not true.SC judges don't sit with govt. officials on matters of discussing cases related to foreign nationals because there is no need.you have forgotten but this is one of the reasons why there is a clause of pardon by the president in constitution which is 100% effective against any indian court order including supreme court.in the worst case scenario govt can always use this clause to keep its international promises.Sometimes diplomatic back door talks happen with the govt with the presence of an SC judge or any representative of SC..they are kept in loop about this...afterall its their judgement
not true.SC judges don't sit with govt. officials on matters of discussing cases related to foreign nationals because there is no need.you have forgotten but this is one of the reasons why there is a clause of pardon by the president in constitution which is 100% effective against any indian court order including supreme court.in the worst case scenario govt can always use this clause to keep its international promises.
She is as much Italian as Bobby Jindal is Indian.....your argument is invalid.
i think people are forgetting many important parts of this case:
1)kerala government did not have jurisdiction on the italian marines.yet a case was filed.there were no legal provisions to prosecute these people.
because of this,SC was giving a breather to the government by even hearing the case,and not throwing it out.
and bringing the ethnicity of the ruling party's brass into this is just ridiculous.
Terzi said he was stepping down to protect the "honour of the country, of the armed forces, and Italian diplomacy", during testimony to the lower house of parliament, drawing loud applause from lawmakers.
"I can no longer be part of this government and I announce my resignation," he said. "My reservations about sending the marines back to India were not listened to."