To back up our statements we decided to use a quad-core Bulldozer processor to replicate two possible ways of disabling CPU cores and compare the performance in both cases. In the first case we used a “real” FX-4100 with two modules and four cores, and in the second – an eight-core four-module Bulldozer where we manually disabled one core per module. To ensure that the comparison is fair, we set the clock frequency to 3.6 GHz for both processors. For your reference we also included the performance numbers of a fully-functional eight-core CPU with all cores active and running.
if we wait few more months we wont be able afford pentium processor^a patch is coming. worth waiting before giving some conclusion.
100% trueI think you guys have concluded that this year is not good to AMD. Ya, it is true for geeks like us, but financially BD is a success n is selling like hot cake. The 1st 8 core processor in the world thing is attracting lots of customers towards BD and it is a financial success, suppressing the sell of 2500K. That's why Intel has released a new processor 2550K as a refresh to their line up.
Not all the time market is driven by the performance, it also driven by the advertisement and gimmick you can offer. Best thing is it is now favoring AMD.
The 1st 8 core processor in the world thing is attracting lots of customers towards BD and it is a financial success, suppressing the sell of 2500K. That's why Intel has released a new processor 2550K as a refresh to their line up.