Post your 3DMark Results in Here

[Rajesh345]

@ Rajesh345 - what gfx card do you have ?? It's just showing HD5700 series



eagle06 has nvidia carde - so that method wopn't work for him

@ eagle06 - use evga precision tweaker -0 it has option for changing clock/mem and fan speed - actually it's a OC tool for nvidia gfx cards and those scores at eXtreme level are really nice

XFX Radeon HD 5750
*img844.imageshack.us/img844/5880/gfxim.th.jpg

edit

PCMark
[default settings]
*img155.imageshack.us/img155/2252/pcmarku.jpg

still LF 3dmark, ANy1 know in which issue 3dmark was given

 

[topgear]

^^ got it buddy and listed it there

 

[Skud]

Here I go:-
CPU - E7400 @ STOCK
GPU - HD6950 1GB @ STOCK


3DMark06

*farm3.static.flickr.com/2356/5696278398_42f27655fa_b.jpg

Poor score. CPU pulled it back.


Vantage Extreme

*farm6.static.flickr.com/5230/5696278416_38bea4fe6d_b.jpg

No Score as the 19x12 resolution of extreme settings is not supported by my monitor.


Vantage High

*farm6.static.flickr.com/5146/5696278400_898a5edaec_b.jpg


Vantage Performance

*farm6.static.flickr.com/5065/5696278406_7234ce36f1_b.jpg

Vantage Performance

*farm6.static.flickr.com/5029/5696278404_b6eab6199b_b.jpg

I posted 2 results as for me it reflects something. Although the GPU score has decreased somewhat, with the increase of CPU score by 138 pt, Vantage score has increased 120 pt. This seems like a CPU limited benchmark.


3DMark11

*farm6.static.flickr.com/5263/5696278390_ece9e6dde1_b.jpg

Ah, finally, a score to write about. Its more in line 6950's result. Good to see it beating a 560Ti on a SNB 2500K! Some muscle there.


So here's the scoreboard:-

1. 3DMark06 - 13608
2. 3DMark Vantage - P10325, H9792
3. 3DMark11 - X1531

Scores with CPU OCed to 3.6GHz (28.5%):-

1. 3DMark06 - 16655 (22%)
2. 3DMark Vantage - P11977 (16%). H10001 (2.2%)
3. 3DMark11 - X1553 (1.5%)

 

[topgear]

^^ Nice scores - enlisted those.

 

[Skud]

OK screens for my scores with CPU OCed to 3.6GHz (GPU @ default):=

CPU-Z

*farm4.static.flickr.com/3324/5699745315_2e4dc171a6.jpg


3DMark06

*farm4.static.flickr.com/3607/5699745317_3248de2978_b.jpg


3DMark Vantage

*farm4.static.flickr.com/3619/5699745327_7275e30f5d_b.jpg


3DMark11

*farm4.static.flickr.com/3610/5699745331_69781b75a2_b.jpg

 

[nilgtx260]

guys my friend has i5 650 & Palit GTX 460 Sonic Platinum, when he runs vantage at 1980x1080 with all manually extreme settings (he doesnt have 1920x1200 so cant run default extreme setting), his scores come to GPU 14000+ CPU 37000+ which is astonishing for me? how does his i5 650 score 37000+ & GTX 460 score 14000+ when skud's HD 6950 scoring 7000+. I too have core 2 duo & also at 1080p manual extreme setting my cpu scores 6000+. So how does a noob i5 650 score 37000+ & also one my friend has i7 930 & XFX GT 240 1GB, when he runs vantage at same resolution with all manually extreme settings, his CPU scores 32000+ & GPU score only 1000+ which is again astonishing. Now my question is why skud's HD 6950 scores 7000+ where a noob GTX 460 socres 14000+ at 1080p manually extreme setting? why i5 650 scores 37000+ & i7 930 score 32000+ ?

 

[Skud]

From what I have gathered, both Vantage and 3DMark06 are hugely CPU dependent. Regarding your query about i5 scoring 37K and i7 scoring 32K, I think there's one setting in Vantage which toggle "Enable GPU Simulation" which influences CPU score. It may be the case with your friends where the 460 is propelling the i5 to 37k and the 240 is limiting the i7 to 32k. It may also happen that the no. of cores (real/virtual) coming into play.

 

[nilgtx260]

^^ what about ithehappy's pic then? he must have run vantage at 1080p with manually extreme setting but his cpu score comes 20K, why? GTX 560Ti seems like OK with 19K. why then i5 scores more than i7 950 (37K) Look at page 3

Imageshack - 34276356.jpg

 

[Skud]

i am clean bowled. no idea about it. let other members answer it.

But I have also noticed, 3DMark Vantage gives some erratic results time and again. Say I have OCed my CPU. CPU score has increased. You would expect GPU score to be increased or at least be the same within the range of error. Unexpectedly it has actually gone down the hill. That OCed result of mine is the best case scenario. I remember quite a few time I actually get a lower score compared to stock. I guess that PhysX thing may be the culprit. 3DMark11 is much as a better benchmark for GPU.

 

[nilgtx260]

^^ I have been bowled too man, that's why I want answer why a noob i5 650 score 37K without disabling PPU or GPU simulator (why should it be disabled) also why your HD 6950 scored 7000+ in 1080p extreme setting where GTX 560Ti score 19K in the same setting ? HD 6950 is faster than GTX 560Ti at stock speed.

 

[ithehappy]

Guys how to get this damn 3DMark 11 running and getting result? After all tests it continues to say 'Connecting to 3dMark.com failed' and blah blah...and ----- in place of scores ! Tried 10 times, same.

 

[topgear]

^^ I have been bowled too man, that's why I want answer why a noob i5 650 score 37K without disabling PPU or GPU simulator (why should it be disabled) also why your HD 6950 scored 7000+ in 1080p extreme setting where GTX 560Ti score 19K in the same setting ? HD 6950 is faster than GTX 560Ti at stock speed.

In 3DMark Vantage the default PhysyX and GPU enabled settings result in huge CPU scores with Nvidia graphics cards. So to get a unbiased CPU score score prior to run the CPU benchmark disable two settings from option namely :

1. DISABLE PPU ( This will disable PhysX )
2. DISABLE GPU SIMULATION ( This will disable gpu influence in CPU score )

 

[Skud]

Even after disabling those not much change is there in the scores.

PS: Driver settings are at default.

 

[ithehappy]

Guys how to get this damn 3DMark 11 running and getting result? After all tests it continues to say 'Connecting to 3dMark.com failed' and blah blah...and ----- in place of scores ! Tried 10 times, same.

Anyone? Please. Is there a download link of the Professional Edition? In their site only the Basic version is available.

 

[Rajesh345]

Anyone? Please. Is there a download link of the Professional Edition? In their site only the Basic version is available.

Professional Edition is not free , u need to pay to purchase Pro version


FOr normal uses Basic edition is enough


To purchase

*community.futuremark.com/store/

3D mark 11
Advanced Edition
$19.95 Add to cart

3Dmark09
Advanced Edition
$9.95 Add to cart


i suggest to stay with free versio0n since u r using for home use only

 

[ithehappy]

Thanks Rajesh for your reply. But is it possible to run benchmarks like above in Basic Edition? From the above pictures I can see you guys are using the Professional Edition.

 

[topgear]

Even after disabling those not much change is there in the scores.

PS: Driver settings are at default.

can I see some screenshot ? AND what version he is using ?

 

[Skud]

OK, results at stock and CPU at 3.6GHz. CPU score has increased 1200 points and GPU score has decreased 542 points.

 

[topgear]

^^ I wanted to see the screen shots of nilgtx260's friend's core i5 650 37k+ 3dmark vantage cpu score on post no. 117- that you and nilgtx260 were talking about - it's just too good to be true

BTW, On post No. 113 you have said here's ain't much difference in scores even after you have disabled PPU and GPU SIMULATION - well these two settings should be used with nvidia gfx cards but to keep all the benchmark settings equal I suggest everyone to disable these two settings - besides I've mentioned why this should be disabled ( In 3DMark Vantage the default PhysyX and GPU enabled settings result in huge CPU scores with Nvidia graphics cards ) - you have a AMD gfx card and that's why these two settings won't make any huge changes in you scores.

 

[ithehappy]

Here is mine, Performance Preset. both CPU and GPU at Stock clock, Nvidia Driver 270.61.

*img204.imageshack.us/img204/1384/3dmark11l.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Extreme Preset,

*img30.imageshack.us/img30/180/3dmx.jpg