Windows vs Linux vs BSD's vs Solaris vs Other OS'es

Status
Not open for further replies.

mehulved

18 Till I Die............
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

blackpearl said:
People who proudly say that "I use linux, why do I need Windows?", don't know what they are missing.
Yeah man I am really missing those viruses, crashed applications. Wasting of my time and resources running anti-virus, anti-spyware and anti-what not. I also miss being on constant guard to see if the site I am visiting doesn't have malware, the viruses in my mailbox don't auto-execute. I also miss those frustrating days when you had no clue how to troubleshoot if windows doesn't detect my hardware. And I miss those dreaded days of using IE.
blackpearl said:
And its better if we not discuss about security and stability issues. Almost 90% of the servers that get hacked every month throighout the world runs Linux. Go to any security website like secunia.com and you will find tons of vulnerabilities for linux and open source s/w.
If so then why do more websites with mission critical performance choose Open Source OS'es over Windows? Your analogy is too flawed.
blackpearl said:
And I don't remember when my Windows XP+SP2 crashed last time.
When your hero gxsaurav installed some IE7's RC on his XP SP2 and it came to such a point where OS was unrecoverable. He was asking for help in middle of the night on how to recover his data using Ubuntu GNU/Linux Live CD. But, he was stuck cos MS doesn't allow linux to bundle the proprietory ntfs drivers, so he couldn't write on his ntfs partition. And besides I saw BSOD on 4 computers in a nearby cyber cafe some 2-3 months back. They were running XP-SP2.
 

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

tech_your_future said:
1> Yeah man I am really missing those viruses, crashed applications.

2> Wasting of my time and resources running anti-virus, anti-spyware and anti-what not.

3> I also miss being on constant guard to see if the site I am visiting doesn't have malware, the viruses in my mailbox don't auto-execute.

4> I also miss those frustrating days when you had no clue how to troubleshoot if windows doesn't detect my hardware.

5> And I miss those dreaded days of using IE.

I dont want to take part in this MS vs Linux, but i have following to say(my experience only).

1> I seriously dont remember when my OS crashed last time , i have even forgot how the BSOD looks like(its blue, i remember that).

2> As a gamer dont use any AV program/Anti spyware or anti what not to eat up the memory.Computer is totally clean and stable. I used to install AV and perform virus chk monthly in old days , don't even do that anymore.

3> I surf web freely and visit all sorts(including the ones which i was earlier afraid to visit from a windows pc) of sites . the sites with possible malwares . unless until some one is a big idiot to hit ok to install something god knows what it is(happens in cyber cafes). Nothing gets installed without my notice (may be i am lucky from past 1.5 years).

4> 98?

5> IE7 works perfect , you can use Firefox too .

adding to this , i am the only person in the whole family who can/does work on linux. Others feel comfortable with windows. They are currently enjoying Vista RC1.
I love working on windows and have no reason to hate it or linux either.
 
Last edited:

mediator

Technomancer
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

^^How many people in ur family use windows? And how many of them use it completely like using all sort of softwares like entertainment ones,office ones,programming ones,gaming ones and video editing ones??
If ur family members only work on MS office, then ofcors u have no reason to worry! But consider the case where all ur family members have administrative priviledges and can install any software they like without ur permission and visit any site! Do u think the face of windows will remain the same?
Ofcors on a PC, I can too survive without any anti-virus! But tell me how many tweaking softwares u use or used after completely installing windows?? How many startup programs u encounter after installing new softwares? Havent u ever used any software to remove teh startup entries? DOnt u use firewall to monitor the activities of the softwares and save bandwidth?
If u neither use firewall nor use any antispyware etc than its hard for me to believe u that ur system is still free of adwares,malwares etc and number of startup entries still the same as before when u first installed a software!

Linux means complete freedom from any sorta tension. Visit any site without any hindrance carefreely etc. U cant have the same for windows. Do u?
 

Zeeshan Quireshi

C# Be Sharp !
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

gxsaurav said:
nah, there are always cheaper way to buy legal Windows, such as OEM, or student license etc

& tarey, u r right.....it's Windows, the easiest OS out there, u don't need to download 400 MB of stuff, dependencies, codec etc, just so it works, u pay for it, it's already there

even with Paid Linux distros u don't get

1) Codec, well I don't know much maybe u do

2) Proper IM clients - Voice chat on GAIM, yeah right...it's a great
experience, what about webcam , it just doesn't work

3) There are no drivers for your hardware, well...it's not the fault of Linux & it's low market share & non-standard drivers because of which one driver for one distro doesn't work with other distro...it's the fault of Hardware manufacturer, cos they are not open sourcing their drivers, for which they spend millions to innovate & make algorithms etc, so that hardware works efficiently:D

Linux will always be a geek OS, unless the Creation of Linux distributions UI is given to designers instead of Coders, seriously, coders can't design, they give really nice apps but forget to give a good UI for it

I recently tried ubuntu in Vmware on my PC, & even to install gwget, a download manager I went to synaptic, searched, & it found nothing....I tried downloading & I was given the source code....I m a user, what m I supposed to do with the source code, can I have a package plz...no wait, I can't, cos .deb package won't work with any other distro...so I must compile from source code, that’s the easiest distribution method

I just can't believe, how can Linux users stay happy when they miss out so much using Linux. But again, it's not their fault; it's the fault of the companies.

Linux is & always will be a minority OS, & even with tough anti-piracy measures, Windows Vista will be cracked too, i hate MS for so high prices, but like i said, there are always other ways to get it legally

well i agree . linux is not the perfect choice for desktop use but it is a good choice for specialised uses , servers , schools, etc . for desktop use , surfing , mail , etc r ok but you can't go further . i twanted a good bittorrent client on ubuntu and i couldn't find any , azureus always crashed on my machine , even the one installed from ubuntu's repository didn't work correctly , plus there r many other minor glitches which need to be taken care of .

tarey_g said:
I dont want to take part in this MS vs Linux, but i have following to say(my experience only).

1> I seriously dont remember when my OS crashed last time , i have even forgot how the BSOD looks like(its blue, i remember that).

2> As a gamer dont use any AV program/Anti spyware or anti what not to eat up the memory.Computer is totally clean and stable. I used to install AV and perform virus chk monthly in old days , don't even do that anymore.

3> I surf web freely and visit all sorts(including the ones which i was earlier afraid to visit from a windows pc) of sites . the sites with possible malwares . unless until some one is a big idiot to hit ok to install something god knows what it is(happens in cyber cafes). Nothing gets installed without my notice (may be i am lucky from past 1.5 years).

4> 98?

5> IE7 works perfect , you can use Firefox too .

adding to this , i am the only person in the whole family who can/does work on linux. Others feel comfortable with windows. They are currently enjoying Vista RC1.
I love working on windows and have no reason to hate it or linux either.

same here , i haven't installed any AV , n i use firefox , if you just don't install any software or toolbar you get online you'll be fine . AND i haven't seen the BSOD ever .
 

mehulved

18 Till I Die............
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

tarey_g said:
Nope XP SP2. I have never ever used Windows 98, just XP and 2000.
It just randomly worked fine sometimes and other times I had no clue why would it not even detect the drivers. And in between both I didn't even make any changes or reboot my PC. And there were sometimes some problems with soundcard too. And other times all was fine.
 

blackpearl

The Devil
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

OMG!! linux vs windows again? This topic knows no end, does it?

The problem with linux users are they are very poorly informed about Windows. Yes, they are carrying on a totally wrong belief that windows is vulnerable. People just don't know how to use windows so they get BSODs and virus and all. I m running XP+SP2 with auto updates OFF, autopatcher installed till sep 2005, thats more than 1 yr old. An AV and a firewall- thats all. No anti spywares nothing. On the net, I browse around the most notoriously infected sites like cracks and hacking sites but still I have not got a single virus or spyware. Why? because I know how to use my computer.

All linux supporters are misinformed. They thing windows means BSODS, virus and spywares. Totally wrong!! Like I said, I have yet to see a BSOD on my XP machine.

Does that mean that linux users are dumb? if they get infected with viruses and spywares the moment they use XP, then it seems like it.
__________
tech_your_future said:
Yeah man I am really missing those viruses, crashed applications. Wasting of my time and resources running anti-virus, anti-spyware and anti-what not. I also miss being on constant guard to see if the site I am visiting doesn't have malware, the viruses in my mailbox don't auto-execute. I also miss those frustrating days when you had no clue how to troubleshoot if windows doesn't detect my hardware. And I miss those dreaded days of using IE.

If so then why do more websites with mission critical performance choose Open Source OS'es over Windows? Your analogy is too flawed.

Nope, servers run linux because they are very light on system resources, can be run for days without restart and don't even need a GUI or may be even a monitor to function. I agree windows has got to improve a lot on server side, but for home computing there is nothing like windows.

And besides I saw BSOD on 4 computers in a nearby cyber cafe some 2-3 months back. They were running XP-SP2.

Duh!! why give examples of PCs on a cybercafe? they are the most worst maintained PCs on the world.
 
Last edited:

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

mediator said:
^^How many people in ur family use windows? And how many of them use it completely like using all sort of softwares like entertainment ones,office ones,programming ones,gaming ones and video editing ones??
If ur family members only work on MS office, then ofcors u have no reason to worry! But consider the case where all ur family members have administrative priviledges and can install any software they like without ur permission and visit any site! Do u think the face of windows will remain the same?

