EU fines Microsoft record $1.35 billion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cyrus_the_virus

Unmountable Boot Volume
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission fined Microsoft a record 899 million euros ($1.35 billion) on Wednesday for defying sanctions imposed on the software giant for antitrust violations, far exceeding the original penalty.

The Commission, executive arm of the European Union, has now fined Microsoft 1.68 billion euros for its original violation and for failing to comply with sanctions, more than any other firm. It said no other company had ever ignored sanctions.

"Microsoft was the first company in 50 years of EU competition policy that the Commission has had to fine for failure to comply with an antitrust decision," Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement.

The company said in a statement that the fines concerned "past issues" and it was now looking to the future.

The Commission said in a landmark 2004 ruling -- upheld by an EU court last year -- that Microsoft had withheld needed interoperability information to rival makers of "work group server" software.

The software, which operates printers and sign-ons for small office groups, must interoperate with desktop Windows machines. The Commission found Microsoft denied vital interoperability codes to rivals, whose market share then shriveled, to be replaced by Microsoft's own product.

Microsoft was ordered to provide the information. It agreed to do so but imposed high royalties on grounds of innovation.

The Commission found instead that the information lacked much innovation and was more like a lock to which Microsoft was withholding the combination. It decided the royalties were unreasonable.
"I hope that today's decision closes a dark chapter in Microsoft's record of non-compliance with the Commission's March 2004 decision," Kroes said.

After fining Microsoft 497 million euros in 2004, the Commission fined the company another 280.5 million euros in July 2006 for failing to comply with the sanctions.

The latest decision picks up from where that fine left off, for the period from June 21, 2006 until October 21, 2007. After that, Microsoft agreed to reduced royalties and to provide needed information.

"As we demonstrated last week with our new interoperability principles and specific actions to increase the openness of our products, we are focusing on steps that will improve things for the future," the Microsoft statement said.

Last week, knowing a large fine was imminent for its failure to provide interoperability information, the company publicly promised to publish critical information so rival programs worked better with Windows.

The Commission took a wait-and-see attitude. It said Microsoft had several times made similar promises, only to have no real effect.

Microsoft still faces other potential action by the Commission.

In January, the EU executive started two new formal antitrust investigations against Microsoft -- one relating to interoperability, and one relating to the tying of separate software products.

Source: Reuters
(Reporting by David Lawsky; Editing by Dale Hudson)
 

din

Tribal Boy
Good, hope they start thinking on - Ethical Business - at least in the future ..
 

casanova

The Frozen Nova
Reading all this charges EU puts on MS, I feel that EU runs on the fines paid by MS. Something like MS (R) EU (R)
 
thats what you get for trying to abuse monopoly.
we never see intel getting fined like this. Instead, they get appritiated.
Thats because intel opens up unlike microsoft.
 

infra_red_dude

Wire muncher!
Intel not getting fined? Intel is a big bad company, Metalhead!!! And where did they "open" things up?

Btw, I thot defaulting fines was prevalent only in our country. Never knew it was a norm in EU too! :D
 

din

Tribal Boy
if im not wrong it was this very forum where the news of amd filing a suit against intel in india was posted :rolleyes:

I think you meant this ?

AMD sees Intel bias in tenders, to move Competition Commission of India

But that was against bias in tenders and was not directly against Intel (but against Govt Tender Process) ?
 

iMav

The Devil's Advocate
I think you meant this ?

AMD sees Intel bias in tenders, to move Competition Commission of India

But that was against bias in tenders and was not directly against Intel (but against Govt Tender Process) ?
yes & intel has been complained against by amd on numerous occasions fro stocking up retailers/distributors with their stuff and blah blah ;)
 
OP
Cyrus_the_virus

Cyrus_the_virus

Unmountable Boot Volume
I think you meant this ?

AMD sees Intel bias in tenders, to move Competition Commission of India

But that was against bias in tenders and was not directly against Intel (but against Govt Tender Process) ?

I guess he also meant this:

EU raids Intel's Munich offices, also targets retailers

The EU's antitrust investigation against Intel took another step forward today as European Commission (EC) officials conducted surprise raids on the company's Munich offices. The EU, however, didn't stop there; German electronics retailer Media Markt-Saturn was also raided, as was British retailer DSG International Plc. Intel is currently preparing hearing next month in Brussels on the allegation that it abused its dominant position in the market in ways that illegally harmed its competitor, AMD.

"Commission officials carried out unannounced inspections at the premises of a manufacturer of central processing units and a number of personal computer retailers," a Commission spokesperson said in a statement.

Intel acknowledged that a raid did take place, as did the two other companies in question, but there's no information as of yet on what material was or was not taken. This isn't the first time that Media Markt-Saturn has been directly involved in an Intel antitrust action—the company's close relationship with Intel is already under investigation. Like the Dell of long ago early 2006, Media Markt-Saturn currently sells no AMD-based equipment. This, in and of itself, is not a crime—but AMD's allegations paint Media Markt-Saturn as the recipient of any number of sweetheart deals and/or incentive packages in exchange for exclusively carrying Intel products.

The raids are just another reminder (if Intel needed it) of just how willing the EU is to play hardball when it comes to international antitrust investigations. Thus far, Intel's public response to the EU's allegations have been limited, though the company does maintain that any and all of its actions were "lawful, procompetitive, and beneficial to consumers." AMD, of course, would characterize Intel's behavior over the past eight years or so quite differently.

The EC's decision won't directly impact AMD's antitrust complaint against Intel in the United States, but it could become the third entity (after South Korea and Japan) to find evidence of anticompetitive behavior on the part of the Santa Clara chipmaker. Such findings would have no direct legal impact on AMD's US-based case against Intel, but could bolster AMD's fortunes down the road.

Source
 

din

Tribal Boy
Yes, Monopoly and un-ethical business practices sux, let it be software or hardware.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom