the conclusion of this thread is ' there are many things and events going on around us which indicate that it cannot simply occur all by an accident, but also we cannot prove perfectly about the existance of god ' . until god sends us something to strengthen our believes, which will satisfy all of our never ending qouestions.
how am i devastating my previous post??
--------
let me lay it out to you :
YOU SAID : there are many things and events going on around us which indicate that it cannot simply occur all by an accident,YOU SAID : many car accidents occur and pieces of glasses and metals are being made by those accidents. can u find a single piece of glass as spectacle or a single piece metal as screw ???if the broken glass of a spectacle gets repaired by itself, without human help (like melting it, or gluing it), then IT WOULD VIOLATE PHYSICS (and (quote)"it cannot simply occur all by an accident,"(unquote)I SAID : "er, so what? in accident no one comes back, WHICH IS ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF THE WORLD.
if someone had "magically" come back from life, then it'd be strange."
please donot take things in another direction. i asked u that the products of an accident....... are they usable for any perpose. it was just an example.
where does this belong in the discussion? i think you are asking "what is the use of the by products of an accident?" be more clear
actually u are contradicting urself.
accualy is dolan. i would link to the comics, but that'd get me a permaban. i dont want permaban. where do i contradict myself? just because i pointed out a very obvios flaw in your reasoning(with plenty of examples) makes it ok for you to do the same to me? without even any evidence? gtfo, get back with more evidence.
why no people come back after death by accident, if the hole start of us was an accident?
let me lay it out to you AGAIN :
YOU SAID : there are many things and events going on around us which indicate that it cannot simply occur all by an accident,YOU SAID : many car accidents occur and pieces of glasses and metals are being made by those accidents. can u find a single piece of glass as spectacle or a single piece metal as screw ???if the broken glass of a spectacle gets repaired by itself, without human help (like melting it, or gluing it), then IT WOULD VIOLATE PHYSICS (and (quote)"it cannot simply occur all by an accident,"(unquote)I SAID : "er, so what? in accident no one comes back, WHICH IS ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF THE WORLD.
if someone had "magically" come back from life, then it'd be strange."
where did i say we are the only int. species in universe?
is that not obvious? is your god the same as the god of an intelligent, 5 foot tall insectoid from Vega III? JUST THE FACT THAT YOU BELIEVE IN A GOD INSTANTLY ERASES EVERY OTHER INTELLIGENT LIFE FROM YOUR "WORLD-view".
Because you believe that your "god" is there just for you, exclusively, that means that that god MUST HAVE MADE SURE THAT NO OTHER LIFE WOULD BE POSSIBLE, AS YOU, THE GOD'S WORSHIPPERS ARE THE ONLY ONES WORTH OF ATTENTION. or is it that your god has 2 devotees?? one is you and the other is some alien??
just do a research on human body, then u will realise is it possible to make this stucture from a result of accident+evolution
i dont understand... is this a question. i want an answer? (READ : your replies are very hard to read. improve your grammar, if you want me to understand what you have written. right now, i cannot make out what you want to say)
and u are singing the same crap mr.darwin had song??????? unbeliveable. even he said that he felt embarassed when he sees so much definite sophisticated paterns in the nature like male peacock tail.
please just think in a different way.
oh, please, calling darwin crap. do you even know what he wrote? can you describe it in 10 short sentences? if not, then get the hell out, you dont know anything. how the eff can you comment on some subject which you know zero about?
ok, give me proof that he was "embarassed". where was he embarassed? PROOF. NOTHING ELSE. I DONT WANT TO HEAR YOUR STORIES.
ok, about he peacock. let me think.... THE GODDAMN PATTERN IS THERE BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST CHANCE OF A FEMALE LIKING IT.
real life example : YOU have a pulsar 200 cc blueprint plan. I have a hayabusa blueprint plan. JOHN has a tricycle blueprint plan.
which is more complex plan? my hayabusa? your pulsar? or john's tricycle? (obv, the hayabusa is most complex)
now, which one plan has the most chance of impressing a CEO? ofc, its the most complex... hayabusa. plan
what happens is this : the CEO picks my plan, rejects your and john's plan. Both of you die out (taking with you your plans) now, ONLY MY plans(THE HAYABUSA ONES) EXIST. from now on, only hayabusa will be manufactured, and made better.
get it now? the complex pattern exist coz the female peacock will pick a male with most complex design, whose babies will have the same, or more complex design (babies with less complex design will die out, coz no female will take them)
us "religioned" people still have a majority
*according to poll*
I meant by 'All events and things around us' were the universe, this world, humanrace, nature, animals , even our body, mind... Can u believe these all were product/by products of a big bang (accident) ?? I meant this very well formed universe , this human body cannot be just made by big bang and evolution.
