i would suggest you to buy pirated os and go for sapphire r9 270x for 16000
even in this case you can go for pirated os and buy sapphire r9 270x
marvelousprashant
Cyborg Agent
Slight modification to this rig
Add 2240L and R9270x. Buy any local cabinet for 800-1000.
Total 47100
Spend ~3k extra or Download Windows 8 trial and buy next month
why not buy windows for 499/- here Windows 8 Pro (32 & 64 Bit)
do you think r9 270x can handle games at 1080p.....?
do you think r9 270x can handle games at 1080p.....?
with his budget he cannot buy a 1080p monitor as he does not have enough cash to buy a decent graphics card
For a 1080p monitor you need atleast a r9 280x or higher card to play games at high details and enjoy the resolution
For a 1080p monitor you need atleast a r9 280x or higher card to play games at high details and enjoy the resolution
how can you say ?^Shopclue is itself pirate site. Never buy pc products from it
give proof^
i need proof
marvelousprashant
Cyborg Agent
Crysis 3 (high) 46 fps
BF3 (ultra high) 55fps
Hitman Absolution (Ultra) 63 fps
Farcry 3 (ultra) 23
Source: Anandtech and other reviews
ASHISH65
Technomancer
Regarding Shopclues
Just think "Can anyone sell W8 pro for rs 500 which costs 12k" ? off,course not That's FAKE
SEE - *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/others-technology/178651-shopclues-com.html
Even my friend had a experience with shop clues and later he was cheated
Stay away from Shopclues.
Just think "Can anyone sell W8 pro for rs 500 which costs 12k" ? off,course not That's FAKESEE - *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/others-technology/178651-shopclues-com.html
Even my friend had a experience with shop clues and later he was cheated
Stay away from Shopclues.
thank you for these proofs. yes now it can be said that r9 270x is the right card for you
ok op buy this
Intel i3 4130 / fx 6300 8000 / 7500
gigabyte b85m d3h / gigabyte 970a ds3 6100 / 5600
Kingston HyperX Blu 4gb 2400
Western Digital Caviar Blue 1Tb 4000
sapphire r9 270x 15500
Corsair Cx500 or any other psu 4000
nzxt gamma 2200
Asus 24x DVD Writer 1100
Dell st 2240 L 8900
Windows 8 basic 5800
TOTAL 58000 / 57000
Cilus
laborare est orare
Dude, do not go for an AMD processor, even a second gen i3 can beat up fx series processors real good in games. Though in productivity fx are faster but only by a little bit. Better you off with 4th gen i3 or i5, you will not regret.
AMD is good only in one aspect, they are power hungry and hot running cpus, so you can enjoy a barbeque or egg frying sort of arrangement, and since winter has already arrived, it will serve you good, trust me.
For RAM, go with 8gb ram since it's Battlefield season. Will serve you in future games too. Go with any value ram like corsair value ram 1333mhz since you are not going to OC, and ram speed doesn't do much good in games (only 1-2%).
Also, as everyone is talking about oc, and since the op himself doesn't wants to do it (will be out of budget for a good mobo, good cooler and an efficient psu), I think better go with a good cpu so oc nvr becomes a hinderance. Don't suggest him about oc'ing considering that it will not benefit much for an extra penny spent. Cut the extra budget needed from mobo and utilize it for cpu; for better off with amd newer cards, the R series, offers value for money plus are loaded with features like mantle.
Are you talking about the games, released in 2012-2013 or before that? If the later is true, you should concentrate reading of CPU scaling in new games like Crysis 3, Hitman Absolution, Tomb Raider 2012, BF4, Medal of honor, Company of heros etc rather than suggesting misleading info. And what productivity suit you have worked on where FX is just slightly faster, Itune's Music conversion app?
bssunilreddy
Chosen of the Omnissiah
If Microsoft have country wise plans for selling their software 90% of Indians would go for Genuine OS or softwares. They sell for $50 elsewhere but sell for $150 here. How come anybody wants to buy such overpriced softwares buddy.
We PC gamers asked for AMD FX 6300 and GTA 5 to be released in India as soon as possible and made an online collection of requests getting signature in droves but it is not happening in the case of Windows 7 OS in particular. I simply don't like Windows 8.
AshutoshM
Blue Age Wonders
Have a look, and I'm not misleading anyone:
AnandTech | Bench - CPU
for games, fx just tends to get close to i3s...and its not about when the games were released, for single threading, i3 is surely faster but those games taking advantage of multi threads, fx are faster I must say, an in some i3 but the difference is not tht huge to be significant. If you look at fx 8320, it definitely compares with i5s but here, the difference is too high than fx 6300 and i3s. So, if for one core comparison, i3s are faster, and the two cores are competing against 6 or 8 cores, does this looks reasonable by any means. Man, AMD are long way behind Intel.
I suggest op to go with i5 3450/70 @11-11.5k and any h61 mobo for under 4k. (Thanks ASHISH65 for the prices
)
Last edited:
Cilus
laborare est orare
Buddy, the link you have given, apart from sysmark benchmark, which is not officially supproted by any other Vendors apart from Intel due to their extreme Biasness towards Intell design, in all the other productivity related suits, FX-6300 is way ahead of i3 3220 and available at the same price point. And regarding single threaded performance, it is just little behind i3 whereas in Multithreaded performance, it is far ahead of it. In Cinebench 11.5 64 bit single threaded performance, i3's score is 1.37 and for 6300, it is 1.07 but in multithreaded, for 6300, it is 4.5 and for i3, it is 3.29. FX-6300 is more than 1.1 point ahead of i3 and you are saying it is not significant. DO you have any idea what those scores actually mean or imply?
In X264 Benchmark, in 2nd pass, a FX-6300 can process 29 frames/sec whereas i3 can only process 17.5 Frames/sec and you are saying it is very marginal difference. Try to read about those software suits and understand what those benchmarks actually do rather than saying "In my Opinion, it is marginal"
Now, all the new games which have been released in last 2 years are more or less multithreaded. In games like Tomb Raider, Crysis 3, even a FX-4300 can beat the hell out of i3 and by a huge margin. And believe me, 95% of the upcoming games are gonna be pretty much multi -threading optimized to use as many cores as possible.
In X264 Benchmark, in 2nd pass, a FX-6300 can process 29 frames/sec whereas i3 can only process 17.5 Frames/sec and you are saying it is very marginal difference. Try to read about those software suits and understand what those benchmarks actually do rather than saying "In my Opinion, it is marginal"
Now, I got it, you are here to prove your point, not helping OP. Then suggest an Intel config at OP's budget which will perform better than a FX-6300 in gaming and other tasks. DOn't forget that, at the same price point, AMD is giving you 6 cores, they aren't asking for more money.
Now, all the new games which have been released in last 2 years are more or less multithreaded. In games like Tomb Raider, Crysis 3, even a FX-4300 can beat the hell out of i3 and by a huge margin. And believe me, 95% of the upcoming games are gonna be pretty much multi -threading optimized to use as many cores as possible.
AshutoshM
Blue Age Wonders
+1
Point!
I still have one doubt, the more cores, the better? Now, eliminate those factors such as a very deep generation gap.