Come to think of it, if one looks at an informed buyer making a rationale choice then the decision will never be just driven by whether I get a touch screen or a different looking phone or extra couple of pixels.
I guess, it’s about how feature rich the phone is, the performance, storage, whether it serves my purpose, price vs. features and to some extent the looks.
The n96 has always been compared with iphone – god knows for what and some of the other similar phones available in this range.
Considering that most of these options are at par with the major difference being form factor, I don’t seem to understand the logic behind “getting into n96 design bashing” all the time without any logical argument on features etc.
Can anyone run down the complete list of features if any one really knows for N96? (Please do not copy paste from specifications available on the net)
The attempt is not to misguide consumers.
Do I hear something?
P.S. Looking for a healthy debate
I guess, it’s about how feature rich the phone is, the performance, storage, whether it serves my purpose, price vs. features and to some extent the looks.
The n96 has always been compared with iphone – god knows for what and some of the other similar phones available in this range.
Considering that most of these options are at par with the major difference being form factor, I don’t seem to understand the logic behind “getting into n96 design bashing” all the time without any logical argument on features etc.
Can anyone run down the complete list of features if any one really knows for N96? (Please do not copy paste from specifications available on the net)
The attempt is not to misguide consumers.
Do I hear something?
P.S. Looking for a healthy debate