rhitwick
Democracy is a myth
This is the look he wanted for the movie...it was intentional to make the camera work as if of a kid is capturing anything and everything infront of him.^c'mon where's the ambiguity of cinema when the camera captures everything!!(either perfect video or audio)
i hated that the stories were spoon-fed.any "arty" film leaves so much for the viewer to decipher.also the fact that this didnt bring anything new to the handy-cam movie genre.
I don't understand...why every diff. movie has to be "arty"? Its storyline is not at all complex, get the basic right...this movie is not something which has a start, middle and end...its called "piece-of-life" movie...they are like that only...starts abruptly and ends abruptly....that is its beauty or USP...
Some like it and some don't...not everyone likes un-conventional content
whoever called cloverfield or BWP great movies? but i'll admit cloverfield had enough intelligent screenplay to keep the audience interested.
Now that is a bit arrogant and without logic...90% of the movies are made are inspired by some real life incidents. Yes the imagination ratio used to be more to make more edible...but LSD is like in-ur-face movie. No romanticism, no masking...just calling a spade a spade...i dont care if this was based on real life events.you shouldnt make a film on dumb people/events only because they made headlines for 10days on news channels.
Not necessarily...what all of them have is a conclusive end...PS: every director always has a message in his film