should we attack on pak...........?????????

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ross

Daydream Believer
.....And say things like its hindu terrorists....

OT: BTW, i may be wrong(and please correct me if i am), but AFAIK the term Hindu Terrorists was coined by a Indian(and Hindu) himself only after Malegaon blasts....Guesse who..???
There was no such thing like hindu terrorist in India before...(and Pakis caught the word.)
 

gaurav_indian

CG Artist
OT: BTW, i may be wrong(and please correct me if i am), but AFAIK the term Hindu Terrorists was coined by a Indian(and Hindu) himself only after Malegaon blasts....Guesse who..???
There was no such thing like hindu terrorist in India before...(and Pakis caught the word.)

Yeah may be by an indian politician.:mad: Yeah pakis are making it as an excuse.That samjhauta express blasts were done by an army official so this mumbai attack is also done by hindus thats their thinking.:mad:
 
OP
pr.itdude

pr.itdude

tHe nEw gEEk......ITian
hey, i am not also in the favour of war, "full scale war", india will also have to pay in that situation....
but something must be done........we cant sit quiet now....!!
i am more concerned about the Air attack on PAK terrorists camps......
the other countries can only say to india that "u r right"............but we, INDIA has to take steps bcoz its the indians who have died in the attacks..........

its not mere about these recent attacks,v r suffering from this terrorism problem since the 93 mumbai attacks..............buddy,,,u cant count the no. of innocent indians died since then........!!!:-x
 
Last edited:

iNFiNiTE

The cake is a lie!!!
I have said this earlier and will repeat it again, attacking pak isn't the solution for ending India's woes with terrorism.

What we have in PoK and other areas as terrorist camps aren't some definitive buildings but makeshift camps. Even if we bomb them, whts the guarantee that they won't spring up elsewhere? Terrorists can be trained in any area of Pak or afghanistan. Do you seriously think that once these camps are destroyed, there won't be any future terrorist attacks? Remember, US with all it's high tech gadgetary and intel and its 'War on Terror' started -8 years agao couldn't stop the international terrorism menace, couldn't bring an end to Taliban in afghanistan and also got itself stuck in Iraq.

Attacking pakistan now would be playing directly into hands of LeT and ISI. They WANT India to attack those areas so they can unite in the name of an aggression from India and shift the focus from the northern front of pakistan where the pak troops have to wage a war against their own home bred terrorists under US pressure. Pak already used a hoax call as an excuse to shift many troops to its border with India and started preparing for a so-called incoming attack, Imagine what they would do if there are real surgical strikes.


Those who say that "samay aa gaya hai.......jab aar ya par k ladai ki jaye..........", I would say that yes, its high time that we beef up our own security. Instead of attacking pak which won't stop future terrorist attacks, we should spend money on our modernizing our police and improving the Intelligence networks. Enhancing the security cover in all cities, federal agencies to tackle terror, ensuring better cooperation between all security agencies etc would be a rational thing to do.

As for the people- Stop giving bribes to policemen to get away from security checks/toll tax barriers or get things done faster for you. It's corruption and slacking at the job by persons responsible for security, that makes things easy for terrorists in their evil plans. So be responsible and see to it that things around you work how they are supposed to work.


And those who say that only 2-3 cities will be destroyed by a Pak nuke attack, with India's 'No first use' policy and Pak's 'Anything threatens us, we nuke India' policy, which cities do you thing they would first attack? Delhi,Mumbai, Bangalore,Kolkata??? What about the millions of people who will lose their lives? And even if we fire away tens of nukes at their cities, it won't end the nuke war coz nuclear missile launchers aren't kept in cities but in remote places which could be used to launch further strikes. So any war which even has a remote possiblity to escalate into a nuclear war is a Strict NO-NO.
 
OP
pr.itdude

pr.itdude

tHe nEw gEEk......ITian
@ infinite......i really appreciate ur security knowledge....!!
but u ppl really think pak will gonna to help us to catch those militants/master-minds....???

*preview.shareapic.net/preview4/013226890.jpg
*preview.shareapic.net/preview4/013226977.jpg
 
Last edited:

oval_man

Journeyman
Slightly off the topic:

During Mumbai Terrorist Attack,NSG commandos fought and the 'war' came to an end with

many loss of life-------------This is a known Fact,

Now,we all know NSG commandos comprise of many trained people from various states of India like BIHAR,UP,TN,Karnataka,Kerala and so on...

Now,the question is What happened to our DADA 'Thackarey & co' who opposed other state Indians entering Mumbai & Maharashtra?

NOw,how our Mumbaiites will deal such campaign against other state Indians?
 

m-jeri

Caballero de Real Madrid
In one word. YES.

We should have done this years ago.
But it will never mean it be the end of anything. it will just trigger a lot more new movements.

The only thing abt their govt is their active support of terrorism and harboring fugitives. for that a war is not the answer though. it be having strong and correct diplomatic and strategic movements. political and military.

Moreover. even before taking the war to others it be better to start from inside this nation. the level of corruption, racism, patriotism have to be checked again on each indians. failing to do so. even a 50 year campaign on the enemy will not result in a better nation. just a torn apart good for nothing one.

Protect the citizens. Modernize and arm the domestic security. 3 days it took for them. inside the nation. if one politician was there we would have seen far better results.

Even after the incident CNN done a report on the security of various hot spots in india. nothing is different.
 

dreamcatcher

Rockin g33k
Cummon guys,you actually serious?? India doesnt have the horsepower to floor Pakistan, and thats a fact.US will be the sole gainer if India ever decides to lanch an attack.they will be supplying arms to pakistan and India alike and thereby gaining huge sums in the process. And what about us?? Imagine the amount of destruction it shall cause to the Indian subcontinent if the terrorists retort bck with missiles and fighter plnes of their own?? The militants are nothing but a rogue arm of the ISI, who gives a gurantee that Pakistan wont nuke us??


Look at the broader side of the matter and not take a hunch for a decision. If in the course of the attack, China decides to run amock, what shall be our plight??? We cant attack them unless we have heavy backing from all quarters, which as of now, seems a distant possibility..
 

Sridhar_Rao

In the zone
Hi friends,
we all have varied opinion on these issues. I have created an online opinion poll on terrorism in India. I wanted to try out PHP and MySQL and used these to make one.

I strongly urge you to visit it and participate in the opinion poll on terror. Visit here: www.microrao.com/terror_poll.php
 

Chintu08

Banned
justa curiosity.
when someone dies in pakistan, their relative, friends or neighbours.. do they celebrate that? :lmao:
wtf do they eat for food? sick noobs
 

afonofa

Journeyman
^^ you think pak has control over its nukes? i think US controls pakistan's n-button. its highly improbabl for US to let pakistan's unstable govt to govt to control pak's nukess
pakistan's govt. has never been in control of their nukes! :D It's always been their army. If I had to bet my money on some other country controlling pakistan's nukes, then I would bet on china.
should we go for a final change, should we attack on pakistan and destroys all the terrorists camp.....????

but there is another side of coin, the world is facing economic crisis,india too. so is this the right tym for the attack, we will also suffer a gr8 loss in terms of money n soldiers....!!! and both india and pak are nuclear power today....!!!

will this not agitate the world war......??? As America is supporting india and there are a lots of anti-american countries.........who would be with pak, muslim countries basically..........!!!

Also this is a matter of indian pride, so y dont we...........???
Yes to military action by India, No to a full scale war against pakistan. But military action should not be limited to only destroying terrorist camps because as long as that territory is under pakistan's control, the terrorist camps will be setup again. Expand the scope and take control over PoK and over time, with the right political will, integrate it politically, economically and culturally with J&K and the rest of India.

India's economy will not go into recession due to the global economic crisis. It's growth will slow down but it will still continue to grow. Compare that to pakistan's economy which has had to borrow money from the IMF, without which it would have collapsed in one month(not exaggerating here). The situation is that bad for them. Even the pakistani army needs to pay its soldiers. Any conflict with India in Pok, if it drags on too long will cause a lot more problems economically, for pakistan than for India.

If the attacks on the world trade center and the subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq did not cause Muslim nations to engage the rest of the world in WWIII, then a conflict between India and pakistan over PoK will definitely not spark it off. Infact India has good relations with all the major Muslim nations. As for support to pakistan, the recent failure of the "Friends of pakistan" effort(organized by pakistan to collect funds for its economy) following which it had to beg from the IMF should be indication enough of the support that pakistan has.

Indian pride? Do we still understand what pride means? Besides if pride is to be the reason for getting into a conflict with pakistan, then you can be sure that we will not win. But if we get into it with the sole purpose of doing the right thing, then victory will be ours.

If they attack with nuclear weapons then their country will be history.They can destroy maximum 2-3 indian cities but they wont be alive to see all this.:rolleyes:
pakistan must be having around 50-75 nuclear warheads or even more. It takes only a few minutes for their missiles to reach (every part of)India. So in the event of a pre-emptive nuclear attack by pakistan, we will be losing a lot more than 2-3 cities. All the major cities, the capital of every state of India, a huge chunk of our armed forces, including a lot of our missiles and nuclear capable fighters. Of course India will still be left with enough of a nuclear arsenal to effectively ensure the complete annihilation of pakistan and the idea of pakistan.

In the aftermath, the entire subcontinent will be Indian territory, including Bangladesh. However the subcontinent which you will be left with(because I would have been vaporised in the nuke attack on Mumbai :p), will not be the fertile lands, rich in natural resources & culture that we know today. As most cities are located along the banks of rivers, the river system in the subcontinent will be polluted for a long long time to come. For eg. the Ganga(ganges) will cease to be a perrenial river as the glaciers which feed it during the summer would have melted away. One only needs to look at geography textbooks to understand the significance of rivers to Indian civilisation. The radiation will be effectively contained within the Indian subcontinent due to the Himalayas on one side and on the other side the mountain ranges in the NWFP of present day pakistan. So china will hardly be affected. There will forever be genetic abnormalities in future Indian generations. This will make it even more difficult for the survivors to rebuild India and it will be even later before they can dream of catching up with USA & china and the rest of the world, who will be inhabiting colonies on Mars before Akhand Bharat can again launch a Chandrayaan. It will be an Akhand Bharat alright, but instead of being a regenerated Bharat, it will be a degenerated Bharat.

UN and Nukes are two sides of a coin. Use nukes and Un will turn their head opposite.. :neutral:
India has a known no-first use policy about nuclear weapons. The world knows that a nuclear war will never be started by India. Every part of the world whose voice actually matters in the UN, is already facing problems caused because of not listening to what India has been saying about pakistan for such a long time. In the event of a nuclear war in the subcontinent, the UN has no reason to turn away from India because pakistan would be the rogue.

this is not the way to deal the situation, remember that pak is a nuke capale country, and there are very high chances that these terrorists will be having the same nuke weapons, recently US intel report says it suspects that they may posses nukes.
If terrorists had nukes, they would have used them by now. They don't have them yet. The US intel report says that the greatest threat of nuclear and biological terrorism comes from pakistani weapons falling into the hands of such terrorists. It's even more reason for the U.S.A to ensure that pakistani nukes are safe, which in turn is better for India. But pakistan will never allow, even the USA, to take control of its nukes. They would rather engage in a nuclear war with India or proliferate those nukes to terrorists. So its in India's interest not to wait for the US to do something but to go in and ensure its own security. India cannot be secure as long as Pok is not integrated with J&K. Because the people in J&K will continue to want to be in contact with people in PoK, so it is a political compulsion to keep the border open. Once we have that territory we can seal off the border with pakistan if we deem it necessary and not have to worry about people in J&K willing to compromise India's security with their desire to be in contact with their relatives in PoK. This will not guarantee India's security against nuclear terrorism but it will go a very long way in making it as difficult as possible.

Today had Pok been under India's control, we would have had direct land access to Afghanistan and the oil rich countries of central asia. pakistan would have been geographically cut off from china. The USA would not have had to make pakistan its "most important ally against terror". The USA has had to do that because the only way they can maintain the supply line to their troops in Afghanistan is through pakistani territory. The billions which the USA has given to pakistan would have been India's :D. But today the situation is completely opposite and it needs to be changed to our advantage.

the solution to this is

1. we have a terrorist in our custody that can tell where are the camps
2. our intel has very strng proof against terror camps in pak. give all the proof to all the world or best the UN and create a preassure on them to all the countries come under one roof even the pak and destroy their terror camps.
1. It's not possible for him to tell us the exact location of the terrorist camp where he was trained, let alone the location of all the terrorist camps operating out of pakistani controlled territory. Atmost he can only tell us the general location where the camp is located but not the exact coordinates.

2. (Been there, done that, Failed)^n

I have said this earlier and will repeat it again, attacking pak isn't the solution for ending India's woes with terrorism.
pakistan is increasingly becoming the epicenter of international terrorism. In India's case, pakistan is the culprit. There is no need to attack the whole of pakistan. India just has to take control of PoK.
What we have in PoK and other areas as terrorist camps aren't some definitive buildings but makeshift camps. Even if we bomb them, whts the guarantee that they won't spring up elsewhere? Terrorists can be trained in any area of Pak or afghanistan. Do you seriously think that once these camps are destroyed, there won't be any future terrorist attacks?
There are definitive buildings where indoctrination is done. The camps where physical training is imparted are also infrastructure. If we don't have control over PoK and just bombed terrorist camps then they will be setup again but that does not mean we should not bomb those camps, because it will take them time to setup the camps(why do you cut your nails when they keep growing back?). If we did have control over PoK then we can ensure that indoctrination does not happen on the scale at which it is happening now. It will also mean we can club the Kashmiri "freedom struggle" with other such movements in India and classify them as an internal matter. Which country is bothered about the naxalite movement in India? If we destroy a naxalite camp in India, nobody is going to question us as it is our internal matter. But if we destroy even one terrorist camp in PoK then directly or indirectly it will cause a lot of international headache for us because that territory is under pakistani control.
Remember, US with all it's high tech gadgetary and intel and its 'War on Terror' started -8 years agao couldn't stop the international terrorism menace, couldn't bring an end to Taliban in afghanistan and also got itself stuck in Iraq.
The U.S.A hasn't been able to eradicate international terrorism. Even with all their money and technology, it is too big a task even for them. But the steps which they have taken have ensured that there hasn't been a single attack on mainland U.S since then. The motive for the invasion of Iraq is debatable, but invading Afghanistan, which at that time was the breeding ground for al-qaida is one of the most important steps.
Attacking pakistan now would be playing directly into hands of LeT and ISI. They WANT India to attack those areas so they can unite in the name of an aggression from India and shift the focus from the northern front of pakistan where the pak troops have to wage a war against their own home bred terrorists under US pressure. Pak already used a hoax call as an excuse to shift many troops to its border with India and started preparing for a so-called incoming attack, Imagine what they would do if there are real surgical strikes.
Even better for India to the turn the tables on pakistan. India has very good relations with Iran. We are(or already done) building a road which will help us access Afghanistan via Iran. Should pakistan threaten to divert( or divert) troops to the Indo-pak border on account of aggression by India, India should pledge to send in(or send in) an equal number of troops into Afghanistan to help NATO forces in the war on terror. With India's mediation, it will not be impossible for the USA and Iran to come to an agreement on supply lines for NATO forces in Afghanistan via Iran, considering that Iran also has a lot to gain from this. This move by India will ensure that the USA is not dependent on pakistan for the war on terror and are still able to exert and maintain diplomatic, economic as well as military pressure on pakistan. Another advantage will be that in a PoK conflict, pakistan will be less inclined to divert troops to the Indo-pak border when it has Indian troops on its western border as well.
I would say that yes, its high time that we beef up our own security. Instead of attacking pak which won't stop future terrorist attacks, we should spend money on our modernizing our police and improving the Intelligence networks. Enhancing the security cover in all cities, federal agencies to tackle terror, ensuring better cooperation between all security agencies etc would be a rational thing to do.
Agreed that we definitely need to beef up our internal security. But installing a firewall on one system while there is an infecting system on the lan will just not be enough. No matter how strong the firewall, eventually it will be bypassed. You have to clean up the infector while simultaneously improving the defenses of the infectee. :p
As for the people- Stop giving bribes to policemen to get away from security checks/toll tax barriers or get things done faster for you. It's corruption and slacking at the job by persons responsible for security, that makes things easy for terrorists in their evil plans.
A corrupt man will always find a way to be corrupt even in the most honest of societies...and an honest man can also be forced to become corrupt if his honesty does not help pay the bills :D. So its not only corruption which is a problem. Eg. If security forces were paid better, they would be more motivated to avoid corruption and stop taking money to allow illegal immigrants into India. But if the people who risk their lives are being paid less than our MLA's and MP's then what else should we expect.
And even if we fire away tens of nukes at their cities, it won't end the nuke war coz nuclear missile launchers aren't kept in cities but in remote places which could be used to launch further strikes. So any war which even has a remote possiblity to escalate into a nuclear war is a Strict NO-NO.
It is not necessary to take out pakistani nukes with Indian nukes. The U.S.A and India can engage in conventional strikes to take out atleast some number of pakistani nukes. Assuming that pakistan is able to launch every single nuclear weapon, there is still a fixed limit to how many nuclear strikes pakistan can launch.

