Learn photography with me
OP
nac
Aspiring Novelist
Sujoy, Nicely enhanced. As Gen said, noise is visible even in this small size.
I was free last week (most of the time). Was out for shooting. I tried double exposure, and it has come out good (in my view). Though the person in the portrait wouldn't let me post the photograph online. So I will work one something for the last exercise.
Thought I will be free this week too, but fortunately/unfortunately my friend's friend lend his modem. And now I am back to work...
I was free last week (most of the time). Was out for shooting. I tried double exposure, and it has come out good (in my view). Though the person in the portrait wouldn't let me post the photograph online. So I will work one something for the last exercise.
Thought I will be free this week too, but fortunately/unfortunately my friend's friend lend his modem. And now I am back to work...
OP
nac
Aspiring Novelist
Wanted to do some kinda trick photography, but end up with manipulating the images. May be I will do that after completing the next part of the book
*imageshack.com/a/img547/9633/1pca.jpg
It's a composite two images (bird and sky is one photograph, land and hills is the other one) and few layers created in PS.
Tutorial Reference:
Thunderbolt layer - How to create a thunder with Photoshop | Drawing | Adobe Photoshop | Programs | Dreevoo.com
Rain effect - Adding Rain To A Photo With Photoshop
Tried to create clouds, but it didn't come out good.
*imageshack.com/a/img547/9633/1pca.jpg
It's a composite two images (bird and sky is one photograph, land and hills is the other one) and few layers created in PS.
Tutorial Reference:
Thunderbolt layer - How to create a thunder with Photoshop | Drawing | Adobe Photoshop | Programs | Dreevoo.com
Rain effect - Adding Rain To A Photo With Photoshop
Tried to create clouds, but it didn't come out good.
izzikio_rage
Technomancer
Still pretty good effects ... Would've been more well suited to a good night time image though. Your brain does subconsciously figure out that the light on the horizon would have hidden any stars, plus if the sky is that dark the landscape cannot show so many colors. It's something we are used to seeing and if it's different then we feel its fake
awesome try though ... will need to give these a shot
BTW check this out 500px / *** by Evgeny Vasenev it's post processed, that I'm sure, but really well done
awesome try though ... will need to give these a shot
BTW check this out 500px / *** by Evgeny Vasenev it's post processed, that I'm sure, but really well done
sujoyp
Grand Master
no amlan its not post processed...its very real...let me give you a photostream of one of good photographer I personally know
Flickr: Manish Mamtani's Photostream
This guy takes awesome photographs...he lives in US and is a SAP consultant at accenture ...he is from nagpur ...
All the pics are really taken by him with just as much PP done as we do..
and my target is this -> *www.flickr.com/photos/24421425@N04/
this one is taken by one of my friend living in kanpur ....he is more of a mentor then a friend actually a government employee
Flickr: Manish Mamtani's Photostream
This guy takes awesome photographs...he lives in US and is a SAP consultant at accenture ...he is from nagpur ...
All the pics are really taken by him with just as much PP done as we do..
and my target is this -> *www.flickr.com/photos/24421425@N04/
this one is taken by one of my friend living in kanpur ....he is more of a mentor then a friend actually
a government employee
OP
nac
Aspiring Novelist
They are birds, not stars...
he he he taare zameen par....
And both your friends works are fantabulous...
What the photographer achieved of the sky/stars are pretty much possible straight out the camera...
This is my favourite video of astro photography... I am sure I have posted this quite a few times, and I am again posting it (If you haven't seen it before, you can check out this video)
kaz
right here
izzikio_rage
Technomancer
Sorry, I think I posted in the wrong thread. Loved the pics from your mentors/friends sujoy ... no wonder you are so good at this
sujoyp
Grand Master
That's why you got a D7000same gears... hmmmmmm
Yes I may just get his whole gears copy to copy
may replace 150-500 with a 300f4+1.4x TC ...he got some great results out of it @amlan those days I had just started and we used to go shooting every weekend...I used to ask a million questions...it is the best way of learning...learn on field
OP
nac
Aspiring Novelist
Usually, compact cameras are marketed in that fashion (50x zoom, 10x zoom and all). It's just that telephoto divided by wide angle, in this 300/70 which is 4.xx times zoom. Simply 4x zoom. 25-100mm is also 4x zoom, but that doesn't mean this will zoom as close as 70-300.
Ex: From 6m distance with your camera, you can shoot full length portrait @70mm and shoot head/shoulder @300mm. With the kit lens, from the same distance you can shoot group photo of 15/20 people @18mm.
Sujoy have explained this to many newbies. It would be good if Sujoy put that post's links in his signature.
Ex: From 6m distance with your camera, you can shoot full length portrait @70mm and shoot head/shoulder @300mm. With the kit lens, from the same distance you can shoot group photo of 15/20 people @18mm.
Sujoy have explained this to many newbies. It would be good if Sujoy put that post's links in his signature.
Hrishi
******************
let me search the post I have written
this one I explained some day ago
Thanks for the information.
Can you share a pic taken at 50mm and then the same pic at 300mm ??? I just want to have a rough estimate of zoom levels .