Ok, i am a medical student. The more i get into 'how human body works' or 'what is mind' , the more i realize the presence of a creator.
No, i didn't read what darwin had written. Have u read?
Ok, if someone come back from death it would be 'magical' , isn't it?
Then, after an accident (big bang) ,start of this universe and atleast this earth (as we donot know about any other planet with int. life forms) does not seem to be abit 'magical'? unless the accident was greatly arranged by some one?
And i have a question, what was there, before that bigbang?
And physics law violation? Lol, what physics law? The always changing physics law? Like physics said someday Particles was indestructable and now they can be transformable to energy?
If coming-back of life to an already wellformed human body ( after natural death ) , violates ur always changing physics law, Then , " this large animal planet with human race had been made just from some dust an fumes" does not this break ur never-stable physics law?
U guys when cannot find an answer then use the 'evolution' crap after seeing some adaption or physical changes based upon environmental changes.
That may change a mammoth into an elephant. But no way, it can change fumes/rocks or amoeba into a complete human being.
It was a good decision that you took medicine.I meant by 'All events and things around us' were the universe, this world, humanrace, nature, animals , even our body, mind... Can u believe these all were product/by products of a big bang (accident) ?? I meant this very well formed universe , this human body cannot be just made by big bang and evolution.
Ok, i am a medical student. The more i get into 'how human body works' or 'what is mind' , the more i realize the presence of a creator.
No, i didn't read what darwin had written. Have u read?
Ok, if someone come back from death it would be 'magical' , isn't it?
Then, after an accident (big bang) ,start of this universe and atleast this earth (as we donot know about any other planet with int. life forms) does not seem to be abit 'magical'? unless the accident was greatly arranged by some one?
And i have a question, what was there, before that bigbang?
And physics law violation? Lol, what physics law? The always changing physics law? Like physics said someday Particles was indestructable and now they can be transformable to energy?
If coming-back of life to an already wellformed human body ( after natural death ) , violates ur always changing physics law, Then , " this large animal planet with human race had been made just from some dust an fumes" does not this break ur never-stable physics law?
I've something for you.U guys when cannot find an answer then use the 'evolution' crap after seeing some adaption or physical changes based upon environmental changes.
That may change a mammoth into an elephant. But no way, it can change fumes/rocks or amoeba into a complete human being.
Synthetic life experiments attempt to either probe the origins of life, study some of the properties of life, or more ambitiously to recreate life from non-alive (abiotic) substances. For example, in 2010, Craig Venter's group announced they had been able to assemble a complete genome of millions of base pairs, insert it into a cell, and cause that cell to start replicating.[22] To create this cell, the DNA code was transcribed as a computer file, edited with new code, sequenced by the Blue Heron Bio Company, put together by yeast and other cells, and finally transplanted into a cell from which all genetic material was removed.[23] The cell divided and was "entirely controlled by (the) new genome".[23] This cell has been referred to by Venter as the "first synthetic cell", and was created at a cost of over $40 million dollars.[23]
but i donot hope, i know . and it would not only me, but also all living things he created.
It was a good decision that you took medicine.
I've something for you.
Craig Venter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Synthetic biology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
oh, please, calling darwin crap. do you even know what he wrote? can you describe it in 10 short sentences? if not, then get the hell out, you dont know anything. how the eff can you comment on some subject which you know zero about?
No, i didn't read what darwin had written. Have u read?
The point of a debate is to put forth your opinions, not arguing until the other person agrees. Just saying..
No potshots.EVERYONE, this guy is a troll.