CommanderShawnzer
Steam High Templar
Said Maid/Domestic Help is nowhere to be seen
What I meant was, the normal people in USA don't really hire domestic help. They can't afford, it is expensive just like you said. So they do everything themselves no matter what the problem. Even handle small kids. Baby sitters? They cost a bomb even for people living there.^^regarding point no. 1,you indeed are a bit wrong though not entirely.the reason for getting domestic help is that if indian govt start hiring US citizens then spending bill will increase significantly & apparently indian govt is not so rich considering that ministers visits only for a few days but here we are talking about years(of course even a 2% decrease in corruption in FCI should be more than enough to cover this). as for wages it is more of a technicality as though indian housemaids get smaller cash in hand but they also get benefits like free accommodation,no worries about power,water bill etc which is quite a benefit in expensive major US cities like New York.
My question was about govt. Suddenly showing some balls , that too against States , but can't do shite about the problems pakistan creates ???
Look at the father of the lady blames at domestic help. What I found after reading all newspapers and reports in media that the Lady has definitely done wrong by getting visa on false information for domestic help. Feel very bad that our country man don't behave even when they go abroad.
And anyone know about recent incident in UK where an Indian couple kept few ladies as slaves for many years.. Are we Indians are such evil towards other people life and dignity. Thou I feel bad for the diplomat. But she leaned a good lesson now. Come on face the reality you can not behave abroad the way you behave in India.
Do you know that couple was Maoist?
I also read that said maid was paid Equivalent of Rs.25k P.M which is close to what a fresher gets in a IT company(i'm right about this right?correct me if i am wrong)
Another thing to note that naukars there are paid per hour,and here they are paid per month.
I also read that said maid was paid Equivalent of Rs.25k P.M which is close to what a fresher gets in a IT company(i'm right about this right?correct me if i am wrong)
Another thing to note that naukars there are paid per hour,and here they are paid per month.
What she did was, she took an Indian worker to the US (using forged(?) Visa papers) and paid her wages below US wage regulations. Doesn't matter if it equates to 25K or 30K INR in India. Going by that logic you would buy a bottle of water for 200 INR there (and cry yourself to sleep every night).
Any IT guy sent onsite receives payment which is at par with what a person having similar position, experience & qualifications would receive in the US. Then it doesn't matter if it equates to 2.5L INR, despite the Indian salary being only 40K. This is the biggest reason why everyone's dying to go onsite.
But the cost of living is high too in USA. Way higher. Not to mention the extremely expensive healthcare.
minimum wage is to prevent exploitation of illegal immigrants not persons living in with consulate officials.maid gets less than minimum wage but then she also doesn't have to pay apartment rent(new york is the costliest US city),electricity bill,water bill & food expenses.this is like saying giving a maid a proper room in mumbai(proper not those dingy slum) with free food,power,water & good locality with a salary of Rs.10000/month is bad.
Don't wanna offend some of them around here , but most of Indians have a miser in them. Not saying it's bad or good , but its the truth.The difference between salaries paid to maids in India itself is highly varying. In metros it may range to 5 figure monthly salary, but in tier-3 cities, you may get them for as cheap as 3 figure salary for a month !
Indians, as usual like to save money everywhere.
Don't wanna offend some of them around here , but most of Indians have a miser in them. Not saying it's bad or good , but its the truth.
Now i get what this crapstorm is aboutKhobragade's fathes was an IAS officer with many political connections
The availability of slots was indicated as follows; French -- 2 slots; German -- 1 slot; Russian -- 2 slots; Chinese -- 1 slot; Spanish -- 1 slot; and Arabic, -- 2 slots. The petitioner is stated to have indicated his language preference as, French, German, Arabic, and Spanish, in that order. According to the petitioner, since he was placed at serial number 5 in order of seniority in the batch consisting of 9 officers, the four officers senior to him were to be accommodated first. They were allotted French, Russian, Chinese and French respectively. Consequently, the two slots for French already stood exhausted. Since the slot for German was still vacant and his second preference happened to be German, the petitioner ought to have been allotted that language.
The petitioner states that his efforts to have this rectified ultimately resulted in a serious animosity with the second respondent, Mr. P.L. Goyal, who happened to be the Additional Secretary at that time. This happened because, after a fruitless meeting with The Joint Secretary, the petitioner met Mr. Goyal who informed him that for his batch of officers, the criteria for allocation had been changed. He said that this time, the criteria adopted was to grant the preferred language to officers by placing them in a new order, which consisted of choosing one from the top of the list, and the next from the very bottom, of the list of nine officers. By this method, the order of precedence for the allocation of foreign language to the officers in the petitioner's batch became 1, 9, 2, 8, 3, 7, 4, 6 and lastly, 5. Since the petitioner was placed at S.No.5, he was therefore, relegated to the very last place in order of precedence. When the petitioner protested against this utterly irrational method, he was warned by Mr. P.L. Goyal against raising any protest in this matter.