My first 3D TV??

OP
Sam22

Sam22

TV Expert
For 3D tvs Lg LM6200 and LM6400 are best bang for bucks.

I have taken the demo of LM6200 and LM6400 at a LG shoppe recently and I think they are pretty good.
I am hearing a lot about Sony HX series these days so m waiting to get a demo of the same and then will make a final call.
 

Minion

Conversation Architect
I have taken the demo of LM6200 and LM6400 at a LG shoppe recently and I think they are pretty good.
I am hearing a lot about Sony HX series these days so m waiting to get a demo of the same and then will make a final call.

Perform good but costly too.
 

aroraanant

Explorer
I have recently compared HX850 with a couple of other sets(tvs), and it is just outstanding, nothing beats it.
 

aroraanant

Explorer
But the motion sensing and voice recognition is samsung is also very good and considering that sony doesn't supports all formats but samsung does, samsung attracts a lot of customers......
 

LGWRSherlock

LG Expert
But the motion sensing and voice recognition is samsung is also very good and considering that sony doesn't supports all formats but samsung does, samsung attracts a lot of customers......

The Motion Control is not very good....

When I say that the motion sensing is not very good at all, I say this NOT because I'm an LG Rep, but because I've tried it out myself and it's all just gimmicks. Honestly. Then to add fuel to the fire, not all applications even support the Motion Control -- namely Facebook. There's also a lot of lag, and a lot of trouble trying to get the TV to recognize your hand. Oh, and you have to be literally right in front of the TV to get it work properly. Perhaps I'll show you what I mean through a video....

Now, let me put my LG Rep hat back on....

LG WRman Sherlock, out!
 

aroraanant

Explorer
The Motion Control is not very good....

When I say that the motion sensing is not very good at all, I say this NOT because I'm an LG Rep, but because I've tried it out myself and it's all just gimmicks. Honestly. Then to add fuel to the fire, not all applications even support the Motion Control -- namely Facebook. There's also a lot of lag, and a lot of trouble trying to get the TV to recognize your hand. Oh, and you have to be literally right in front of the TV to get it work properly. Perhaps I'll show you what I mean through a video....

Now, let me put my LG Rep hat back on....

LG WRman Sherlock, out!

Well thanks for sharing the info.
Now that means samsung is good only in one field that it supports almost all video formats which sony doesn't like mkv.
 
OP
Sam22

Sam22

TV Expert
I have recently compared HX850 with a couple of other sets(tvs), and it is just outstanding, nothing beats it.

but how to deal with the active tech used in Sony HX850???

Well thanks for sharing the info.
Now that means samsung is good only in one field that it supports almost all video formats which sony doesn't like mkv.

What about LG?? Does it supports all formats??
 
OP
Sam22

Sam22

TV Expert
can't deal with Active...if u r ok with it then buy HX850...but do some hands on before buying

What i mean is here is that I have been hearing a lot about the flicker and headache problem in active 3 sets so was just a bit curios.
Yeah, I will be doing a bit of hands on experience before getting the final one..
What's your take on HX850....Have you experinced that?
 

Zangetsu

I am the master of my Fate.
well I had a demo once with Active 3D it was awesome but I haven't any live experience with Passive..
but right if I were u I wud go for Passive 3D
 
OP
Sam22

Sam22

TV Expert
well I had a demo once with Active 3D it was awesome but I haven't any live experience with Passive..
but right if I were u I wud go for Passive 3D

I have three brands in consideration.
a) Samsung ( active tech).
b) Sony ( active tech).
c) LG ( Passive tech).

Is there any brand which i should consider for?
 

randomuser111

Technomancer
@Sam22

I'm sorry but what do you mean by "deal" with Active 3D. As I've said before, last year there was quite a big gap in 3D performance between Passive 3D sets and Active 3D sets. Active sets had lot of flickering and were just not that comfortable. But this year the gap is very little. Passive 3D is still slightly better but only for those few people who cannot tolerate Active 3D. You just demo HX850 3D once and see what you think

There are reviews that have rated HX850 3D performance above Passive 3D LG Tvs

Though yes, glasses are considerably more expensive than Passive. So if you have a large family then Passive should be preferred as one Sony 3D glasses cost 3.5k. You do get 2 glasses free with the TV but if you have like 6 or more people at home then buying 4 more 3D glasses will set you back by about 14k. Whereas in LG you get 6 glasses free I guess. And additional ones cost Rs.1000 for two or something

So Passive 3D is more cost effective, but in performance not much difference.
 
OP
Sam22

Sam22

TV Expert
@Sam22

I'm sorry but what do you mean by "deal" with Active 3D. As I've said before, last year there was quite a big gap in 3D performance between Passive 3D sets and Active 3D sets. Active sets had lot of flickering and were just not that comfortable. But this year the gap is very little. Passive 3D is still slightly better but only for those few people who cannot tolerate Active 3D. You just demo HX850 3D once and see what you think

There are reviews that have rated HX850 3D performance above Passive 3D LG Tvs

oh,,,I know that active sets have became a lot better than what they used to be last year but don't they still lack in terms of battery being used and flicker at times as well.

Can you throw us the URL for HX850 being rated above LG passive sets so that i can enhance my knowledge in a more better way.
 
Top Bottom