4 people in my family who know very little about computers, work on office, play games ,enjoy music/movies, surf internet. i am the only guy that does programming on the comp. I have two user accounts on the comp, one for me and other for everyone else , both accounts have administrative rights, i want them to learn and install whatever they want(mostly game demos, and the apps from magazine dvd's). I just told everyone to not to install if anything pops up while surfing ,so simple imo.

mediator said:
Ofcors on a PC, I can too survive without any anti-virus! But tell me how many tweaking softwares u use or used after completely installing windows?? How many startup programs u encounter after installing new softwares? Havent u ever used any software to remove teh startup entries? DOnt u use firewall to monitor the activities of the softwares and save bandwidth?
If u neither use firewall nor use any antispyware etc than its hard for me to believe u that ur system is still free of adwares,malwares etc and number of startup entries still the same as before when u first installed a software!

About the tweaking softwares , what kind of softwares are you talking about? I just use tweakui to just pesonalize my windows experience changing menu delays,adjust hover time etc etc etc many things. Is that bad?

Some new softwares get added to startup when installed , most of the softwares have option to remove themselvs from startup , or you can use msconfig to simply uncheck the ones you dont want from the list of softwares in startup. who needs a special software for that?

About firewall softwares i just use the windows default firewall nothing more than that , it works fine.

mediator said:
Linux means complete freedom from any sorta tension. Visit any site without any hindrance carefreely etc. U cant have the same for windows. Do u?

I do not disagree and me not a linux hater for no reason, my only point is that windows despite being contineously targeted by new malwares/viruses is doing great job by providing continuous updates to the users.
yes I Visit any site without any hindrance carefreely etc ,and i do it in windows .
 

mehulved

18 Till I Die............
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

blackpearl said:
The problem with linux users are they are very poorly informed about Windows.
I believe most of linux users started out with windows cos people hardly know of Linux since it doesn't run big marketing campaigns.

blackpearl said:
All linux supporters are misinformed.
Yeah cos we always get information from untrusted sources.

blackpearl said:
Does that mean that linux users are dumb? if they get infected with viruses and spywares the moment they use XP, then it seems like it.
Yeah I am too dumb. I don't know how to operate computers properly. But, why do most geeky people out there prefer to use *nix based OS's over Windows?

blackpearl said:
Duh!! why give examples of PCs on a cybercafe? they are the most worst maintained PCs on the world.
Well even my PC is unmaintained still doesn't crash.
 

blackpearl

The Devil
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

tech_your_future said:
Yeah cos we always get information from untrusted sources.

Why take info from untrusted sources?

Yeah I am too dumb. I don't know how to operate computers properly. But, why do most geeky people out there prefer to use *nix based OS's over Windows?

For the benefit of such statements: "I use linux, you use Windows. So I m geekier than you"

For the true geeks, they might prefer *nix to windows because *nix is a great platform for programming. If you have no interest in games and other wonderful commercial s/w available for windows, and the only thing you like to do is program and word-process then you will be happy with linux.

Well even my PC is unmaintained still doesn't crash.

Whoaa!! isn't that contradictory to your previous statements?

P.S: Why are we fighting??? :D
 

JGuru

Wise Old Owl
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

@Tarey_g, You say Windows O.S is very stable. Why then is Microsoft putting more
efforts & time to make Vista more secure? I tell you why. The reason is M$$ received
so many complaints about it's Windows NT-based Servers from the Corporates!!!
The big Fortune 500 companies who are using Windows servers lost millions of dollars
because of hackers, worm-attack, Windows O.S instability etc., Didn't you read the
newspapers . When Sasser worm attacked MS Windows , millions of computers
running Windows were paralysed!!! I don't think you need more proof Windows O.S's
instability!!!!
 

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

hi,

JGuru said:
@Tarey_g, You say Windows O.S is very stable. Why then is Microsoft putting more
efforts & time to make Vista more secure?

Added to my list of Funny quotes :p

JGuru said:
The reason is M$$ received
so many complaints about it's Windows NT-based Servers from the Corporates!!!
The big Fortune 500 companies who are using Windows servers lost millions of dollars
because of hackers, worm-attack, Windows O.S instability etc., Didn't you read the
newspapers . When Sasser worm attacked MS Windows , millions of computers
running Windows were paralysed!!! I don't think you need more proof Windows O.S's
instability!!!!

Pls read my previous posts , why Ms needs to release updates regularly and why do they need to make vista more secure, just for a second think Linux in place of windows , imagine that 90 out of 100 people use linux , corporates/home users etc all use linux , now who the hacker will target, windows? whats happening with windows now will happen with linux then. Maybe in some alternate universe linux is more popular bill gates is not so rich windows has users equal to what solaris has here , visit that dimension and maybe you will know what's happening to the most popular OS there :p .

Terrorists don't bomb vacant deserts they do that in trains. trains are crowded remember? So should we make trains more secure or just leave them like that(happens in India).

tarey_g said:
I love working on windows and have no reason to hate it or linux either
 

mediator

Technomancer
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

blackpearl said:
The problem with linux users are they are very poorly informed about Windows. Yes, they are carrying on a totally wrong belief that windows is vulnerable. People just don't know how to use windows so they get BSODs and virus and all. I m running XP+SP2 with auto updates OFF, autopatcher installed till sep 2005, thats more than 1 yr old. An AV and a firewall- thats all. No anti spywares nothing. On the net, I browse around the most notoriously infected sites like cracks and hacking sites but still I have not got a single virus or spyware. Why? because I know how to use my computer.

All linux supporters are misinformed. They thing windows means BSODS, virus and spywares. Totally wrong!! Like I said, I have yet to see a BSOD on my XP machine.

Does that mean that linux users are dumb? if they get infected with viruses and spywares the moment they use XP, then it seems like it.
Totally wrong! Most users migrate to Linux after getting frustrated with windows! Dude BSODs aren't caused by users inappropriate actions alone, they are caused by lotta other reasons too like heat problems, hardware incompatibility, driver problems etc! Its a lot annoying. But linux has mor elegant ways of dealing with such things. See u urself telling how much u maintain windows! Do u need such maintainence for *nix?? U say u have AV and firewall! If thats not maintainence then what is it?? Can u tell me how much time u and ur PC spends in updating these protection softwares?? ANd then after protection is completed u need to restart again! Thats the limit!
Ofcors u can surf notorious sites. Try to surf them with natural windows without 3rd party protection softwares and then say how great is windows stability and security!

blackpearl said:
Nope, servers run linux because they are very light on system resources, can be run for days without restart and don't even need a GUI or may be even a monitor to function. I agree windows has got to improve a lot on server side, but for home computing there is nothing like windows.
Why isnt windows so light?? Why does it takes more time to load up than linux? My linux is more complete than windows (refer to my posts above to know what I'm saying)! BUt still linux loads much faster than windows. AN dhow much do u shell out from ur pocket to make windows works and make it complete with all 3rd party softwares?? Now VISTA is around, u need to spend out for hardware+software! Do u have same thing to say for Linux?? and for home computing, I suare there is nothing like Linux for me! Just 5 hrs of pain to make Linux complete and then there's life time of comfort and freedom, unlike 15 hrs of pain to make windows complete and then lifetime of misery to maintain it and face all the security problems with it!

blackpearl said:
Duh!! why give examples of PCs on a cybercafe? they are the most worst maintained PCs on the world.
So u see u urself are associating the maintainence factor with windows! I used to be a hardcore windows user and still am. I can bet that I'm far much better windows maintainer than u can ever be. But seeing linux and its performance made me switch instantly. Now I only visit windows to see if everything is working in place, so that my family has no complaints!

tarey_g said:
4 people in my family who know very little about computers, work on office, play games ,enjoy music/movies, surf internet. i am the only guy that does programming on the comp. I have two user accounts on the comp, one for me and other for everyone else , both accounts have administrative rights, i want them to learn and install whatever they want(mostly game demos, and the apps from magazine dvd's). I just told everyone to not to install if anything pops up while surfing ,so simple imo.
Thats a normal scenario in most homes. But there I can bet more than 90% of users face BSODs and malwares etc! But why do u restrict them to install softwares under ur guidance?? Why do u tell them not to install if anything pops up?? SUppose u go out for a holiday for 5 days and ur family computing as usual and installing all kinda of softwares in ur absence. Do u think the face of windows will remain as before when u come back??
Well lemme tell u I got 5 users account, all administrative ones. Everyone does activity normally without my permission! My bro downloads cracks daily and dos all kinds of activity freely, viruses and all kids of s*** keep coming thorugh USBs and emails. Once a week I scan my system thoroughly and make restore points. Only then I'm able to keep my system infection free. Using 3 main security softwares alone has plunged the windows performance.
So u see u need high system maintainence, have to be paranoid about security and stabilty so that others can use the system freely! How can u enjoy freely if u keep visitng only trusted sites with no protection softwares?? What if some best friend of urs made a site full of infection and told u its a great trusted site and full of fun?? What do u think can u visit there without protection softwares thinking that the site must be infectionless??
Antivirus,antispywares,firewalls etc......If u keep using all the third party softwares in windows to enjoy ur PC, then how can u call windows good?? Tell me if u can enjoy windows and surf freely and naturally i.e without any 3rd party security softwares. Why dont u use IE??

tarey_g said:
About the tweaking softwares , what kind of softwares are you talking about? I just use tweakui to just pesonalize my windows experience changing menu delays,adjust hover time etc etc etc many things. Is that bad?

Some new softwares get added to startup when installed , most of the softwares have option to remove themselvs from startup , or you can use msconfig to simply uncheck the ones you dont want from the list of softwares in startup. who needs a special software for that?

About firewall softwares i just use the windows default firewall nothing more than that , it works fine.
And tell me how much time do u waste in tweaking and removing startup entries and then restarting? As for windows firewalls tell me frankly, does it stops all softwares from accessing the net?? Now tell me do u have same thing and time wastage for linux??

tarey_g said:
my only point is that windows despite being contineously targeted by new malwares/viruses is doing great job by providing continuous updates to the users.
yes I Visit any site without any hindrance carefreely etc ,and i do it in windows .
Again how much time do u waste in boosting ur windows protection against such infections?? Dont say that its automatic like someone said here! Even to update it u have to do it manually or else if u make it automatically it will keep annoying u after every few days thats ur protection is low! I'm sure u have done it on manual mode, and that means manually start the updating,waste bandwidth and restarting when done! So do u like such things in windows and such time wastage??


As for those of u saying that Linux boxes get hacked more than windows! Let me ask how many windows servers actually are there so that they can get hacked and why arent so many windows servers there ?? Also its the duty of an administrator to harden up the Linux server! A default linux server comes with many open ports and various daemons opened up! U can just shut them up from command line simply, make ur own shell scripts to harden them up. See the customization?? U dont even have to use third party softwares for that! A simple shell script can be a powerful solution to all the administrators problems! So u see its upto adminitrator. Linux gives u the power to customise the system according to ur needs!
Let me give u an example. Papers and news reports recently reported Kevin Mitnick's website was hacked. But do u know that site wasn't protected by Kevin Mitcnick himself???

tarey_g said:
Added to my list of Funny quotes
Got no more points to say??? So u started to show ur back to the facts?? I guess u acknowledge the fact now, but comments like this clearly show ur state like a kid who knows that her mom is right but still makes fun of her and talk nonsense! Comments like this clearly show ur maturity level. I humbly request u to Please make valid points instead of talking nonsense!!

I too wud like to ask why Microsoft releases so many updates that u need to install continously to decrease ur tension?? Why cant it last for even a week when its freshly released?? And then compare that with Linux.....Boot,do ur work,shutdown! No need to install 3rd party softwares to enhance security and stablity and no need to maintain and waste ur time !!!! Even without updates Linux distro can last like 10 yrs comfortably. I guess even 10 is a much less figure!

tarey_g said:
Pls read my previous posts , why Ms needs to release updates regularly and why do they need to make vista more secure, just for a second think Linux in place of windows , imagine that 90 out of 100 people use linux , corporates/home users etc all use linux , now who the hacker will target, windows? whats happening with windows now will happen with linux then. Maybe in some alternate universe linux is more popular bill gates is not so rich windows has users equal to what solaris has here , visit that dimension and maybe you will know what's happening to the most popular OS there .

Terrorists don't bomb vacant deserts they do that in trains. trains are crowded remember? So should we make trains more secure or just leave them like that(happens in India).
U see u urself saying windows is much inferior than Linux that it needs continous updates and time wastage to uphold its security. Neways if ur a hacker can u tell me how will u attack linux?? Its easy to say such things to make ur point! But there were many OSs before windows even existed. Why dont they have viruses?? As for 90% people using linux, that will really save the world of time wastages! Neways it has been 4-5 yrs when linux really started to gain popularity. We have whole lotta users in south India, from Indian metropolitans, vast parts of Europe and America. But still there's no deadly Virus fro linux. Even the ones that exist are puny ones that need execution rights to work and manual execution! Well if more than 90% of servers are on Linux than there shud have been more viruses for linux. Dont u think so??
And as for the new dimension u r haullucinating about, its actually a reality that will be there in a few years!
As for terrorists, they also bomb business areas like WTC and most business is conducted on servers based on Linux. If they wanna stop the business than its common sense that they'll target the servers! One thing more terrorists only target defenceless people. Why cant they fight the armoured military?? Why arent Linux servers so affected similarly?? For hacking I enlightened u about that above.

I'm not against windows! But u cant deny the simple fact that to use it carefreely and fully u presently need 3rd party protection softwares. If u dont and then say that u can visit any site without such protection, then I can only pity u. U'll be only telling urself that then!
As for Linux, u dont need to completely install a software to use it! U can use any software without giving the final command i.e "make install"! "Make install" is just to bring it in path! U can enjoy ur weekend freely without any tension while the rest of the people work on ur PC and keep using new softwares of their choice! Let them visit the various infection sites. Will the Linux admistrator be worried??

Well for the ease of use again, most people initially start with windows because it used be much popular and widely available! But initially all face problems even with windows, learn it gradually and learn how it works and how to use the softwares and how to install etc! It takes them about a month or so to get acquainted! But I bet if they started with Linux similarly, they'll be much more happy. Most think Linux is not best for desktop. But on contrary I think windows doesnt suite the title of best for desktop! Desktop to me means complete freedom, do whatever u want without wasting ur time and restarting the PC often and Let the others enjoy as well in ur absence! And window doesnt fullfill that. If every one was techy enough then who needed Anti-viruses?? So go ut for a week long holiday and let others use ur windows freely and then tell what u have to say!

There's a good saying that Best things in LIfe are free!
 
