Gaming pc 50k...

i72600k

The Physicist!
That is a very bad advise. A good motherboard isn't just for multi-gpu setup. Its the motherboard that decides how much you can overclock, which features will you have. A poor motherboard with Chinese caps will be very susceptible any voltage alteration and the VRM will be bad. A good motherboard is always recommended irrespective of GPU setup.
The guy who started this thread is not planning to overclock, so heating is not an issue for him. As far as ASUS brand is concerned, it doesn't matter whether you buy their flagship product or the cheapest ones around, they are all going to be reliable. My earlier PC served me well for 7 years with a very cheap motherboard until I upgraded.
 

ASHISH65

Technomancer
It is useful for an upgrade not for bench see what tom wrote -
Indeed, this hierarchy chart is useful as a general guideline, but certainly not as a one-size-fits-all CPU comparison resource
 

rijinpk1

Aspiring Novelist
Gaming CPU Hierarchy Chart - Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: October 2013
here i3 3220 beats fx6300

you did not see the links posted by Ashish. it is important note that games like crysis 3, bf3,bf4 etc uses multithreads efficiently where i3 cant keep up with fx 6300. for old games, i3 may be faster. new gmaes make use of multi thread very efficiently where 2 cores of i3 cant do much.
 

gagan_kumar

Wise Old Owl
*static.techspot.com/articles-info/642/bench/CPU_03.png

*static.techspot.com/articles-info/645/bench/CPU_03.png

*static.techspot.com/articles-info/670/bench/CPU_01.png

where is the 4th gen intel processors in that benchmarks........

@op if u want more cores and more threads go with amd as simple as that..........
 

gamerbloke

Broken In
New one coming to this Debates is KAVERI APU based on STEAMROLLER...... but u have to wait till Jan14!!
AFAIK b/w i3 nd 6300 u should go with 6300 for new releasing games, who cares about the old ones when newer have everything to offer otherwise i5 is BAAP of all :p

Buddy, the link you have given, apart from sysmark benchmark, which is not officially supproted by any other Vendors apart from Intel due to their extreme Biasness towards Intell design, in all the other productivity related suits, FX-6300 is way ahead of i3 3220 and available at the same price point. And regarding single threaded performance, it is just little behind i3 whereas in Multithreaded performance, it is far ahead of it. In Cinebench 11.5 64 bit single threaded performance, i3's score is 1.37 and for 6300, it is 1.07 but in multithreaded, for 6300, it is 4.5 and for i3, it is 3.29. FX-6300 is more than 1.1 point ahead of i3 and you are saying it is not significant. DO you have any idea what those scores actually mean or imply?
In X264 Benchmark, in 2nd pass, a FX-6300 can process 29 frames/sec whereas i3 can only process 17.5 Frames/sec and you are saying it is very marginal difference. Try to read about those software suits and understand what those benchmarks actually do rather than saying "In my Opinion, it is marginal"


Now, I got it, you are here to prove your point, not helping OP. Then suggest an Intel config at OP's budget which will perform better than a FX-6300 in gaming and other tasks. DOn't forget that, at the same price point, AMD is giving you 6 cores, they aren't asking for more money.

Now, all the new games which have been released in last 2 years are more or less multithreaded. In games like Tomb Raider, Crysis 3, even a FX-4300 can beat the hell out of i3 and by a huge margin. And believe me, 95% of the upcoming games are gonna be pretty much multi -threading optimized to use as many cores as possible.

lol.... right on the face!! gud info BTW
+1

That still doesn't justify piracy.

That surely justifies piracy.... country wise plans are indeed required keeping country's currency value internationally in mind!!
 
OP
N@m@n

N@m@n

Journeyman
ok guys i went to nehru place got the following quote:
fx 6300 7600
msi 970a g43 5500
kingston hyperx blu 4gb 2400
wd 1tb blue 4000
xfx / sapphire hd 7770 8000
antec x1 2300
antec vp 450p 2800
asus dvd writer 1000
dell in2030m 6400
windows 8 basic 5800
apc 800va ups 4200
TOTAL 50000
As i cannot spend more than 50k
Please tell how did u like it?
 

ASHISH65

Technomancer
is ups really need now ? Because you can get gtx 650ti boost in your budget after cutdown of ups.


your need better gpu bro,hd 7770 will not cut for 900p
 
OP
N@m@n

N@m@n

Journeyman
hmm okay. so if i add 5800 to 8000 it becomes 13800 so which graphic card should i buy for 13800?
 

ASHISH65

Technomancer
Gtx 650ti boost @12500

this will max most games easily at 900p :wink:

If you still left with 1k then get a better psu like seasonic s12 520w @ 4000

Because this can help if you plan to upgrade powerful gpu later
 
OP
N@m@n

N@m@n

Journeyman
now i was reading Conclusion: Performance Per Dollar - Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: November 2013
so dont you think amd Athlon X4 750K should be bought over fx 6300?
 
OP
N@m@n

N@m@n

Journeyman
ok then final build
fx6300 7600
msi 970a g43 5500
kinston 4gb ram 2400
wd blue 1tb 4000
gtx 650 ti boost 12800
asus dvd wr 1000
seasonic s12 520w 4000
antec x1 2400
dell in2030m 6400
apc 800va 4200
Total 50000
 

rijinpk1

Aspiring Novelist
ok then final build
fx6300 7600
msi 970a g43 5500
kinston 4gb ram 2400
wd blue 1tb 4000
gtx 650 ti boost 12800
asus dvd wr 1000
seasonic s12 520w 4000
antec x1 2400
dell in2030m 6400
apc 800va 4200
Total 50000

get gigabyte ga-970a ds3 instead of msi
also look for a better case with good cable management like antec gx700, betfenix merc alpha etc,
 
Top Bottom