Movies Discussion Thread V1: Ratings and Opinions
eggman
I have Yolks not Brains!
But it's nominated for Oscars..........
However I even found Atonement(Another Oscar nominated) boring......
iNFiNiTE
The cake is a lie!!!
^^
Don't go on oscars selection. Some other members also found it boring..
PS: Bollywood sent Paheli for oscars
They nominated EKLAVYA this time.
Ethan_Hunt
Aspiring Novelist
Juno was strictly OK.Nothing of an oscar material but was a decent flick.
xbonez
NP : Crysis
Vishal Gupta
Microsoft MVP
Today I watched "Texas Chainsaw Massacre". That was freaking scary. I have watched "Hills Have Eyes both parts", "Hostel both parts", "Wrong Turn" but found this texas movie the best among all.
Are there more parts of this movie?
Are there more parts of this movie?
Ethan_Hunt
Aspiring Novelist
Which one did you watch? I assume the one with Jessica Beil in it right? Watch Texas Chainsaw Massacre The Begining.It's far more gory & better acted than this movie.The rest are the old Texas series with the original being a bit decent & rest of the 2 spin offs being a disaster.
@legolas: Dude,I am Legend was far from being the worst movie of 2007.I admit that the end was heavily disappointing but overall the movie was really good.
Vishal Gupta
Microsoft MVP
^^ I watched "The Beginning" one. So there are more parts of this movie?
``yup all are plain gory effects. Didnt like'em.
watch the original, its better
other akin to TCM movies
*imdb.com/title/tt0072271/recommendations
Last edited:
nish_higher
Wise Old Owl
A Walk to remember -- i recommend .must watch
pushkaraj
In the zone
I have seen that. Would give it a 7.5/10
Ihatemyself
What?
Anyone in this thread mentioned Haute Tension? It is amongst very few of the NC-17 rated horror movies(This version is difficult to get in India).And that is not much becoz of obscenity but violence
*imdb.com/title/tt0338095/
6.8/10
Well i suppose there is some talk on Texas chainsaw Massacre. Yes there were part two and three in 1986 and 1990 but they were horrible (baseless indeed).So dont watch them. Go for original 1974 if ur a classic horror fan.It has a documentary touch to it which makes it a classic in horror history. If u get sick of old stuff watch the 2003 remake and then the beginning..in order .
Hills have eyes -1st part is terrific
2nd part is obscene ,not disturbing at all.
wrong turn one is good
second is just OK
Apart from horror genre -No country for old men is Outstanding .Ill give it 9/10
*imdb.com/title/tt0338095/
6.8/10
Well i suppose there is some talk on Texas chainsaw Massacre. Yes there were part two and three in 1986 and 1990 but they were horrible (baseless indeed).So dont watch them. Go for original 1974 if ur a classic horror fan.It has a documentary touch to it which makes it a classic in horror history. If u get sick of old stuff watch the 2003 remake and then the beginning..in order .
Hills have eyes -1st part is terrific
2nd part is obscene ,not disturbing at all.
wrong turn one is good
second is just OK
Apart from horror genre -No country for old men is Outstanding .Ill give it 9/10
Last edited: