Disagree with you over there, Tom Cruise is a way better actor than you think he is. Calling him the john abraham of hollywood is an insult to him.
No I have not insulted anybody. Instead I have praised john abraham by comparing him with Tom cruse saying he is not that bad.

John abraham was good in dhoom 1 (which was way better than dhoom 2). He was somewhat bearable in Madras Cafe too.
The directors in hollywood often shows the sense of good casting. Story and other things also does matter. Moreover most of the time they are serious about their work.
Bollywood people these days only thinks of business and collection and nothing more. Eg: Dabangg 2. If dabangg had no story then what is dabangg 2? Salman khan's endorsement of "baniyans"?
The problem with john abraham is that he mostly gets offer for trashed movies.Wrong casting. Moreover it seems he is less interested towards acting these days. He wants to become more of a producer.
Coming to Tom cruse yes he gave same type of expression many of his movies. He is saved due to proper casting & his acting skills.
And hey, can Daniel Day lewis
climb on top of burj khalifa like a badass? NOPE!
I have already answered this in my first post in this page and in the reply above.

period!