infra_red_dude
Wire muncher!
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
hey aayush, resize ur pic on the title page. its too big man!
hey aayush, resize ur pic on the title page. its too big man!
The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Inc.
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
@aryayush, FYI...
I am using Opera 9.23, and in the About Me page, the three-pic collage gets loaded, but doesnt show full height, and similarly, the scrap entry "About me" loads fully but finally shows upto Birthday entry only... The album looks fine, and though it gave a warning when I tried the slideshow, it worked okay... In the blog also, only part of the pic showed up...
When I tried it on Opera 9, I did not even get the top menu for some reason...
Works fine on IE mostly though... In the blog page *www.aryayush.com/Aayush_Arya/Blog/Entries/2007/9/17_The_fun_kicks_off....html - the picture did not load correctly though and there was a brown background on a paper frame only visible...
Also, dont know if this is the intended behaviour, but in slideshow, if you move the mouse and hover it over the slide thumbnails, the slideshow pauses...
Arun
@aryayush, FYI...
I am using Opera 9.23, and in the About Me page, the three-pic collage gets loaded, but doesnt show full height, and similarly, the scrap entry "About me" loads fully but finally shows upto Birthday entry only... The album looks fine, and though it gave a warning when I tried the slideshow, it worked okay... In the blog also, only part of the pic showed up...
When I tried it on Opera 9, I did not even get the top menu for some reason...
Works fine on IE mostly though... In the blog page *www.aryayush.com/Aayush_Arya/Blog/Entries/2007/9/17_The_fun_kicks_off....html - the picture did not load correctly though and there was a brown background on a paper frame only visible...
Also, dont know if this is the intended behaviour, but in slideshow, if you move the mouse and hover it over the slide thumbnails, the slideshow pauses...
Arun
OP
aryayush
Aspiring Novelist
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
I did not use it for a long time but the interface of RapidWeaver looked quite ugly (plain?) to me when I launched it once so I never really bothered to check it out again. Guess I'll have to go back to it.
Does Coda have the auto-updating feature? That is, if I change one webpage in my 'Sites' folder and then upload the folder using Coda, will it only upload the files that have been changed or will it re-upload the whole thing? This is a make-or-break feature for me.
@sakumar79
I am going to re-design the whole thing from scratch now. I will make sure it works fine with Safari, Opera and Firefox this time round.
Yeah, I need to edit the code right there in the program. That is important and iWeb does not allow that.goobimama said:
I did not use it for a long time but the interface of RapidWeaver looked quite ugly (plain?) to me when I launched it once so I never really bothered to check it out again. Guess I'll have to go back to it.
Does Coda have the auto-updating feature? That is, if I change one webpage in my 'Sites' folder and then upload the folder using Coda, will it only upload the files that have been changed or will it re-upload the whole thing? This is a make-or-break feature for me.
Really? I quite liked the size of it. Anyone else feel the same way here?infra_red_dude said:
@sakumar79
I am going to re-design the whole thing from scratch now. I will make sure it works fine with Safari, Opera and Firefox this time round.
goobimama
Macboy
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
With Coda you upload just about whatever you want. Either update the whole site or just a page. But I wouldn't recommend Coda to you. There are NO wizzywig editing features in there save for CSS. If you are unfamiliar with hand coding, then its not recommended.
And remember, as non-standards compliant as it may be, IE still represents at least 50% of your users...
With Coda you upload just about whatever you want. Either update the whole site or just a page. But I wouldn't recommend Coda to you. There are NO wizzywig editing features in there save for CSS. If you are unfamiliar with hand coding, then its not recommended.
And remember, as non-standards compliant as it may be, IE still represents at least 50% of your users...
OP
aryayush
Aspiring Novelist
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
Be that as it may. I'll test my site in the three browsers I mentioned. If it's working fine in all three, chances are it will work just fine in Internet Explorer too. But I am definitely not going to test my site specifically in it. Bleagh!
Be that as it may. I'll test my site in the three browsers I mentioned. If it's working fine in all three, chances are it will work just fine in Internet Explorer too. But I am definitely not going to test my site specifically in it. Bleagh!
OP
aryayush
Aspiring Novelist
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
Damn! Microsuck!
YES! Yes yes yes!!
The 'Cut' option is disabled in the Finder in Leopard too. Apple rocks! Yay!
(And this is not sarcasm.)
@Milind
I think you'll be interested in looking at a nifty little widget on my Dashboard:
*img217.imageshack.us/img217/9067/latestonhdbitswm0.png
Pretty neat, isn't it? The latest and greatest in high definition, at the press of a single key.
Damn! Microsuck!
YES! Yes yes yes!!
The 'Cut' option is disabled in the Finder in Leopard too. Apple rocks! Yay!
(And this is not sarcasm.)
@Milind
I think you'll be interested in looking at a nifty little widget on my Dashboard:
*img217.imageshack.us/img217/9067/latestonhdbitswm0.png
Pretty neat, isn't it? The latest and greatest in high definition, at the press of a single key.
Last edited:
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
@goobimama, chances actually are that it will work with IE in most cases... Even if you code it specifically with a Mac, IE is so non-standard that it allows "mistakes" in the code... In general, if a site is checked with IE only, chances are that it may not load correctly in other browsers; but if a site is not checked with IE, chances are that it will still load correctly in IE...
Note: This is NOT a good thing and my statement should NOT be interpreted that I am praising IE... I am actually finding fault with it.
Arun
@goobimama, chances actually are that it will work with IE in most cases... Even if you code it specifically with a Mac, IE is so non-standard that it allows "mistakes" in the code... In general, if a site is checked with IE only, chances are that it may not load correctly in other browsers; but if a site is not checked with IE, chances are that it will still load correctly in IE...
Note: This is NOT a good thing and my statement should NOT be interpreted that I am praising IE... I am actually finding fault with it.
Arun
goobimama
Macboy
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
No sir. IE is known to have crappy CSS support.
I always visualise the web page in Photoshop, then code it in dreamweaver and now, Coda, then check it with a CSS validation, make sure there are zero errors, and then finally check it in IE and the page looks all weird. Then I have to figure out some workarounds to get it chopping... Check out any CSS book and you will find that they have a special mention for IE and its nonsense...
The sites work perfectly in Opera, Firefox and Safari, but not IE.
No sir. IE is known to have crappy CSS support.
I always visualise the web page in Photoshop, then code it in dreamweaver and now, Coda, then check it with a CSS validation, make sure there are zero errors, and then finally check it in IE and the page looks all weird. Then I have to figure out some workarounds to get it chopping... Check out any CSS book and you will find that they have a special mention for IE and its nonsense...
The sites work perfectly in Opera, Firefox and Safari, but not IE.
goobimama
Macboy
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
I've been using Adobe's Lightroom lately (at least two months now), and I must ask for one of its features to be incorporated into iPhoto.
Non-destructive editing. Its so amazing. Original file remains intact, but every time you view it, the settings are applied. This is the way future. After all, what's the point of wasting all those gigaflops? We have come to a point where we have a lot of idle CPU cycles cause of these "core" thingies.
I know I can easily restore the original image from within iPhoto, but it does create additional files....sort of pseudo non-destructive.
Anyone tried Aperture here? Which one's better? (Of course gx will say lightroom. Prove me wrong GX!)
I've been using Adobe's Lightroom lately (at least two months now), and I must ask for one of its features to be incorporated into iPhoto.
Non-destructive editing. Its so amazing. Original file remains intact, but every time you view it, the settings are applied. This is the way future. After all, what's the point of wasting all those gigaflops? We have come to a point where we have a lot of idle CPU cycles cause of these "core" thingies.
I know I can easily restore the original image from within iPhoto, but it does create additional files....sort of pseudo non-destructive.
Anyone tried Aperture here? Which one's better? (Of course gx will say lightroom. Prove me wrong GX!)
drgrudge
Another Brick in the Wall
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
^^
Why would anyone want an commercial programs for Personal use PCs? You really don’t need Office softwares unless you are working on something/officially. MS office is a bloated need for personal use.
In my Laptop I’ve Office 2004 installed but in my PC, I don’t have any office softies installed. I don’t need them. Occasionally to open files, now we have various online versions for free….
^^
Why would anyone want an commercial programs for Personal use PCs? You really don’t need Office softwares unless you are working on something/officially. MS office is a bloated need for personal use.
In my Laptop I’ve Office 2004 installed but in my PC, I don’t have any office softies installed. I don’t need them. Occasionally to open files, now we have various online versions for free….
drgrudge
Another Brick in the Wall
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
^^
Why do you want to have a office software to use DTC bus?
I won't even use iWork/MS Office with my Mac. I'll be happy with NeoOffice or OpenOffice. I just want to open .doc/.xls files.
And yeah.. I forgot. These days Wi-Fi is common so even that wont be a problem.
^^
Why do you want to have a office software to use DTC bus?
I won't even use iWork/MS Office with my Mac. I'll be happy with NeoOffice or OpenOffice. I just want to open .doc/.xls files.
And yeah.. I forgot. These days Wi-Fi is common so even that wont be a problem.
iMav
The Devil's Advocate
Re: The official thread for any and all discussion related to Apple Macs.
why si it so dificult for people to believe and accept that i need commercial programs ... the same is with infra; din; and HiH ... arre bhai log i have tried OSS and it did not suffice my needs
why si it so dificult for people to believe and accept that i need commercial programs ... the same is with infra; din; and HiH ...
arre bhai log i have tried OSS and it did not suffice my needs