This post is truly for Nvidia fans and AMD fans might not like it.
I guess the rx 200 series is a typical replica of gtx 400 series. Infact worse than that. The stock card gets hotter and noisier than the gtx 480. I still remember the criticism that gtx 480 received when I was going to purchase that. The gtx 480 outperformed 5870 at that time and people still recommended the 5870 because of the stability and lower temps. Eventhough custom coolers were out later they still recommended the 5870 because of the efficiency/ lower temps.
Now I find almost everyone recommending the rx 200 series knowing its serious issues with temps and problems of power tune on retail cards. Though the custom ones are out I done see the temps reducing below 80 degrees seeing how hard amd is pushing its chip.
I just want to know why are people giving more importance to only performance rather than reliability/ efficiency now? Everyone knows the GTX 700 series are very well built compared to RX 200. I was lucky that 580 was out and hence could avoid 480. AMD claims that cards are designed to operate at 95 degrees but will you guys agree and trust? At those levels the card will definitely degrade faster. also the driver support of NVidia is better than amd. If 480 series was bad because of heat and noise issues then rx 200 series is also no different. Then y are people here recommending the rx 200?
chk this link below:
AMD R9 290X Fan Noise & Temps: How Hot & Loud Is It? - YouTube
See all you have pointed out is very true, there is no denying that AMD 200x series cards are hot, loud, in some cases as hot as devil's kettle. operating temp too high, fan noice distracting and all that. the only and only thing that will make people buy these cards is the performance/bucks. And here there is also NO denying that AMD has done something remarkable. R9-290/R9-290X/R9-280X are brilliant at their price point for the performance they offer. you have to admit that there are either no direct competition at the
exactly same (repeat exactly same ) price points from nvidia.
nvidia has state of the art cooling at stock, very quiet and superb temp profile at load.but they claim prices where they have a card which performs less/bucks than AMD. the price-cut for 770 and 780 have definitely put the buyers in better positions, but then again for a few bucks more or less AMD has cards have better performance.
The whole idea of buying a card is now shifted to the explicit and absolute need of buyer
if buyer wants a cool, silent better built card with excellent performance against a premium he will go for nvidia. even buy AMP,HOF,classy,lightning, ACX versions (goes for 780 to touch 290X at lesser price).
if buyer have the confidence, resource and will to negate the high-temp,noise issues against a very affordable price for equally great performance (goes for 290 with custom cooler or AAE3 or CUII , VaporX, Toxic ...way better than 770 with few bucks more) he will go for AMD.
i have seen people in international forum slapping EKWBs and using liquid cooling to use 290 as cool as cucumber, i have also seen newegg run out of stock in seconds after the price drop of 780 for EVGA classy. So its a great great time to buy cards, a monster amount of cards have been sold after AMD 200x release and nvidia price-cut.
competition makes life better