gxsaurav
You gave been GXified
And you can buy a license to use the patented thing.eddie said:That is the problem with you. You don't know anything about FOSS licenses but want to project yourself as an omniscient one. FFDShow breaks numerous software patents and it CANNOT BE INCLUDED! It cannot be. Simple! It is not about money...it is about patents.
Just tell me one thing. How many users out there use Ogg, how many use mp3 & how many use AAC.Yes I can't play my audio & video files in Windows. All of them are in OGG and Theora format. Can I play them in Windows out-of-the-box? If I can then I will accept your comments about codecs. Now, what should a user like me do? Download codecs? But you said it worked out of the box? It is funny that Windows users want Linux to support closed formats while Windows doesn't support completely open formats
1) If you are using mp3, it plays
2) If you are using AAC, chances are u r using iPod & iTunes so it plays
3) If you are using OGG, which is not a very popular format out there resulting in low acceptance then you also know how to search on google for FFDShow for Windows.
Oh, so Trillian didn't paid Yahoo any fees, WOW, then how does Yahoo webcam & voice chat works in it . Hey, I am an average Joe, it works...gr8. Who cares for licensing fees etc.Trillian paid Yahoo! some fees? My google search brings NOTHING. Can you prove it or is it another one of your lies?
*www.google.co.in/search?q=trillian+paid+yahoo
All I am saying is that if trilian can support it in Trillian free then so can GAIM.
So, does graphics card driver constitutes 95% of the software market out thre? Guess what, XPDM works fine in Vista too...but Linux kernel 2.0 drive doesn't work in Linux kernel 2.6Are you the same user who was aggressively defending Graphics drivers for Windows vista being "work in progress"?
Are you confusing me with Arya?Talks the guy who uses an OS that couldn't even get copy-paste working properly.
HA HA HAHAAHHAAHAHAA, Dude this is 2007 & you are saying developers don't find it important enough to provide visual communication function in Pidgin...r u high on pot today.?That developers don't have time to include it in their tree. As simple as that.
i advice you to read that article again & try to find out how easy/tough it is to make XAML apps compared to Glade. would be an eye opener for you. If GNOME is using it, then why don't I see it in current GNOME version?Anyways, here is one article from 2004...just to prove that vector graphics is being used for UI development in GNOME for that many years
*times.usefulinc.com/2004/03/03-gnomeui
Something which i would like to Quote from the article u gave.
XUL is the user interface language used in the Mozilla project. There are other implementations, but Mozilla is the only realistic game in town. XUL was around doing what XAML does before XAML ever existed. So why the heck aren't we using it? Problems include
- XUL has a steep learning curve. Docs have been slow to come, especially at the beginning.
- Dealing with Mozilla is painful. Very painful. Experience with embedding Mozilla in programs like Epiphany shows it to be a moving target, and it's difficult to get bugs fixed back in the core. Up until now the Mozilla project had very little resource devoted to embedding uses.
- Mozilla XUL is not native UI. This is the big stinker with cross platform UI. It just won't look as nice or interoperate as well as programs written in the native UI toolkit.
OMG.. What the hell....how can it be tough,. it doesn't work properly & is hard to make apps in it. Damn you MS for releasing XAML & WPF which makes it really simple for developers to make UI.
This is more of a grab-bag solution for now. Various projects have used and are using HTML for rapid UI development. The Evolution mail reader is the most prominent among these. SVG is starting to be deployed well on the GNOME desktop.
These solutions have the big problem however that they totally miss the native look and feel. Microsoft themselves went down the HTML-as-UI route and I think proved its difficulties. Neither do the current HTML and SVG libraries have any scripting support. So we're really just limited to document-like display. Also, all of the GtkHTML libraries are rather crusty, especially compared to things like Mozilla.
I believe the GNOME project and the open source desktop community at large can make a response to Microsoft. But we need to recognise a key economic constraint for would-be adopters. This constraint is developer time. Microsoft licensing and support is cheap compared to the time spent in creating applications. To get the cost of Linux desktop deployment down, we need to drive down the cost of application development.
Last edited: