No, genius, it was always foul behavior. I've pointed it out before, if in a more subtle manner but
your comprehension skills are too low to understand that. Obviously a guy who brings in
anti-crespular rays to defend a game like Call of Duty will not understand
Before accusing me with rubbish like that, re-read what I posted and come back. I said that just because you have not played cel-shaded games of the sort does not mean you can stereotype them as having bad emotional depth and bad animations. Obviously a guy who thinks controls and story pacing are the same thing will post BS just to get back at you and act like a wiseguy.
Instead of resorting to appeal to authority, answer the damn question. And to answer your question, yes, I do work on video games as a hobby. I've made levels on the Source Engine. I'm also designing some concepts which I hope to implement in my own games after I finish college. You've done this before and been asked not to do it, so mind your language.
When you first posted about the walking dead, you didn't say that you've never played cel-shaded games with good emotions. You implied that cel-shaded games are bad at portraying emotions
________
There you go stereotyping and making generalizations yet again...
I didn't tell you to not recommend or recommend anything. I only pointed out that you are stereotyping a genre as horseshit whose games you enjoy yourself. All I did was post relevant examples of games that were cel-shaded and had good animations, emotional depth and you took it upon yourself to classify their entire genres as bad. [sarcasm]But I forget that Vickybat is the only authority in the video game world and his word is absolute. After all, only he has the power to be able to judge a game without even playing it.[/sarcasm]
Do tell what gives final fantasy an edge over other JRPGs?
No, it just means that you are in no position to comment on anything at all in the video games section. You do not have any credibility to post authoritatively about video games.