[a] If pakistan was to launch nuclear strikes on Indian military assets then India's nuclear strikes will not be against pakistani cities(atleast not until absolutely required). The first retaliatory strikes will be directed towards whatever nuclear arsenal they have remaining(if they even reserve any for later) and then against their already weak(compared to India) conventional military. This further limits the number of nuclear strikes by pakistan.

If pakistan would be foolish enough to exhaust their nuclear arsenal and launch a nuclear strike primarily(or only) against Indian cities, there would be no need for India to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike against pakistani cities. We can just as easily defeat pakistan with conventional forces(with a few nuclear strikes) and conserve our nuclear strength as a deterrent against any chinese opportunism during the war. That means we would then be able to use pakistani resources to rebuild what we would lose in a pakistani nuclear strike.

[c] If pakistan was to launch nuclear strikes against all Indian assets(cities, military etc.), even in that scenario they will be limited to how much of India they can take out before...So any nuclear strike by pakistan will result in their complete and utter defeat.

If India plays it correctly, then in the current situation, both heads & tails can be ours. What we do need is the right political will and for the common people of India to have the heart to take the enemy's punches before we get the opportunity to go in for the KO(knockout).

The people of India, who live in cities should have the least to fear about a nuclear war. If your city is hit, you will be vaporised long before your skin can signal to your brain that you are burning up. It's only those who feel they have a high chance of surviving a nuclear war with pakistan, who have to be worried. The rest of you need not & should not let the fear of a nuclear war stop you from calling for military action by India to take control of PoK, bindaas rehne ka, bole toh...live free and die hard! :D

India doesnt have the horsepower to floor Pakistan, and thats a fact. Imagine the amount of destruction it shall cause to the Indian subcontinent if the terrorists retort bck with missiles and fighter plnes of their own?? The militants are nothing but a rogue arm of the ISI, who gives a gurantee that Pakistan wont nuke us??

If in the course of the attack, China decides to run amock, what shall be our plight??? We cant attack them unless we have heavy backing from all quarters, which as of now, seems a distant possibility..
Barring nukes, the fact is that India does have good conventional military superiority, probably even enough to reintegrate pakistan into India. Even if we assume we don't have conventional military superiority to reintegrate the whole of pakistan into India, we still have more than enough to take over control of PoK. Terrorists don't have fighter planes. LTTE is the only terrorist organisation to have its own fledgling airforce.

This conventional superiority gap has been narrowing over the years. The longer we wait, the smaller the window of opportunity. Today their airforce cannot compete with ours let alone their navy. So even incase of a full-n-final nuclear war we will still be left with enough to completely annihilate pakistan and still rebuild ourselves. But tomorrow the situation could be completely different. They will be able to increase their nuclear arsenal and improve delivery systems to the point beyond which even India will not be able to rebuild itself incase of a nuclear war. Once we reach that point and we still don't have control of PoK, then there is absolutely no hope for India and her people to live without the fear of terrorism. Because then it will not be possible for us to take any military action even if we madly wanted to and without Indian control over PoK, terrorism will never end for Indians.

