gxsaurav
You gave been GXified
bikdel said:^^^ okay you maybe saying right but hey, please to give your sources when you are speaking all that........ we need more proof dude...
Search on google & be a regular at MSDN forum & technet web casts abou Vista's technologies, & u will know everything.
and you ever tried aero on fx 5200 128??
Yup, I was using it till recently on my GeForce FX 5900XT with 128 MB RAM & now 6600GT with 256 MB RAM
well to tell you the FLIP 3d which is the most notable and taxing part of Aero even stutters on a 6600 128 MB ... try it out , you will notice the lag......
I wonder why I don't face any lag in here...must be my God send PC...Sai-Yo
Yeah, I'm a certified nut, that's why my 915 chipset runs on 9.0c! WTF? Trying to prove yourself a nut?
Lolz...yup u r, go & read the documentation for Intel GMA 900 graphics chipset & whether it supports DirectX 9b or Direct 9c in hardware. It even lacks a hardware vertex shading unit dude.
So you are saying that Vista "enhances" GPU processing power?
Yup, with Vista & DirectX 10 u can use the GPU to do general purpose math calculation easily which is available in the form of nVidia CUDA technology & AMD Firestream GPUs.
Links please.. I have not seen the things you speak of, so i cannot comment.
Google plz, I m not prakash.
Why not! If it can run better effects than Vista'a Aero?!
Lolz....kalpik, plz..don't argue on this. DX 7 uses fixed function shaders while DX 8.1 & 9 uses programmable., if u learn anything about graphics then u will know that it is very easy for developers to make things in DX 9 then DX 7/8 cos now the GPU is compleately programmable.
Installing DirectX 9c runtime doesn't mean you GPU will be able to show DX 9c effects if it is incapable. GeForce FX for example is a DX 9b based graphics card which will not show DX 9c class effects & quality.