Dragonslayer
Banned
Will you guys learn to put spoiler tags.More than half of the story now i know and even the ending.I havent started this game yet.
Yeah, but lets say for argument's sake:hey, tkin you played me2 arrival DLC to the end? if yes you will notice a big plothole in the ME3 ending regarding mass relays.......
I totally blame Casey Hudson for this. The lead writer actually admitted that he wanted to answer all the questions, something like having a longer conversation with the catalyst about its origin and reapers as well. But, read carefully, Mr. Casey Hudson (that a$$!!) forced the lead writer guy to trim off lots of parts of the conversation to keep the fans and gamers under speculation, and making their own versions of the endings.
Thats pretty cheap imo. All this time they kept on hyping up the game that Mass Effect 3 is a closure, everything is going to be cleared. But all they left was more questions. I haven't played any other Bioware games but this seems like a biggest failure, not just on a PR level, but on the development side as well. I finished the game pretty fast, at 50% galactic readiness, thinking that I would replay the game, explore every possible place and a 100% galactic readiness. But whats the point? all the three endings are the same with a few colored explosions.
Some parts were too stupid, like blowing up the mass relays destroys a lot of space around them and eventually wiping out every single species. And your squad mates escaping out alive with the normandy, when they were supposed to be on the battlefield fighting with shepard, even if its your romance option, heck what was going on bioware's mind!? seriously wtf?
I absolutely hate this game now and lost all my respect on bioware.
Would like to know if these are your theories or did you just quote someone else?The endgame scenario is Indoctrination/Manipulation from the Reapers (Harbinger) trying to force you into choosing to let the Reapers live. Shepard is not awake during the final sceens!
Choosing to control the Reapers allows them to live. Reapers win. They will still exist.
Choosing to combine organic and synthetic life: Reapers win. They will still exist.
Choosing to destroy all synthetic life: Reapers loose. Shepard lives. Reapers die.
Choosing to destroy all synthetic life option is more Renegade in appearence. Controlling the Reapers is more Paragon in appearence. The Illusive Man's choice should not be Paragon colors, just as Anderson's choice should not be Renegade.
Shepard awakes at the end of destroying Reapers. But Shepard is not awaking from the aftermath. He is awaking from either after he is hit by Harbingers lazer attack on Earth or after the scene with Anderson and the Illusive Man.
Shepard does not awake in the other 2 "endings" because you are fully indoctrinated by the choices you made to allow the Reapers to win. "Assuming Control!"
EA/Bioware not only get more $$$ for DLC for the final battle, but big props for INDOCTRINATING A LOT OF ITS OWN PLAYERS! I do not know of another gaming company that has tried to fool all of its consumers, but they look to be the first and reap all of the attention.
Nope! That wasn't what I found. I played every single side mission. Galaxy Exploration is 100%. But still galactic readiness is 50%. All it did was to increase my total troops which went well over 17k, so EMS was above 8k. If you play co-op it will help you gain more galactic readiness but troops would be the same.@Tkin, Nope, the online co-op is not mandatory to get the galactic readiness to 100%.
Some lead guy from Bioware confirmed it. The online co-op will help, but if you play the single player completely, play every single mission, explore possible every part in the game, its possible to achieve the 100% galactic readiness.
If you prefer to play a normal single player campaign, you can try the online co-op or the iOS mass effect game as well, which will help you fill the readiness
QFT .Bioware should learn from RPG developers like Bethsda and CDProjekt.
Let me be sure by loading up the last save and taking the screenshot..@Sameer : are u sure about 17K figure , Although I am not a completion freak but still I like to finish most parts of any game I start.
In mass effect 3 also I did almost all the missions and total MS I got was around 6.8K something.
@Tkin, Nope, the online co-op is not mandatory to get the galactic readiness to 100%.
Some lead guy from Bioware confirmed it. The online co-op will help, but if you play the single player completely, play every single mission, explore possible every part in the game, its possible to achieve the 100% galactic readiness.
If you prefer to play a normal single player campaign, you can try the online co-op or the iOS mass effect game as well, which will help you fill the readiness
Nope, max assets will be around 8k, if you did everything right in last two games and in this game as well, also readiness in SP will be stuck to 50%, so 4k assets during final push, enough to see all the endings.@Tkin, Nope, the online co-op is not mandatory to get the galactic readiness to 100%.
Some lead guy from Bioware confirmed it. The online co-op will help, but if you play the single player completely, play every single mission, explore possible every part in the game, its possible to achieve the 100% galactic readiness.
If you prefer to play a normal single player campaign, you can try the online co-op or the iOS mass effect game as well, which will help you fill the readiness
Last part of Mass Effect 2 is the answer, he left his post.Hi Guys... Just started Mass Effect 3 yesterday.. with the first of my 2 saved games - import of female Shepard...
Small doubt. It probably has been discussed here, but i dont want to read through it cause of chance of spoilers
I had selected Anderson as councilor in Mass Effect and it was so in Mass Effect 2, but with same save game, how the heck did Udina become councilor? and Anderson an... ambassador or something? or did i mess something?