coderunknown
Retired Forum Mod
So, there remained LG Optimus Net P690 and HTC Explorer. Both have good chipsets, Optimus has better processor (800MHz vs 600 MHz), both have same GPU
Explorer has new processor based on Cortex A5 core. so the performance takes a big leap forward.
Optimus has a better battery capacity(1500mAh vs 1230mAh) [battery life?]
should have better battery life.
Optimus has higher internal memory (150mb vs 90mb).
thats a deal breaker for most.
The screen on both, though, theoretically same [3.2"], LG wins here because of more crisp display, and Explorer has less 'available' screen due to touch buttons.
how can it be? buttons should be excluded from the screen area. have you checked side by side? IMO, Explorer's display is a bit more wide so it looks small.
I also found that typing was easier on Optimus Net as compared to HTC Explorer. There were physical buttons for the commonly used items also - bonus.
physical buttons >>> touch ones. helps a lot. while unlocking screen and just touching them without activating anything.
Overall, I personally liked the user interface of LG Optimus Net as compared to HTC Explorer.
Sense UI on bigger mobiles looks far better than the ones on Explorer. Its stripped to make it work on a slow processor + limited internal memory.
Optimus Net has way better development and support as compared to HTC Explorer. So, I personally preferred LG Optimus Net, after seeing both of them.
LG doesn't lock bootloader so trying a custom rom is as easy as root & flash.