Last edited:
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

lolzzz this thread is still running

well...I will just clarify the confusion mehul has

that night; it wasn’t the fault of Windows that my PC was not working, neither the fault of IE7 RC1. I downloaded RC1 but instead of using the regular method of simply double clicking it, I went to the pirate way :D& extracted the files & installed manually. Here I did not know that I have to install idndl.exe & nlsdl.exe before I actually install IE 7 RC1 cos I was doing it manually, but if I had opted for the regular double clicking on the install way. it would have happened fine, it would have started validated my Windows PID & would have worked fine

& mehul, even though I was able to read NTFS using Ubuntu, it was of no use...I was not able to write a CD anyway using gnomebaker, why didn't u said that part. I fixed windows using my own method,

start Windows-> it failed saying normaliz.dll not found-> alt+ctrl+del-> manually install these 2 idndl & nlsdl, reboot & everything worked fine.

oh & by the way, OS was not unrecoverable, I never said anything like that, and I even posted the solution in IE 7 thread in those days. besides....I made an XP live CD now, no more using Linux live cd

By the way, I know u would have favored to read half of Google, to install a driver of soundcard in Linux...but I don't think u would have tried searching for correct drivers for XP at all.

Even I got 3 user accounts in my Computer, other then the one I got, rest two are customized by gpedit, my friends & family can do whatever they want on it...it can't screw Windows at all. gpedit is meant to do that

Linux users truly use Linux, just to look suave in computing...just so that can look elite cos they use different thing then the others

oh & for the topic....we can't say, maybe users will switch to linux if they get comparable features to Windows, cos trust me Windows will be pirated as long as it is this much costly
 

mediator

Technomancer
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

^^Well Yea Linux is elite, if some people get enlightened about it after geting frustrated with windows then whats their fault??? Well for using different things than others, I guess ur jealous of Linux users of having some elite talent !! LIkewise with such absurdity that u said about looking suave, I can similarly say "WIndows users who know about Linux but dont use it have some sorta inferiority complex in the company of Linux users. They know Linux is far much better when it comes to stablity and security. But their fanboyism for Windows makes them reluctant to accept the fact and prevents them to make them broadminded" !!

Comparable features?? All the features are stolen in windows from either Linux or MAc!! The address space thing in windows that it introduced recently existed in Linux far much earlier! And now they have VISTA with shell like LInux one and tranparencies etc that exist on all todays Linux distros !!
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

rofl mediator man...u r hilarious

Do u remember the first time Microsoft showed A GPU driven UI, it was in 2003....as far as I remember, XGL was non-existent then, wasn’t it kernel 2.4 back then for Linux

Linux users want to learn; sure it's good they got time to learn.....Windows users just like to work on their computer, without thinking about how to properly configure & which dependency to install etc. Your comments just make me laugh. We windows users sure think Linux is complex, cos it is...we don't want to work for 10 days to make our computer work the way we want...with Windows or Mac, we can start just right away (this is regarding Mac & Windows usability & UI)

But their fanboyism for Windows makes them reluctant to accept the fact and prevents them to make them broadminded"

yeah we are fanboy....sure we are, we just like the companies to work or make apps for us, for which we are willing to pay cos they deserve it. We don't want to have a partially coded application, cos when we need a new feature in it, we either have to wait for a long time or make our own...well, u can, I can't I will just download something free for Windows
 

mehulved

18 Till I Die............
Since we have been eternally having Linux vs Windows wars I have decided to create one thread here and let whoever wishes fight it out here. Since there are a few people who'd like to defend their favourite OS beside linux and windows I have left the room for them to join in too.
Fight your heart out but don't insult each other.
The first few posts have been continued from here *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38042.
 
Last edited:

mediator

Technomancer
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

@gxsaurav...:D! Dude why are u getting so childish?? First u go out from a discussion and then come back from ur dream world and say "lollz this thread is still on"! Read all my posts which u skipped, may be that will help u lower ur false sense and the tone of ur laughter. On contrary its u who is making all of us laugh here on u. I really pity the size of ur brains and how much inferior u feel when u see someone using Linux!

IF U HAVE THE GUTS then please quote all the lines of all my posts and then speak and tell me if u find anything hilarious in it. "Hilarious" is the last term spoken in a discussion when the speaker has nothing else to speak and desperately need a glass of water just like u here!!!

I myself said that the only thing windows is better than Linux is in Gaming field! CUdnt u read that??? The core discussion is on stability and security! As for XGL and UI it was in 2003. U shud consider the situation now! IF I speak for the past then I can similarly say that in 1998 win98 was a bulls**** uncomparable to REdhat or BSDs then! U cudnt even make WIN 98 stand against a DDoS attack for 48 hrs! ANd stability of win98,WInME?? Who wont laugh at it?? So stop going into the past. Talk about today. Today we have far much better GUIs for Linux as compared to Xp! I guess u really didnt give a look at some of latest distros!

