting me open about how she "finally got laid last night, and it was with a homeless, transvestite...but still better than being alone..."

This is derived from a study published in a journal called Resuscitation, but it was a Tabloid that highlighted the interesting bits

“But in this case conscious awareness appears to have continued for up to three minutes into the period when the heart wasn’t beating, even though the brain typically shuts down within 20-30 seconds after the heart has stopped.

“The man described everything that had happened in the room, but importantly, he heard two bleeps from a machine that makes a noise at three-minute intervals.


“So we could time how long the experienced lasted for.

“He seemed very credible and everything that he said had happened to him had actually happened.”

Largest study into near-death experiences discovers awareness may continue even after the brain shuts down | National Post

sciency-y version here > Near-death experiences? Results of the world's largest medical study of the human mind and consciousness at time of death -- ScienceDaily
 
Top Bottom