Jaskanwar Singh
Aspiring Novelist
^BTW that cooler looks very nice too
Nice, any reason not to buy the 6950 TFIII Power edition?Guys just got myself a new beast the msi twin frozr ii hd 6950 2 gb gfx card got it from prime abgb today for 16000 will install it in my pc tomorrow i also got 3 cooler master fans two with led 1 without led will take pictures and post it once i have the beast installed on my comp... Cheers !!!!!!!!!!! :d
Guys just got myself a new beast the msi twin frozr ii hd 6950 2 gb gfx card got it from prime abgb today for 16000 will install it in my pc tomorrow i also got 3 cooler master fans two with led 1 without led will take pictures and post it once i have the beast installed on my comp... Cheers !!!!!!!!!!! :d
buddy asymmetric cfx performs very good in dx11 games. prob is with dx10/9 games. maybe amd will fix the issue.
and i am not going to replace that 35k config. we are just giving llano for reference.
the thing is - Asymmetric Crossfire
AnandTech - The AMD A8-3850 Review: Llano on the Desktop
very nice.
but no such ram model exists buddy.
Guys just got myself a new beast the msi twin frozr ii hd 6950 2 gb gfx card got it from prime abgb today for 16000 will install it in my pc tomorrow i also got 3 cooler master fans two with led 1 without led will take pictures and post it once i have the beast installed on my comp... Cheers !!!!!!!!!!! :d
got the model name from lynx but you're right there's no such model and I have made a mistake as well - it's not a 4GB single stick rather it's 2x 2GB sticks and I think this is the right model name for this 2000 Mhz Kit
G-Skill F3-16000CL9D-4GBTD (2Gx2)
For an AMD setup 1600Mhz will suffice because their CPUs are not strong enough to use all the bandwidth they have available.
In fact HT 3.1 has over twice the bandwidth vs QPI lol.
Oh that.
Obviously that is expected. GDDR5 is a much faster architecture than DDR3.
I thought you were referring to CPU performance
i think then that 1600mhz ram will suffice?
- sourceAcross our seven titles we found that on average DDR3-1600 resulted in a 12.6% increase in performance over DDR3-1333 at 1024 x 768. Moving up to higher resolutions only increased the advantage by under 2%. Using DDR3-1866 showed around a 20% increase in performance over DDR3-1333.
If we can suggest 2000 Mhz ram why stick with 1600 Mhz and read this :
- source
So why would we want to sacrifice 7.4% performance just for 500 bucks but if you are sure that G.Skill Ripjaws F3-12800CL9S-4GBRL can run at 1866 Mhz feel free to suggest it for Liano rigs