gxsaurav said:
Linux users want to learn; sure it's good they got time to learn.....Windows users just like to work on their computer, without thinking about how to properly configure & which dependency to install etc.
As for dependencies ur making everybody here laugh on u now! I already wrote a full fledged post on it. Thats why I say Learn to quote. Its called ethics. Its speacially for people like u!!
Neways why dont windows users think about configuring etc?? Arent they interested in knowing how things work??
From this post of urs, it looked like u wanna say that Linux users are elite,wanna learn and are intelligent, and window users are without brains! It seemed to me like ur confessing about the size of ur brains!!


gxsaurav said:
Your comments just make me laugh. We windows users sure think Linux is complex, cos it is...we don't want to work for 10 days to make our computer work the way we want...with Windows or Mac, we can start just right away (this is regarding Mac & Windows usability & UI)
I dunno how much u can boast about ur false sense of happiness and the size of ur brains. Neways its only enlightening us about ur nature! Keep laughing. U have my pity for u.
Neways only people with no brains can think that a problem is tough without even looking at it! Neways dont associate all window users like that to u. All of them aren't like u. Those who have got brains and are smarter than u wont even dare to say such things as "Linux is complex" and show others how puny they can be. Things seems difficult until u act upon it! And u come in the category of those people who like to judge without taking action.

Neways for that last line about starting right away...Tell me can u start right away after installing Winxp that was originally given around 2002???? HUh drivers,3rd party softwares...what bout them?? HUh and u childishly speak about dependencies! Read my previous posts I elaborated on this! And in Linux u dont even have to install drivers like that! All are detected during the install automatically.

YOu dont wanna work for 10 days?? Most of windows users cant maintain their windows for 10 days resulting in crashes and BSODs! Forget about the excuse of "wanna work"!

gxsaurav said:
yeah we are fanboy....sure we are, we just like the companies to work or make apps for us, for which we are willing to pay cos they deserve it. We don't want to have a partially coded application, cos when we need a new feature in it, we either have to wait for a long time or make our own...well, u can, I can't I will just download something free for Windows
Guess u have no knowledge of the real world! Neways how much can u pay?? First u bought a new PC for XP, will u buy a new PC for VISTA too?? How pathetic can u get than this?? Well if u wanna buy it specifically for GAming then why not buy XBOX?? It will be less priced than VISTA+hardware required for it!
Neways u dont wanna have partially coded applications, then what do u call WIndows itself???? A fresh Xp was too flawed and crashed frequently. It doesnt have security of its own, but 3rd party softwares. If thats not partial then what is it?? Its like that they are giving out the parts(updates) of Xp in installments to make it complete eventually one day!

I admire ur confession about ur fanboyism and how confidently and easily u can generate other's pity on u.

Neways enough talk on ur ignorance! Please do quote all the lines of all my posts completely before showing ur inferiority (which u termed as laughter) so confidently again in full glory! So keep laughing and make others laugh on u!
 
Last edited:

mehulved

18 Till I Die............
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

gxsaurav said:
& mehul, even though I was able to read NTFS using Ubuntu, it was of no use...I was not able to write a CD anyway using gnomebaker, why didn't u said that part.
And let me complete it. GNOMEBaker could not burn it cos you had no other optical media. You just had one on which Ubuntu live CD was working. Why do you always have to say half the story? Complete it.
 

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
Re: A Vista kill switch would be good for Linux?????????

mediator said:
Thats a normal scenario in most homes. But there I can bet more than 90% of users face BSODs and malwares etc! But why do u restrict them to install softwares under ur guidance?? Why do u tell them not to install if anything pops up??

Didn't get this one "But why do u restrict them to install softwares under ur guidance?? " , why do i restrict them to install under my guidence? bro under my guidence it will be better why will i restrict them? I already wrote that both accounts on my computer are of admin privilages and others are allowed to install softwares. I restrict them to install things that popup when surfing coz its stupid to stab urself with a knife , when you are running the most used OS then u gotta be careful, even if MS provides with regular updates still some ppl are determined to produce new stuff everyday to infect windows.

mediator said:
Well lemme tell u I got 5 users account, all administrative ones. Everyone does activity normally without my permission! My bro downloads cracks daily and dos all kinds of activity freely, viruses and all kids of s*** keep coming thorugh USBs and emails. Once a week I scan my system thoroughly and make restore points. Only then I'm able to keep my system infection free. Using 3 main security softwares alone has plunged the windows performance.
So u see u need high system maintainence, have to be paranoid about security and stabilty so that others can use the system freely! How can u enjoy freely if u keep visitng only trusted sites with no protection softwares?? What if some best friend of urs made a site full of infection and told u its a great trusted site and full of fun?? What do u think can u visit there without protection softwares thinking that the site must be infectionless??

u r not the lone person who visits the ug sites, i too visit many such sites and still my system is running fine, before installing sp2 my comp got totally f'ed up whenever i visited such sites , still i have to keep my system updated so this stuff does not happen. I have no idea what you do with your system with 3(gasp) main security softwares killing your system. I have no such softwares installed. and who told you i have restricted my online fun to the trusted sites.




