BLUNDERS in the mobiles shoot-out (SE W550i)
DIGIT is not very good when it comes to mobiles, I suppose. Whenever you have reviewed mobiles, they have been short and not too informative. In the extensive shoot-out this month, you made many mistakes. The most noticeable sufferer of your follies was SE W550i. Phones that have undeservedly been awarded more points than W550i:
Nokia 7360 - Hello!? The phone has just
FOUR MB of internal memory and does not support external memory. The display's resolution is 128 x 160 and supports 64 K colours. Need I say more!
Nokia 6670 - A very SLOW jack of few trades! I really couldn't find anything in this phone's specs that could justify it being ranked above W550i and it looks like some sort of a mini brick.
Nokia 3230 - In cons, you have written, 'Bulky, slow'. Just saying that it is slow is an understatement. If it had been any slower, it would have been going backwards!
Siemens SL75 - If I was shocked by Nokia 7360's points, I have been floored by this one's! This phone did not even deserve to be classified as a 'Feature Rich Phone'.
And here I am pointing out the mistakes you made in W550i's specs:
BRAND - Sony Ericsson
MODEL -
W550i
Features
Design and Ergonomics
Form Factor (Candybar, Clamshell, etc.) - Swivel
Support for Network Bands - Tri-band
Dimensions (mm) L x W x D - 102 x 46 x 14
(actual dimensions are 93 x 46.5 x 22.5)
Weight (gms) - 80
(the weight is 120 gms)
Build Quality / Fit and Finish - 3.5
User Interface - 3
(K750i has been awarded 3.5 for the same interface)
Navigation - 2.5
(Deserved 5; the ease of navigation due to the brilliant navigation pad had been approved by critics all over the world and you suddenly rate it the worst among ALL the phones you have tested!)
Keypad Layout - 3.25
Keypad Comfort - 3.25
Keypad Backlight - 3.5
Basic Phone features
Display Resolution (pixels) - 176 x 220
Display colours (K) - 262
Address Book Capacity - 510
(it is actually 1000, in case you didn't know)
No. of Lines Displayed in Message - 6
Number of Profiles - 4
(there are 7 in total)
Themes - Yes
Support for Installing New Applications / Games - Yes
Memory
Phone Memory (MB) - 256
External Memory Slot / Type - No
Memory Card Provided (MB) - No
Hot-Swappable - No
Internet: GPRS/HSCSD/EDGE - GPRS
Connectivity: IR/Bluetooth/USB/Wi-Fi - IR, USB
(Need I point out the all too obvious mistake here!)
Camera
Image Resolution - 1280 x 960
Video Capture / Resolution - Yes/176 x 144
Lens Protection / Mirror for Self Portrait - Yes/Yes
(There is no lens protection and the self portrait mirror should not have been a criterion for judgement. It is pretty useless on the phones that are equipped with it anyway.)
Extra and Miscellaneous Features
Ability to Adjust Brightness/Contrast - Yes
MP3 Capability - Yes
FM Radio - Yes
Voice Recorder / Voice Dialling / Handsfree Speaker - Yes/Yes/No
(it's there, handsfree speaker is obviously present)
Talk Time / Standby Time - 7 / 300
(it should be 8 / 375)
Performance
Signal Reception - 3.25
Voice Clarity - 3.25
(Oh, c'mon! You awarded 3.5 to Nokia 7360 and N70, Sony Ericsson K750i and Samsung D600 and a measly 3.25 to W550i? It should have got atleast 4.)
Processing Speed - 3.5
Quality of Captured Image - 2.25
Quality of Captured Video - 2.25
Why wasn't there any marking for MP3 quality when you had five individual ratings relating to the camera? Isn't audio capability an important part of a multimedia phone? A rating for looks is also absent. And there should have been a column for the miscellaneous individual features that some phones have on offer. For example: the startup menu of the WALKMAN PHONES (i.e. the ability to play music even with the phone switched off), the 3D landscape gaming in W550i, etc. And you missed out Nokia 3250. It should have been a part of the shoot-out. W800i has already been stopped and W700i and W300i are already retailing in India.
Overall, the magazine is very satisfactory this time and deserved applause but this mobile phones shoot-out leaves a LOT to be desired. The witty style of writing in all the articles is very pleasing though and should be continued in future issues. Hope someone lends an ear (or both) to this huge essay!