:evil laugh:
-----
Firstly, scientific theories, especially about the birth of universe, are based on some assumptions. Take for example the big bang theory, its already been discussed so much here so I don't want to elaborate it. Science can't tell how the conditions of big bang were actually formed.
Now you see how you do it...
So God actually created the conditions for BigBang and then all happened as accordingly as science say right?
U know how it happens...in ancient days they used to there were only sun and earth. Science told no there are other planets too. And u (theists) came ip with a new theory that God created those planets. Then science told that there are other stars too, u (again theists) told that God created them. Then science came up with other universes too, theists told God created them...do you follow the pattern?
Every time science came up with some discovery, theists tried to took away the credit by repeating only one phrase "God created them"...even they failed to provide some new explanation for it.
On, the other hand, I'm not that good at Physics, so I'm leaving the task of providing you the various theories of how the universe created to our fellow TDF physics champions
(Plz, don't call me ignorant, I still fear the subject like hell)
science can describe all complex biological structures, but its silent about how all this came into existence at the first place, do not mention evolution here, because evolution itself need some basis. What's the energy, the source that gives life to our biological bodies? without energy, every object in this infinite universe is dead.
:sigh: if only you had the habit of reading newspapers. Well check out the 22nd May's Times of India of this year, its in the front page.
"US scientists create artificial life in a lab" (shocking??)
The man responsible for this is
Craig Venter.
Wiki profile
The process of creating artificial life is called
"Synthetic Life"
according to wiki,
Synthetic life is artificial life created from non-living (abiotic) substances. It belongs to the discipline of synthetic biology. It is usually distinguished from mechanical life that usually belongs to the discipline of robotics
Do a google search on "Synthetic Life" and you will get more details.
Why am I quoting him? Well, isn't he playing God? He created life from non-living substances and has put life (energy in ur language) in it. So, I, a n00b, can't explain to you how life is created, you would better contact him. I admit
I don't know about the process very much in details, and I might be the last person you would want to know the details from.
Please contact Craig Venter.
A few more links on this topic,
Abiogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In natural science, abiogenesis or biopoesis is the study of how life on Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter. It should not be confused with evolution, which is the study of how groups of already living things change over time, or with cosmogony, which covers how the universe might have arisen. Most amino acids, often called "the building blocks of life", can form via natural chemical reactions unrelated to life, as demonstrated in the Miller–Urey experiment and similar experiments, which involved simulating some of the conditions of the early Earth, in a scientific laboratory.[1] In all living things, these amino acids are organized into proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by nucleic acids. Which of these organic molecules first arose and how they formed the first life is the focus of abiogenesis.
(on the bold part, does not it sound similar to ur post? "do not mention evolution here, because evolution itself need some basis" )
Please do watch this...
The TED video: Craig Venter unveils "synthetic life" | Video on TED.com
You say science will answer these questions in coming times, so you can just wait and see....
Well, what did I just say, science has already answered and for one of ur queries has actually played God
I waited and saw, where were you?
