powerhoney
Cyborg Agent
What am I missing... Please explain...
Post the dumbest thing you've ever heard about technology :cool:
mastercool8695
Cyborg Agent
in the LHS pic(60 FPS), the smoke trails are clearly visible as spherical clouds of smoke.
the incident it captures is for a very short period of time, (here, 1/60th of a second)
but in the RHS pic (30 FPS), the smoke trails are not that apart from each other, that pic will be the capture of a relatively larger time (2/60th of a second) , thus less detail
the 30 FPS pic can be obtained by "merging" two pics of the 60FPS video.
I think i further complicated the matter
, but lets see, if its clear 
sling-shot
Wise Old Owl
Human eye is supposedly capable of distinguishing 32 FPS or less. So how does it matter?
Or may be I am wrong.
Or may be I am wrong.
powerhoney
Cyborg Agent
in the LHS pic(60 FPS), the smoke trails are clearly visible as spherical clouds of smoke.
the incident it captures is for a very short period of time, (here, 1/60th of a second)
but in the RHS pic (30 FPS), the smoke trails are not that apart from each other, that pic will be the capture of a relatively larger time (2/60th of a second) , thus less detail
the 30 FPS pic can be obtained by "merging" two pics of the 60FPS video.
I think i further complicated the matter
But, by that analogy, if say the FPS was 1 fps, it would capture the image of 1/1th of a second, i.e., of 1 second...
So, wouldn't 1 fps image have more detail as it would capture for a larger time??? Consider all the exposure settings are what they should be for the hypothetical situation...
Damn, this is so confusing...
rijinpk1
Aspiring Novelist
But, by that analogy, if say the FPS was 1 fps, it would capture the image of 1/1th of a second, i.e., of 1 second...
So, wouldn't 1 fps image have more detail as it would capture for a larger time??? Consider all the exposure settings are what they should be for the hypothetical situation...
Damn, this is so confusing...
when fast moving scenes are involved, with 1 fps you will only see fumes
. imagine yourself. if it is a constant scene(video is not!), then fps does not matter.
powerhoney
Cyborg Agent
He he... I get that... Anyway, maybe it's time to put an end to this topic...when fast moving scenes are involved, with 1 fps you will only see fumes
Am more than happy if my video doesn't buffer!!! 30/60 doesn't matter...
rijinpk1
Aspiring Novelist
Am more than happy if my video doesn't buffer!!! 30/60 doesn't matter...
indian culture is to blame
Nipun
Whompy Whomperson
If in a constant scene FPS doesn't matter, then a. why are there differences in two images posted(30&60FPS), and b. comparing two images as Digit did is stupid. Please tell me how am I wrong.
rijinpk1
Aspiring Novelist
a)constant fps means, same background. here in those pictures the smoke trails varies with time. i meant that there are no moving elements.
b)comparing image with fps is stupid when there are minimal moving objects.but when there are many moving elements in a small span of time, you will see the difference in still images. 60 fps game play and 30 fps game play are examples. the image will look different for sure.
found a website here *frames-per-second.appspot.com/ .check that.
mastercool8695
Cyborg Agent
no, you're right AFAIK.
- - - Updated - - -
He he... I get that... Anyway, maybe it's time to put an end to this topic...
Am more than happy if my video doesn't buffer!!! 30/60 doesn't matter...
am missing the like button
exactly,
so, 30 FPS is better, as that would consume less bandwidth.
- - - Updated - - -
in "static" images, aperture time counts, it is the time the camera takes to click a photograph (in simple terms,)
so, longer aperture time can be considered similar to less FPS
please correct me if i'm wrong.
Last edited:
snap
Lurker
nah its a myth
ASHISH65
Technomancer
At Constant speed,Human eyes stops seeing the difference above 30fps,only at slow motion 60fps offers more fluidity than 30fps.
It's enough now.
sling-shot
Wise Old Owl
snap
Lurker
Fyi - Eyes don't really see in frames per second - they just perceive motion. If you want to get technical though, myelinated nerves (retina nerves) can fire at roughly 1,000 times per second.
A study was done a few years ago with fighter pilots. They flashed a fighter on the screen for 1/220th of a second (220 fps equivalent) and the pilots were not only able to identify there was an image, but name the specific fighter in the image.
So to summarize, it seems that the technical limitations are probably 1,000 fps and the practical limitations are probably in the range of 300.
AMO.NET America's Multimedia Online (Human Eye Frames Per Second)
Source:
A study was done a few years ago with fighter pilots. They flashed a fighter on the screen for 1/220th of a second (220 fps equivalent) and the pilots were not only able to identify there was an image, but name the specific fighter in the image.
So to summarize, it seems that the technical limitations are probably 1,000 fps and the practical limitations are probably in the range of 300.
AMO.NET America's Multimedia Online (Human Eye Frames Per Second)
Source:
What common misconceptions really irk you? : AskReddit
adityak469
Training To Beat Goku
yesterday's story -
we had our first IP practical in which at had to make a program for addition of two numbers using NetBeans. it was pretty easy(that's what I thought), only had 6 lines of coding.
after the class, there were students saying that I didn't even knew that we could do these things, I only other my PC for facebooking and listening songs.
another student said that what was the benefit of making ? the work can be fine by calculators : facepalm: : facepalm: I was like how the fu** do you think calculators are made?
we had our first IP practical in which at had to make a program for addition of two numbers using NetBeans. it was pretty easy(that's what I thought), only had 6 lines of coding.
after the class, there were students saying that I didn't even knew that we could do these things, I only other my PC for facebooking and listening songs.
another student said that what was the benefit of making ? the work can be fine by calculators : facepalm: : facepalm: I was like how the fu** do you think calculators are made?
OP
harshilsharma63
DIY FTW!
^ wow, that's a really tough question for a class 11/12 student ([strike]pun[/strike] sarcasm) 
Last edited:
seamon
Superhuman Spambot
^ wow, that's a really tough question for a class 11/12 student (pun intenede obviously)
I think the word you are looking for is sarcasm.
OP
harshilsharma63
DIY FTW!
^ thanks +1
