ajaymailed
In the zone
i agree, all other companies are so stupid, they cant figure out that size of marketing budget is main & probably only reason for Samsung to gain such a huge market share. who cares about the product, its a krappy plastic model anyway. you just pour lots n lots of money into marketing and voila you become industry leaders by beating old giants like Nokia and challenging someone like Apple. Its time companies learn from Samsung, the more aggressive marketing, the more number of mocking ads, the better will be your product will sell. its pretty pointless to spend money on R&D & product development.Yeah ..
As heard Samsung spends more money on Marketing its mobile products than Apple+HP+Dell+Microsoft+Coca-Cola combined together on their products
The Adreno 320 in any chipset will comfortably beat Mali 400 of S3. Any Smartphone powered by Krait Soc is more powerful than Cortex A9 Core of Galaxy S3 or Note 2. HTC One S powered by Krait released almost an year ago had beaten most other smarthones including Galaxy S3 in CPU benchmarks but it didnt have Adreno 320.Xperia L vs Xperia SP vs Optimus 4X HD vs Galaxy SIII benchmark comparison
*i.imgur.com/Wcie6Mf.jpg
As you can see, SP easily beats GS3 and L is very close to Optimus 4X HD
EDIT:
Oops missed out Nenamark2.
L - 59.7
SP - 60
Optimus 4X HD - 52.3
Galaxy SIII - 58.8
The proper answer to Krait is Cortex A15. So the fair battle would be between dual core Cortex A15 in Exynos 5 dual and Snapdragon S4 Krait Models. while the Snapdragon 600/800 Vs Nvidia Tegra 4 & Exynos 5 octa.