@Sam.Shab - when u say architecture do u mean the new threading technology by Intel(I forgot wats the technology is called,HT may be) or the large L3 cache?
nope. HT (hyper threading) was introduced in P4 (my 2nd rig having P4 @ 3Ghz with HT but still looses to slower Dual Core). Intel made some major changes. like QPI. this is far faster than FSB (used by AMD & Intel) in rest of the processors. also the clock of their L2 & L3 cache is high. L3 cache itself is 8Mb. One more thing is their memory controller is much better than AMD (so using 1333 or 1600Mhz with low or high latency yields almost same result. use it in Intel & see the difference in performance).
they mad i7 the ultimate proccy (but at the expense of very high pricing)
"having so many cores in general is good in some, bad in others".Can u be specific as in wat kinda applications use many cores n wat don't(like games,video encoding n others)?
in short Intel proccy good for all apps but some apps don't need the huge performance Intel delivers. than all the extra money goes in complete waste. like in gaming, Core i3/i5/i7 holds a huge lead over AMD processors. in Video Encoding, i7 9** matches the X6 1090T & beats the 1050T. but Intel will cost you much more (processor & mobo combined) but the performance is just better (than AMD) at best. you need go through the reviews & benchmarks to have a better idea.
2yrs ago. when Core2Quad was selling like hot cakes, had anyone told that AMD will bring Phenom II X6 that beats all the Core2Quad (& some Core2Extreme), that "someone" will be centre of a big joke. more bigger joke had he mentioned that the price will be @ ~10k. now its a realty. i feel by year end when Phenom II X6 1075T comes, it'll debut at 7-8k. Athlon II X2 wil become EOL & its place will be taken by Athlon II X4 (thats my view).