Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
![]()
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.
![]()
Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
![]()
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.
![]()
Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
![]()
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.
![]()