Filled-Void already did that in another thread. I have been using KDEmod 4.1 since then. The only reason I am using arch.Why didn't you tell us ??? I am dying to try it since KDE4.1 has blown my mind in Ubuntu.
Filled-Void already did that in another thread. I have been using KDEmod 4.1 since then. The only reason I am using arch.Why didn't you tell us ??? I am dying to try it since KDE4.1 has blown my mind in Ubuntu.
In what way is it better than KDE 4.1.?offtopic: kdemod4 is sooooo damn fast and sexy but where is kde control center ?
LOLOLOL... Use Pacific.au mirror.... It is fast.
I will find out the truth tonight.For me, *mir.archlinux.fr is the fastest. Maybe it's cause I am on a different ISP.
*farm3.static.flickr.com/2134/2122604649_e2f8e1a9b0_o.pngYep, its fastest of the whole lot, but still not upto the mark. i get around 60kBps.
anyways, now i have a fully set up machine to i don't need to download much.
i am on KDE3.xx and if upgrade to KDE4.1. how much i have to download?
They compile their software using QT-Enhanced. This gives a fair bit of speed boost. And KDE4.1 recommends atleast 512MB RAM, but KDEmod runs like butter on my system.In what way is it better than KDE 4.1.?
They compile their software using QT-Enhanced. This gives a fair bit of speed boost. And KDE4.1 recommends atleast 512MB RAM, but KDEmod runs like butter on my system.
KDEmod 4.1 on My rig with Pentium 4 2.66GHz CPU, 256MB DDR RAM runs FASTER than Ubuntu 8.04 on similar rig with Pentium D 3.06GHz with HT Technology and again 256MB DDR RAM.
So you get the idea of some speed difference ?
Banned for 2 days.thanks metaaaaaaaaal
*farm3.static.flickr.com/2018/2107306750_134e5f27e5_o.png*farm3.static.flickr.com/2374/2106525027_ff8776f98d_o.png
technically it just downloads from more than one mirror at a time. just the way I like it.Powerpill should increase the speeds you get. Technically its not increasing the speeds if I recall right its just utilizing your connection better.
Because Arch was always an i686 centric OS. x86_64 development is quite active, but the more active arch veteran developers are mostly i686 guys, atleast, thats what their forum indicates. (see user profile, wiki and joined date of most devels). As for i586, well, thats the most half hearted approach I have seen. And a BIG waste of time.KDEmod seems better with i686, than 64bit.
is that true?