^^ Please refrain from making such comments in the future.. If i make any mistake, i can admit that.. Have a look at the link, and then come back.. I am an OLD member on this forum.. I wont just "disappear" because i gave one wrong information here.goobimama said:Did anyone notice Kalpik has disappeared without explaining his claims?
Taken from your link itself:thunderbird.117 said:You fact is totally wrong. Especially when it come to copying a copy protection discs you have to write it in a slower speed. It is not a misconception writing at low speed gives a good quality than a higher speed. It also depends on the disc.
Here are the link to support my claims :-
*www.soundonsound.com/sos/nov04/articles/qa1104-3.htm
If you notice they talk about burning CDs at 4x.. So that suggests its an OLD article! Nowdays, media is optimised for high speed burning only!It is generally acknowledged as good practice to burn audio CDs at speeds no higher than 4x, but it is also important that you use good-quality blank media specifically designed for low-speed burning. Most computer media these days is designed for very high-speed burning, usually over 24x. Such discs may not give reliable results when burned at low speeds.
rahull said:Prinko R.s 16 DVD works for me --But got to buy in 50 ka pack!
It's a Medium level quality plus suits my budget!
^^ That's not how you test the quality of burnt DVDs! You have to have a drive supporting quality scans, and then you run a quality scan through nero CD/DVD speed.. Then you compare the quality score.. All im saying is that a 16x DVD will give a higher score when written at 12-16x, and a lower score when written at 4-8x.koolbluez said:spend some money on xperimentation with writin on a sure-fire non-scratched quality DVD (read Sony, Imation.. the likes) @ their rated speeds. Try to read them on other older DVD drives. If it works without skippin or hangin or increase/decrease in readin speed (try fast-fwding, rewind... then play... combinations for Audio/Video dvds), well & good.