pranav0091
I am not an Owl
The 'supposed' was for the image, not Honami
With the full res image things are much easier to judge.
I see similar but worser graininess as compared to the 1020 - both seem to have embraced the philosophy of sharpness over low noise, which is a very clever thing to do at good-light conditions.
There is a bit of smearing at the pixel level - very likely to be the photographers fault, considering he was sitting on the saddle.
Short verdict : Very likely to be better than every cameraphone out there with the exception of the 808 and 1020. Sony needs to improve the de-noising algos a bit though. The current one looks too aggressive.
Do you have any low light samples' link ?
PS: DO NOT use a PC resized image for comparison. Either the full res or the the processed output from the phone
With the full res image things are much easier to judge.
I see similar but worser graininess as compared to the 1020 - both seem to have embraced the philosophy of sharpness over low noise, which is a very clever thing to do at good-light conditions.
There is a bit of smearing at the pixel level - very likely to be the photographers fault, considering he was sitting on the saddle.
Short verdict : Very likely to be better than every cameraphone out there with the exception of the 808 and 1020. Sony needs to improve the de-noising algos a bit though. The current one looks too aggressive.
Do you have any low light samples' link ?
PS: DO NOT use a PC resized image for comparison. Either the full res or the the processed output from the phone