The Complete Smartphone Buyer's Guide

randomuser111

Technomancer
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

I'd like to disagree there. Xperia S Adreno 220 is very capable and the proof of that can be seen in benchmarks. It scores as much or more in most graphic benchmarks, especially when you consider its running at 1280x720 resolution. :)

Nenamark 2, GL Benchmark 2.5 HD, RD 3D benchmark all prove this fact. Both are about the same.

Let's compare GL Benchmark 2.5 HD scores of Galaxy S2 Mali 400 vs Xperia S Adreno 220. The figures for Galaxy S2 taken from Anandtech and I ran these tests on my XS on stock ROM with no CPU/GPU overclock. But since its GPU based mostly, even if I overclock I can't get any better scores than when its stock. Only GPU OC can help.

GL Benchmark 2.5 Fill Test Mtexels/sec

Galaxy S2 - 395
Xperia S - 124

GL Benchmark 2.5 Fill Text Off Screen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 312.1
Xperia S - 131

GL Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Test Mtriangles/sec

Galaxy S2 - 9.28
Xperia S - 26.98

GL Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Test OffScreen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 5.92
Xperia S - 23.77

GL Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Text Fragment Lit Mtriangles/sec

Galaxy S2 - 8.73
Xperia S - 22.19

Gl Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Test Fragment Lit Offscreen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 5.5
Xperia S - 21.83

GL Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Test Vertex Lit MTriangles/sec

Galaxy S2 - 8.65
Xperia S - 21.89

GL Benchmark 2.5 Triangle Texture Test Vertex Lit Off Screen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 5.68
Xperia S - 21.16

GL Benchmark 2.5 Egypt HD Frames/sec

Galaxy S2 - 9.1
Xperia S - 13

GL Benchmark 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 8.8
Xperia S - 8.3

GL Benchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic

Galaxy S2 - 60
Xperia S - 39

GL Benchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic Offscreen 1080p

Galaxy S2 - 31
Xperia S - 20

So, you still think Adreno 220 is quite a bit weaker than Mali400 ? :p

Other benchmark scores -

Nenamark 2 - 39.8fps
RD 3D benchmark - 48 fps
 
Last edited:
OP
coderunknown

coderunknown

Retired Forum Mod
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

mali 400 had some problem and was pointed by many reviews. Adreno and PowerVR are available since along time so all benchmarks works just fine. I think it was anandtech that said Mali 400 is capable but cause of poor support (from either Google or benchmark programmers, not sure) the score was lower than it should be.
 

randomuser111

Technomancer
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

^
Well that's what the point is, in real world and even in benchmarks the Mali400 doesn't have much over Adreno 220. No doubt it has a lot of potential but its pointless that the potential will never be harnessed. The same was the story with Samsung hummingbird chipset (potentially the fastest and most powerful single core chipset) but it never really could perform as good as it could have. Same goes for Exynos Dual and Exynos Quad this year.

Exynos Quad is also on paper a superior Quad Core chipset than Tegra 3 is, but its getting beaten by One X with Tegra 3 even though on paper Tegra 3 is less powerful.

So calling Adreno 220 quite a bit weaker doesn't really make any sense as its as fast in real world than the Mali 400.
 

daksh

Journeyman
Moreover galaxy s2 scores from anandtech are old and they improved drastically after ics update. Exynos is way superior than S3.
 

randomuser111

Technomancer
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

^
Proof for "way superior" ? You know what let's not even get the Xperia S into the picture. Just compare the Galaxy S2 skyrocket and the Galaxy S2 International. The former has Adreno 220 and the later Mali 400. Compare benchmark scores of both and find out for yourself if Mali 400 is much better or not.

And btw who told you that the above scores are "old" ? GL Benchmark 2.5 only came out last month and this test was also done last month. Check the article date on Anandtech.
 
Last edited:

Richie Rich

Broken In
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

As far as i know Galaxy S2 I9100 with all latest updates is much better than Xperia S in terms of performance. Though screen resolution difference is there.

can anybody can tell me what is the current quadrant and antutu score of both the devices with all updates?

Moreover galaxy s2 scores from anandtech are old and they improved drastically after ics update. Exynos is way superior than S3.

Yes, from last year htc sensation lost its market due to some issues and s3 processor performance.
 

randomuser111

Technomancer
re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

^

Buddy, don't blame Qualcomm for HTC's own incompetence in optimizing the S3 chipset. Sony and Samsung could extract Exynos level performance from the S3 chipset but HTC couldn't. And it's not fair that you claim the S3 chipset is weak only because of HTC having not optimized it at all. The Exynos maybe far better than the S3 in Sensation and Sensation XE but it's not way better than the S3 in Xperia S/Galaxy S2 skyrocket. GSMArena shootout between GS2 and Xperia S proved that already.

Anyway I do not know about GS2 but Xperia S Quadrant Score is now ~ 3600 and Antutu ~ 6750
 

pratyush997

Inactive
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

Hi folks.. How is this one ?
Xperia s for 22k
SONY XPERIA S LT26i WITH 1 YEAR WARRANTY | eBay
 
OP
coderunknown

coderunknown

Retired Forum Mod
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

For 4k more you get manufacturers warranty. Your money, Your call.

BTW, A BIG UPDATE:
check post #10 first page. A lot of info are missing and things maybe out of place so please help me fix the errors or missing info.
 

bhushan2k

Genius in making mistakes
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

BTW, A BIG UPDATE:
check post #10 first page. A lot of info are missing and things maybe out of place so please help me fix the errors or missing info.

you will definitely not get chipset, processor n gpu used in those Indian phones from any site.. :D i too was looking for the same once...still will let u know if i find it.. :)
 
OP
coderunknown

coderunknown

Retired Forum Mod
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

most of the info is available if you spend enough time digging. reviews, XDA (all are rebranded chinese mobiles), benchmark sites (that list the GPU ---> i.e. partly the chipset), etc. but not the cheaper ones.
 

aAdirulz

Broken In
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

@Sam
1st of all thanx for the very nice post n need a Help
i have decided to go for a mobile bt m very confused
my spec are
1ghz processor
512mb ram min
ICS os
andreno205 or more
internal space 4gb min
2000mah battery
3.5 inch min screen (gorrila glass display if )
5mp back with led and front also
at last budget 15k max
if it is a Dual sim then it would be Best plz do a research 4 mine ha
nd plz i dont know any details like which processor is good bad, gpu, ram etc plz suggest a gwd one
nd if can can u mention the best VFM under 5-10, 10-15 plz
thanx
 
Last edited:

Vyom

The Power of x480
Staff member
Admin
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012


Oh come on...
There are best buys given in this thread. You can search on flipkart using numerous filters. You can come to at least a small comprehensive list of your own!
Do some research lad. This is not a spoon feeding thread!! :?
 

aAdirulz

Broken In
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

Oh come on...
There are best buys given in this thread. You can search on flipkart using numerous filters. You can come to at least a small comprehensive list of your own!
Do some research lad. This is not a spoon feeding thread!! :?
i have done that bt not flipkart at phonecuury n Se live with walkman is gwd bt small screen
 

hitesh

In the zone
Re: Mobile Buying Guide: September 2012

It is written "enchanced" in a5 . Please correct it

Same error in GPU performance chart
 
Top Bottom