India enjoys the same nuclear non-strike guarantee which china does, in the event that china should try to take control over the disputed border areas through a conventional military attack. PoK is disputed territory. pakistan has been foolish enough to harbour terrorism to reach its goals, but they are not foolish enough to engage in a nuclear strike over disputed territory. As long as India maintains its no-first use policy and keeps the military strike restricted to a battle for PoK and not a war for the state of pakistan, India can be assured of having to engage only conventional and irregular pakistani military forces. Only when pakistan's existence is threatened will they nuke India. PoK is more of an obsession for pakistan and a means to achieve a more devious objective. They think since they have 1/3rd of the state, they can gain control over the remaining territory by waging a proxy war. If we control PoK and J&K, then over time they will accept it and focus their energy on building pakistan instead of destroying India and so will the people of J&K(the high turnout in the current elections in J&K is an indication of this). The lowest turnout in J&K elections have been in districts where people still live (literally) in huts made of stones and scraps, without electricity, piped water etc. The very basic things which we take for granted in our day to day lives. All this can be changed but again we need the right political will. (This is where the "social scheming" of pro-hindutva parties fails miserably :D)

Our politicians keep talking of how a stable pakistan is in India's interest. But it is the opposite which is true. More stable pakistan is, better its economy, better its conventional military vis-a-vis India, more potent will be its nuclear arsenal and EVEN MORE will be their support for terrorism directed towards India. Even if in some alternate universe we consider giving the whole of J&K to pakistan, it will not stop terrorism emanating from pakistan. pakistan will then try to divide India further and further until pakistan is the largest country in the subcontinent.

On the other hand we cannot even be sure pakistan will not nuke us even without any military provocation on our part.
It is well known that Pakistan does not have a “No First Use Policy.” Pakistani nuclear weapons will be used, according to Gen. Kidwai, only “if the very existence of Pakistan as a state is at stake.” This has been detailed by Gen. Kidwai as follows:

“Nuclear weapons are aimed solely at India. In case that deterrence fails, they will be used if

a. India attacks Pakistan and conquers a large part of its territory (space threshold)

b. India destroys a large part either of its land or air forces (military threshold)

c. India proceeds to the economic strangling of Pakistan (economic strangling)

d. India pushes Pakistan into political destabilization or creates a large scale internal subversion in Pakistan (domestic destabilization)
We already hear of all the nonsense anti-India propaganda by the pakistani media. What is to stop them from blaming India(which they already do) for pakistan's continued economic and domestic instability and coming up with propaganda to cultivate public opinion for a war against India? They don't even need public opinion for that. India could be hit by a pre-emptive nuclear strike when pakistan may be undergoing an economic collapse or intense domestic strife, at a time when we would not even be expecting it. And it will be a nuclear strike if pakistan starts the war, because starting a conventional war against India is futile for them.

If India thinks what happened in Mumbai is an equivalent of the 9/11 terrorist attack, then you are sorely mistaken. The scale and scope of 9/11 just cannot be compared to 26/11. What happened in Mumbai was only a test run on India. India's 9/11 is still to come and soon. It will be deadlier than anything which has happened anywhere in the world. Considering the appalling state of security in India, it could even be a pakistani pre-emptive strike disguised as nuclear terrorism. Those who advocate not going to war against pakistan are right, however taking no military action is nothing but signing of our last will as a civilisation.

Even though some time has passed and the heat has dissipated somewhat but its not gone completely, so we still have time to act. Even if we don't act now, if there is one thing India needs to learn from what happened in Mumbai, its the fact that an even deadlier terrorist strike will happen and when that happens, India should be ready with its military action plan to immediately take control of PoK and to deal with any consequences thereafter.

"Strike while the iron is hot"

...or wait for the blue boy to descend for the final time...
 

gaurav_indian

CG Artist
@afonofa sach sach bata bhai yeh post tune kitne weeks mein likhi?:eek: Koi competition chal raha hai kya.:mad:

Edit karke neeche summary likh yaar.:)
 

afonofa

Journeyman
^^:p:D:p thoda zyada hogya...

I was thinking about posting in this thread for quite some time and in meanwhile many people had their say. So I wanted to agree/disagree with whatever had been already said and put forth my view as well.