mediator said:
Antivirus,antispywares,firewalls etc......If u keep using all the third party softwares in windows to enjoy ur PC, then how can u call windows good?? Tell me if u can enjoy windows and surf freely and naturally i.e without any 3rd party security softwares. Why dont u use IE??

why do you get the idea that i use some shi*ty AV or antispyware to enjoy my PC after i had already written earlier that I dont use them and my Pc is fine , i am a gamer and i like to keep my PC at its best possible performance and this crappy programs dont count in that. Its not impossible that my Pc wont ever get infected but it does not happen occasionaly , for the record it has not happened for more than 1.5+ years.

why dont i use IE ? lol
I use IE man. Ok i use maxthon , but it uses IE engine .


mediator said:
And tell me how much time do u waste in tweaking and removing startup entries and then restarting? As for windows firewalls tell me frankly, does it stops all softwares from accessing the net?? Now tell me do u have same thing and time wastage for linux??

Tweakin is what i do to personalize windows , its not necessary security feature as i said b4. removing startup entries takes time from 20-30 seconds or few more seconds if there are more chkboxes to unchk(too painful?) and i have to do this just once not every time the computer starts.So right man restarting my PC really kills me , i died 3 times when i restarted my system last time. Windows firewall is working perfectly so far(my personal experience), in early days i used to use zonealarm may be more secure but it was annoying.

mediator said:
Again how much time do u waste in boosting ur windows protection against such infections?? Dont say that its automatic like someone said here! Even to update it u have to do it manually or else if u make it automatically it will keep annoying u after every few days thats ur protection is low! I'm sure u have done it on manual mode, and that means manually start the updating,waste bandwidth and restarting when done! So do u like such things in windows and such time wastage??

Its automatic if u want, whoever said this here is right. personally i keep it to manual update. As you are guessing manual update is no pain just few clicks on the ok buttton and it surely is not waste of bandwidth as u are stating.
Restarting when done is a real pain in bu*t , i agree. big reason to switch. :p


mediator said:
As for those of u saying that Linux boxes get hacked more than windows! Let me ask how many windows servers actually are there so that they can get hacked and why arent so many windows servers there ?? Also its the duty of an administrator to harden up the Linux server! A default linux server comes with many open ports and various daemons opened up! U can just shut them up from command line simply, make ur own shell scripts to harden them up. See the customization?? U dont even have to use third party softwares for that! A simple shell script can be a powerful solution to all the administrators problems! So u see its upto adminitrator. Linux gives u the power to customise the system according to ur needs!
Let me give u an example. Papers and news reports recently reported Kevin Mitnick's website was hacked. But do u know that site wasn't protected by Kevin Mitcnick himself???


Dont quote me i never said that.



mediator said:
Got no more points to say??? So u started to show ur back to the facts?? I guess u acknowledge the fact now, but comments like this clearly show ur state like a kid who knows that her mom is right but still makes fun of her and talk nonsense! Comments like this clearly show ur maturity level. I humbly request u to Please make valid points instead of talking nonsense!!

You know, i too can write personal remarks which can make your blood boil while you read. that's pretty easy to do.


mediator said:
I too wud like to ask why Microsoft releases so many updates that u need to install continously to decrease ur tension?? Why cant it last for even a week when its freshly released?? And then compare that with Linux.....Boot,do ur work,shutdown! No need to install 3rd party softwares to enhance security and stablity and no need to maintain and waste ur time !!!! Even without updates Linux distro can last like 10 yrs comfortably. I guess even 10 is a much less figure!!

as said before , this popular os gets regular dose of malwares so Ms releases regular dose of updates. I keep them installed and my pc works fine .
jguru said:
@Tarey_g, You say Windows O.S is very stable. Why then is Microsoft putting more
efforts & time to make Vista more secure?

The only thing i say is windows xp is very stable , compared to what position windows was in before , and if Ms is making vista more secure its good.thats why i found this quote funny :p . No offence jguru.

When did i compare it to linux and said that linux is bad and windows is safer than linux, I just pointed out that windows is stable , even compared it to the hard old days with windows in some previous post . But my friend meditator here doesn't agree with that and trying to give my posts a windows vs linux angle , i cant help that.


mediator said:
And as for the new dimension u r haullucinating about, its actually a reality that will be there in a few years!!

i really hope so, Ms does not pay me to brag about its merits . i was trying to keep it light being funny(didn't u notice that smiley) , but your aggressive provoking language does not deserve that.



mediator said:
I'm not against windows! But u cant deny the simple fact that to use it carefreely and fully u presently need 3rd party protection softwares. If u dont and then say that u can visit any site without such protection, then I can only pity u. U'll be only telling urself that then!!

I know about my system more then you do, and i already wrote about what i have or do not have installed in my system and how i use it. I dont need to justify my computing habits to a guy just looking for a clash.

Even if i liked to be dragged into some linux vs win thing, i wont like to do it here with the provoking comments like " then I can only pity u." or other personal comments like posted above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom