Vista is still the most secure OS to date.
- Status
praka123
left this forum longback
Dude!DRM is not crap,it's sh!t on ur 
.just know it before justifying DRM.
DRM is against user freedom.it is born due to capitalism uncontrolled in US and developed countries(not all!).the companies think they can do anything to poor id!ot users-results are DRM,soon there will be brain patented by ballmer and gates,all US citizens need to get a brain implant from M$FT etc.. reality that is.
So in some capitalist countries u see a single human is not respected by any(although laws will boast this) but corporations which amass $$$ in large.so $=justice is right in US as it even allows a OS to bundle DRM!
But let me clear U neither am a communist as i came from a state ruled by Marxist and know the "virtues" of leftism.see the things with independent view,not a fanboyish one.
for ppl viewing the thread pls see:
*defectivebydesign.org
.just know it before justifying DRM.DRM is against user freedom.it is born due to capitalism uncontrolled in US and developed countries(not all!).the companies think they can do anything to poor id!ot users-results are DRM,soon there will be brain patented by ballmer and gates,all US citizens need to get a brain implant from M$FT etc.. reality that is.
So in some capitalist countries u see a single human is not respected by any(although laws will boast this) but corporations which amass $$$ in large.so $=justice is right in US as it even allows a OS to bundle DRM!
But let me clear U neither am a communist as i came from a state ruled by Marxist
and know the "virtues" of leftism.see the things with independent view,not a fanboyish one.for ppl viewing the thread pls see:
*defectivebydesign.org
iMav
The Devil's Advocate
im not justifying drm but ur continuous blame on ms & vista for drm drm drm drm, its a company it has its reasons why would ms want to jeopardise its sales use ur brain and dont post like a fanboy .... at the end its customers who will buy if drm starts affecting them big time the customer will shift to OSS thank ms for putting drm coz it might just help ur cause
but ur limited sight doesnt let u see beyond vista and drm drm drm ....
the bottom line is if drm is bad ms will loose sales so it has to be something really big for ms to put drm and gamble praka use ur rational senses if u havent lost em
but ur limited sight doesnt let u see beyond vista and drm drm drm ....
the bottom line is if drm is bad ms will loose sales so it has to be something really big for ms to put drm and gamble
praka use ur rational senses if u havent lost em 
din
Tribal Boy
iMav said:
Oh man, I am not into OS war, I already mentioned.
Well,
iMav said:
I made it very clear, even with a simple example. I meant blaming Linux (or even Win) for third party software fault is not right.
And you are telling (quote above), you know my intention !!
It will be really nice if you re-read my post.
@all others - sorry for the off topic, but I couldn't resist posting as my friend took things in a wrong way.
kumarmohit
Technomancer
praka123 said:
Praka dude, I was just wondering why you linked to Badvista.org which only projects opinion of foss community instead of pointing to *en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management which presents a comparatively objective information about DRM.
-------------------------------------------------
PS: I know DRM sux big time. please dont flame me for supporting it.
gxsaurav
You gave been GXified
Microsoft is a computer OS company. If they want to sale there product & make money which can play TV then they must support the DRM which TV Channels use.
If they don't support it then consumers won't be able to play TV in Media center. They will loose a market.
TV Channels want people to see TV whether in Computer or TV. If it is TV, they use set top box. If it is computer then the OS must support DRM imposed by TV companies.
If MS tries to force non-DRM over Hollywood, well...TV companies don't care, however Consumer wants to play TV in there computer which means MS gives such a feature, & to give such a feature they must follow the rules.
The consumer is always free not to use MCE, & use some 3rd party application which removed DRM from TV feed. For these they either have to use hacks or cracks.
Every consumer is not a geek. Not everyone cares for DRM. They just want to see TV on there computers & record the playboy TV shows
Is it wrong for MS to comply by the rules & support a feature to sale there OS & make money?
If they don't support it then consumers won't be able to play TV in Media center. They will loose a market.
TV Channels want people to see TV whether in Computer or TV. If it is TV, they use set top box. If it is computer then the OS must support DRM imposed by TV companies.
If MS tries to force non-DRM over Hollywood, well...TV companies don't care, however Consumer wants to play TV in there computer which means MS gives such a feature, & to give such a feature they must follow the rules.
The consumer is always free not to use MCE, & use some 3rd party application which removed DRM from TV feed. For these they either have to use hacks or cracks.
Every consumer is not a geek. Not everyone cares for DRM. They just want to see TV on there computers & record the playboy TV shows
Is it wrong for MS to comply by the rules & support a feature to sale there OS & make money?
Zeeshan Quireshi
C# Be Sharp !
i guess accorking to prakash , making money from software is a sin .gx_saurav said:
praka123
left this forum longback
when did i said,u r again spreading FUD.U and I verywell know that OSS can be used for profit.why again FUDing man?Zeeshan Quireshi said:
Infact what do Redhat,IBM and other companies do?they are in software business but with OSS as their sales.yes.subscription model will be the base for most OSS developers,not the other way "30-day magic" -which proprietory companies are spreading-which again leads to the tendency to get warez and cracks hence a BIG reason for piracy.
what else i'd say?get a life maaan!
*www.follars.com/
QwertyManiac
Commander in Chief
When you don't have anything to say after your subnormally intelligent comments on things which are beyond your medium of understanding, please try to understand that its not so necessary to hit the Submit Reply button. Its okay to type the post and take a screenshot and keep it in your 'Ignorantly Happy Replies' folder.gx_saurav said:
QwertyManiac
Commander in Chief
Yes, cause you don't bother to read it at all, judging from your replies. Advertisements? Meh. Some interpretation.
Zeeshan Quireshi
C# Be Sharp !
Prakash , i would prefer one-time payment anytime to subscription .
And Win XP also includes technical support with it , so if you cut the technical support cost , i think the price of OS will be considerably low
And Win XP also includes technical support with it , so if you cut the technical support cost , i think the price of OS will be considerably low
din
Tribal Boy
WOW
155 replies, thread that went to 8 pages, heated up discussion !!
Now how many replies are related to the topic title - atleast somewhat related - Vista is still the most secure OS to date ?
and how many are personal attacks, irrelevant, no way related to the topic etc ?
LOL !
155 replies, thread that went to 8 pages, heated up discussion !!
Now how many replies are related to the topic title - atleast somewhat related - Vista is still the most secure OS to date ?
and how many are personal attacks, irrelevant, no way related to the topic etc ?
LOL !
- Status