tarey_g said:
3. Did ipod have the 3000+ accesories in the first week of release?
We are not talking about the market 5 years ago. We are talking about the market at this time. I said this because this is one of (many) major factors that makes ipod far far better than zune.
What you said is something like "I will release a mobile phone similar to the motorola's first mobile phone. Do they have a colour screen when launched? Do they have gr8 voice quality and network reception when launched".
4. Resale value of a ipod is high as it has been in the market from a long time and buyer knows the stability of the product and the value for money, u can't compare the resale values of a newly launched product to an established product . what a lame point .
Right. can't compare the resale value at launch time that is why I added the comment "it doesn't have sale. how can it have resale value?"
5. Apple updates lineup in six months, its not even 6 weeks the zune has launched and u started making ur judgements. Funny.
Yes. Microsoft cannot compete with Apple in updating their line up. The best comparison will be in Operating System sector. Look at how apple is upgrading it's OS X line up and Microsoft has not released any new OS for couple of years.
Apple is a company that takes the initiative and Microsoft follows the initiatives taken by other companies.
__________
mAV3 said:
the search feature of the ipod also sux andy its as good as not having it ..... as far as linux and rockbox im waiting for my warranty period of 1 yr to get over ....
oh. I thought you would like the Search feature as having something is important for you than to have nothing.
No need to worry about warranty. rockbox is not gonna crash your ipod. You can keep the existing firmware partition and install rockbox on the remaining space and this will not void warranty as it doesn't overwrite ipod's O/S. Moreover, if you have any problem with linux, you can restore ipod to factory default from itunes.
Note: Don't try linux on ipod if you are Pure Windows user and have no idea how to do partitioning using linux on ipod.
u like a clean ui doesnt mean evry1 likes it and it sure doesnt mean tht every1 shud adhere to it .....
75% of folks using mp3 players have adhered to just because they like it and the number is increasing.
aur bhai bacha paida hote hi bolna chalna nahi seekh ta ....
and u dissapoint me .....i thought u were older but u again again proove otherwise .... zune is competin against the 30gb gen5 ipod not the shuffle .... how can u compare the shuffle with the zune
hmm. I thought you were big enough to understand what I said.
Let me do the spoon feeding. You should have read the line "I have heard people saying that zune is ipod killer"
Apple has ipod shuffle ($79), ipod nano ($150-$250) that comes in 6 colors, ipod ($249-$349) 30, 60 and 80GB. This means apple has a product line up for every user from budget savvy to geek.
Microsoft has Zune 30GB ($250) that comes in while, black and brooooown (yaaak).
Come to India, zune will be priced at Rs.16,000. How many can buy an mp3 player for Rs. 16,000. Only a few. Others will go for shuffle and nano.
For Microsoft to take a bite in apple's share it should have a similar or heavier line up of (not zune) a better player that is better than ipod in all aspects.
For example, take Sansa Sandisk e250R. It's better than ipod nano in all aspects (except audio quality). So, it's now the second best selling flash based mp3 player.
Microsoft is much much bigger company than Sansa. Why can't they do the same thing? Even Toshiba Gigabeat S is better than Zune.
Finally, I do hope Microsoft launches an extremely competitive product line up in PMP/mp3 market. Then I would see an ipod that's far far better than the current ipod (better than the best) and would still stick to ipod lineup.