I sometimes feel people just buy a mouse according to the budget they have. I haven't come across a review of all the mice which says for eg: why the GS500 is miles ahead of the MX518
My choice of imperator was coupled with lack of awareness (apart from GS500) and the design of imperator which I loved and really impressed me, I knew nothing about its specs. Having said that I can't say its better than the MX518 I used a long time ago in a gaming cafe (he told me not to tell anyone that there's a 518 in house
)
And imperator sells for twice as much as the MX518. So all this recommendation for DA, GS500, Naga etc confuses me. Is it comparatively better or is it a personal sole experience, I wonder.
I think it is more important that you get the fit right. The imperator is an excellent mouse for a palm grip. Unfortunately I use finger grip to hold my mouse. This is an expensive realisation. I would like you all to realise it before the purchase and not be in my state. (I love the Imperator though
)
I was told in the forum by someone else that most mice come in the (body fit type) countoured packaging. That way you can get your fit right.
For a gaming mouse I would say:
~
The DPI is a useless number. The minimum found in the entry level gaming mouse is what you will be using in any mouse be it the GS500 or the naga i.e. around 1800DPI +/-400
~
Get the fit right (should be about 90% of buying criteria)
~
More money = More buttons (as simple as that) Pay for them only if you need them. The most notable features of the buttons on the mice are "on the fly DPI adjustment" - useful in FPS games and few Macro buttons (depends on the user completely)
~ Look for warranty. Its a gaming mouse. You will never abuse something so much in your life as you will do a gaming mouse. So see to it that it survives a gamers usage cycle.