rijinpk1
Aspiring Novelist
how about the 4gb r9-270x?
the gpu may not be able to utilise 4gb fully.
how about the 4gb r9-270x?
how about the 4gb r9-270x?
^^yep but i was really curious cause in future games wont the 2gb will slightly hinder the performance?
^^yep but i was really curious cause in future games wont the 2gb will slightly hinder the performance?
Amd as of yet has no plans of releasing Mantle drivers for GCN 1.0 cardsAny benchmarks for mantle for HD 7xxx series ?
This made my dayu mean R7-260X right? R7-265 is faster yes, but R9-260 and R9-255 is not released yet. not to mention there would be R8 series too, and in that case whats the problem with a R6 or R5 may be so we will have cards like
not only R5-260X and R8-270X but also R7-285 and R6-285X and R5-265X, and R6-260 or lets say R8-270 ? how about R6-275X?
u mean R7-260X right? R7-265 is faster yes, but R9-260 and R9-255 is not released yet. not to mention there would be R8 series too, and in that case whats the problem with a R6 or R5 may be so we will have cards like
not only R5-260X and R8-270X but also R7-285 and R6-285X and R5-265X, and R6-260 or lets say R8-270 ? how about R6-275X?
With 15 cards that actually compromises of 4-5 different cards(rest are defective chips etc, minor performance gap), won't this be extremely confusing to the customer? I remember the confusion GTX560 amd GTX560ti alone caused, this will be ridiculous.they may start a combination coupling standard virtually flexible to buyers when they will come to buy an AMD store or online, when they finally make all cards.
lets say one stub will have R5, R6, R7, R8, R9 prefixes a second lineup will have
250,250X,255
260,260X,265
270,270X,275
280,280X,285 and 290,290X,295
Now buyer has the option to plug and try every combination of the prefix and lineup to virtually simulate an end-product and also test its graphics potential and the derived MSRP, ultimate freedom of choice.