Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.
Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.
Hello Friends!
Is it better to have an iron that emits continuous steam? Or, would an iron that provides manual control, such that a user can voluntarily press a button/nozzle to generate steam whilst ironing, as and when required, be comparatively beneficial?
I got a Philips GC1905/21 Steam Iron, Philips 1900 series GC1905/21 - Steam iron, for my dad, but while I used it, I was not entirely comfortable with its continuous steaming functionality, perhaps because having used a steam iron with manual control in the past, and thus not having any experience with one that generates continuous steam.