Summary: Even according to pakistan's ex-president Pervez Musharraf, the whole of J&K (PoK + J&K) is the root cause of all the friction between India and pakistan. India gains control over PoK and everybody goes back to getting on with their lives.
 

Plasma_Snake

Indidiot
But going for PoK means an all out war which we can't have right now so the only solution is going deceitfully, carrying out Sabotage and Surgical CT Ops in PoK, not even in proper Pak as any incident there can give Pak and its media unnecessary leverage. Even the Jew brothers are out with us on this. ;)
 
OP
pr.itdude

pr.itdude

tHe nEw gEEk......ITian
@ afonofa.....yar r u in some kind of security agency or journalism......??
itni details kaha se mili.........??
^^:p:D:p thoda zyada hogya...

jyada to hona hi tha.............jab baat pak aur india k aati hai to itne sare matters hai resolve karne k liye k 1 din lag jaye post karne me....!!!:p

but anyways, good to see such kind of vast cons n pros of this war kind issue......;)

In case of first use of nukes, Pak also knows that if they will use nukes
,,,, then definitely india too. In that case Pak will get more affected (infact almost destroyed) not India (a little bit as compard to Pak)........
So Pak will not gonna to think of nukes..........:!::!:

regarding, PoK....yes this would be the best tym when we can get our own kashmir back.........
just launch a military mission, no nukes, destroy all the camps of terrorists there and free the PoK from pakistan................
infact jo hamara hai use hum kyu na le....??
r v idiots....?:mad: v have donated a gr8 part of our India to the cruel ppls who r using it against us............!!!!
see the Kasmir, how beautiful it is.....!!
There should be nothing like PoK, its only to be Jammu & Kashmir of India.

And yes, there is an urge situation to make India strong from inside, the forces, intel must be so strong that these attacks must be prevented....!!
---------
 
Last edited:
The Pak's got nothing to lose and eveything to gain.They themselves dont know who's running their country.Secondly we ve to blame as much as on ourselves for the current fiasco.Wat were the damn intelligence agency doing why the hell are they even getting paid for.By the way did u read bout the MPs from CPI(M) dining in the restaurant when the attack took place.I'm sure who paid for their dinner.So much for their socialist agenda.The US called it our 9/11 .Compare their response to our response.The Jamaat Ud Dawa got banned.Hell they can change their name tomorrow and start working again.We are targeting the wrong area.Who's financing them......Not the ISI the dont ve enough money to pay themselves.Its the work for our intelligence agency's to find out and BTW attacking pakistan will get us into a quagmire.Jus look at North western frontier province of pakistan.Their own army cant quell the unrest.Well u can think wat'll happen to our army.Best to increase our readiness level to catch wat ever they throw at us
 

iNFiNiTE

The cake is a lie!!!
I don't understand how people take the issue of nukes so lightly, like how pak would be obliterated but India would be left with little or moderate amount of damage. The WMDs which we have today are many many times powerful than what were used in Hiroshima & Nagasaki. Even the detonation of a single nuke would result in millions of lost lives, not mention to property and future after effects. In the event of a nuclear war, there would be no political leadership left and god knows what will be the status of the armed forces. A scenario where a third country can easily exploit whatever is left of Indo-Pak.

Reading some of the posts, I'm suddenly thankful for the lack of political will in our leadership ( If the alternative is a group of hotshot politicians taking rash decisions leading to a nuclear war resulting in a national harakiri on an unimaginable scale.):rolleyes:

Anyways, I found two great articles. Read them completely and you will find yourself immensely informed and being able to think rationally:

‘Attacking Pakistan will not solve terrorism’
The second page of the article has some very good questions and answers.

'Let anger not turn into hate'
 
@Infinite........... dont u think the lack of political will is making us a sitting duck target.The answer is definitely not nukes but neither is war wat we need is to strengthen up our defences.Quotes from the 'The Hindu'.The last time a policeman practiced shootin was 15 years ago .Most of our policemen dont know to shoot straight.The ELITE ATS squad has never had shooting practice for the past year.CNN reported that the police officers jus did't know wat to do.The problems lie within us.Most of the NSG commandos are being utilized as personal security cordon of our political masters.Their specialization being hostage situations their skills are wasted protecting VIPS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom