Italy Won't Send Accused Marines to India

many of you are forgetting something.it is the supreme court which gave the final order of sending them back on the assurance of italian ambassador's written statement not the govt.let's say govt,prosecution,defense & ambassador all were together in this it still does not change the fact that supreme court made a mistake.like some one above already said there is no country(at least where formal rule of law is there) which allow prisoners accused of killing to go home to spend vacation & such.in this case supreme court judges made a wrong judgement & they will learn from this especially after being humbled by diplomatic immunity cover which they like it or not but India has to follow(after all India too has ambassadors in other countries).
I was kidding... btw we all know how fair/independent the Supreme court has become, I think the nowadays the sessions courts are more independent than the supreme court.. :p
Anyways all well that ends well, Kudos to our italian government has finally shown some guts.. :twisted:
 

jaleel

Broken In
LIVE: No arrest, no death for Marines, India assures Italy

The funny thing is, they are murderers, But india assured italy as no arrest and no death.

Are they(murderers) guests of india?
 

Desmond

Destroy Erase Improve
Staff member
Admin
yeah i smoke, but try this. India is run by a government headed by an italian.... and the biggest scams which occur when She or her husband are in power are related to Italian companies..
Do you think its coincidence that Lesser known italian companies scam in India when her group(in congress) is heading the government, when ther are bigger and more corrupt companies (like the American companies which run many countries) ??!!

And now the linience given to Italian soldiers....

You need need to start smoking too... :p

:evil:

She is as much Italian as Bobby Jindal is Indian.....your argument is invalid.

Also, this :

many of you are forgetting something.it is the supreme court which gave the final order of sending them back on the assurance of italian ambassador's written statement not the govt.let's say govt,prosecution,defense & ambassador all were together in this it still does not change the fact that supreme court made a mistake.like some one above already said there is no country(at least where formal rule of law is there) which allow prisoners accused of killing to go home to spend vacation & such.in this case supreme court judges made a wrong judgement & they will learn from this especially after being humbled by diplomatic immunity cover which they like it or not but India has to follow(after all India too has ambassadors in other countries).

Fishermen killings: Italy says it will send back two marines sought by India
wow..i will be damned..never thought this would happen...think some deal has been worked out between india and italy...

Woah, finally this whole fiasco ends.
 

tkin

Back to school!!
LIVE: No arrest, no death for Marines, India assures Italy

The funny thing is, they are murderers, But india assured italy as no arrest and no death.

Are they(murderers) guests of india?
So, why bring them back if we can't sentence them, paid vacation much?
 

KDroid

Cyborg Agent
Won't be arrested, won't be awarded death penalty, will stay in embassy during trial, will serve sentence in Italy. Kya Mazaak hai.

And what right does Khurshid have to announce the verdict? Who is he to say that the marines will not get Life Sentence? The court will take its own course and decide what the right punishment is.
 
Last edited:

CommanderShawnzer

Steam High Templar
Won't be arrested, won't be awarded death penalty, will stay in embassy during trial, will serve sentence in Italy. Kya Mazaak hai.

And what right does Khurshid have to announce the verdict? Who is he to say that the marines will not get Life Sentence? The court will take its own course and decide what the right punishment is.
Khurshid mantri hai re,
And their fate will not be decided by the court,it will be decided by SG
 

Extreme Gamer

僕はガンダム!
Vendor
@previous few posts: WTF? I thought it was up to the supreme court to decide whether the murders could be classified as rarest of rare? Are they trying to say that the court isn't as independent as the average citizen is led to believe?
 

Ronnie11

Judgement Time!!
i think the deal is only limited to the fact that there will not be any death penalty given to these marines....first india needs to build a case becaause there are contradictions within kerala police's story itself...

@previous few posts: WTF? I thought it was up to the supreme court to decide whether the murders could be classified as rarest of rare? Are they trying to say that the court isn't as independent as the average citizen is led to believe?

Edited-Wrong..Sorry..
 
Last edited:

icebags

Technomancer
there is practically no chance to DS in this case, marines were doing their duty, and actually did overdid it by opening fire to boats without being sure about whether they belonged to pirates or fishermen. it will be difficult for the court-walas to arrange the case such that "the marines actually intended to kill them knowing they are simple fishermen", so they may will be punished with may be years in jail considering it was a mistake/ lack of training from their part. (i think marines already accepted that it was a mistake)
DS is given in rarest of rare and brutal cases, so that will not be in this case. and the minister knows it pretty well.
 

tkin

Back to school!!
there is practically no chance to DS in this case, marines were doing their duty, and actually did overdid it by opening fire to boats without being sure about whether they belonged to pirates or fishermen. it will be difficult for the court-walas to arrange the case such that "the marines actually intended to kill them knowing they are simple fishermen", so they may will be punished with may be years in jail considering it was a mistake/ lack of training from their part. (i think marines already accepted that it was a mistake)
DS is given in rarest of rare and brutal cases, so that will not be in this case. and the minister knows it pretty well.
We know that as well, but say if they get 2 yrs jail time, why won't they serve it here? In India?
 
Top Bottom