i'll second that......And i am waiting for only GTA4.
GameTrailers; said:Review - Will you want to bust a smuggling operation in the Tri-City Bay Area?
There is no cure for fanboi ,EA has been attacked left right and center for their mostly crappy games.Maybe a reviewer had some rift with EA.(He didnt get his due amount )
Cuz any NFS game cant be that bad.
Even ProStreet was 6.5 ... And I saw the gameplay videos ... It isnt that bad.
Part of the reason for this is the game's complete and utter misuse of its open world setting. The major reason for having an open world is to allow gamers to explore their environment, find new challenges, perhaps some hidden locations and generally hunt down people to race. That doesn't happen one bit in Undercover. You cannot even drive to an event to start it or enter your garage. To begin an event, you can either head to the overhead map, which requires a couple of seconds of loading despite its utter simplicity, or simply press down on the D-Pad. This will load up whatever your nearest event is, or in some cases, the next major event you're supposed to take part in.
@amrawtanshx:There is no cure for fanboi ,EA has been attacked left right and center for their mostly crappy games.
(dead space has garnered pretty reviews so it must be an exception)
Just once..BTW I run on all settings to high max res but disabled AA and Shadows.It works fine^Do we have to do this each time we play the game or just once?
OK..based on the info that Conqueror posted above.... and the review that I just watched on Gametrailers, can anybody please clarify the following points:
Note: I am playing the game on Vista, nVidia driver 178.24, Max Graphical settings and @ 1680x1050 @ 4X AA.
1) Does the game fare better on XP ??
2) The review showed that the roads and the cars have strong reflections, but what I can see is that the roads are non-reflective as well as the cars have much lesser reflection and detail than expected... is that happening with you guys ?? The screenshots posted earlier by some readers here also showed that the roads are just lifeless and graphically pathetic !!!!
3) @ The Conqueror: Could you please post some of your screenies, so that we can compare with ours.... something doesn't seem right here with the game on our PCs as the game just looks worse than even the age-old NFS:MW... I might reinstall the game and try it on XP with the trick that you posted above....and thanx a lot for posting that trick !!!
Actually they might be running the game on low settings or bilinear or trilinear filter or on low res.
I would post later in the evening.
Actually my xfire hasnt yet recognised this game so once it does i will be able to take the screenies easily.Thanks a lot for the quick reply. The screenies posted earlier were claimed to be taken at max settings and running on very high end hardware like GTX280 !!! As I am doing the same on an SLi/C2Q rig and even at maxed out settings the graphics are pathetic and lifeless.. all I can see is the glaring overused HDR (excessive sun glares) and blandly overused excessive shader effects which are not at all pleasing to the eyes....thats Why asked that question... anyways, I guess I will be looking forward to see your screenies... thanks again.
Not in my case. I posted those screenshots with every bit of detail maxed out & that includes setting filter options to Anisotropic. Even then it doesn't look as good as the console versions. The frame rates have bad jumps. The environment detail isn't that good either. Overdone HDR. Screenshots don't reflect much but I would say it's pretty much OK in the graphics unless the frame rate issues are fixed.Actually they might be running the game on low settings or bilinear or trilinear filter or on low res.