@Rhitwick -
I'm glad you are again quoting me directly unlike the admin of this forum who comments from the corner and behind the walls like Amul Baby, with a troll record of 24x7 over 365 days.
rhitwick said:
You've intelligently avoided the question I raised. Do you support what the "one gujrati" innocently told me?
I'm against it. I'm against killing of muslims just because they are tagged as muslims. But I'm against the doctrines of Quran as well!
I hope that makes it clear. I'm only against the doctrines of abrahamic religions. Seldom you'd find me saying any word against Buddhism, Jainism, Hinduism, COnfuicianism, Taoism, Rhitwickism ---- But I'm against state of reduction of these sciences tagged with an "ism" i.e their ism-ness. I'm against any doctrine that divides between us and them, promotes something sordid as 72 virgins in harems and judgement day. I'm against blind belief and attachment to science and Veda for attachment creates delusions and inability to question the subject of attachment.
Should I post verses from Veda against such attachment, and Gita where it forbids attachment to even Veda?
rhitwick said:
Why not take reference of a muslim site where the story is told from the other side too.
You really think I haven't seen them all? The logic from a mindset that resembles the likes of Zakir Naik flooding those sites? Perhaps, you can give me a logic on why to kill an animal and not your own parents "to distribute food etc".
@Snap, rightly pointed out that it will become Veg Vs Non-Veg debate. I can flood with logic, facts, modern researches and certificate and testimonials of the "modern scientists" you often seek!
rhitwick said:
@Mediator, b/w about your post on Bakra-id, that link is of a blog where the poster is definitely a hater of Islamic religion.
Another instance where you without reading the substance ended it by tagging the blog poster. Should I dismiss Quran by tagging it as kafir, jews, christian etc hater? Learn to read without tagging!
Please post at what all places the blog poster hated the "Islamic religion"? So if millions of goats will be killed on one particular day for some "XYZ reasons" Rhitwick will come and justify or ignore, but when someone will protest it out of kindness for animals and their pain, the same Rhitwick will call him "hater of Islamic religion"?
rhitwick said:
And, if you point to them slaughtering cows/camels/goats they too can point to many rituals of ours where we slaughter goats to please certain Gods.
I'm stricly against it, such ignorance of the priests! But seems you are again not trying to find the truth of the matter yourself but stuck to what I or they have to say! Here is homework you need to do. Read as many version of Quran as possible and then provide me verses for the ones I post which would say anything different. T
You seem to have a soft heart for Islam, whereby you connive, ignore or justify it on the top of distorting or giving false practices under the banner of "Hinduism" as truth, a general approach of modern secularists who insult and criticize the science of their own motherland without even understanding it and promote the acts of invaders, ignore their evil practices and if someone question them up, shut him down by simply tagging him as "anti-.....","communal" etc?
I really don't care what people think of such practices like I said. There are two things
1. Act of people
2. What the scriptures teach
In case of Islam, teachings of the book synchronize with the act of people i.e terrorism in the name of Allah, demand for Sharia wherever muslims start getting in numbers (France, US, UK, India....what not?), demand for a separate law, killing of kafirs, jews and christians, 72 virgins in harem, judgment day, division of the society between us and them (believers and non-believers) etc goes by the teaching of Quran. If you have any other story for these doctrines do bring them forward after deeply understanding them for you might face my questions afterwards. Yes, I have debated for long without any success to the benefit of doubt I had reserved.
Like I stated and have been doing this since time immemorial, the basic foundation of science of consciousness is detachment from your own and borrowed beliefs and questioning extensively and instensively the very science you pursue. It is poles apart and contrary to a mindset which says "My religion is the best".
"La Ilaha Il Alaha Mohammed ur rasool Allah" promotes attachment to a name and a doctrine of his prophet. Like I asked, can you really question the life of Mohammed and question Allah?
rhitwick said:
Again none of us are innocent dude, none. If you look closely we both are standing at same level.
I'm not bothered about a ego clash, level or a standing, but simple sharing of information that we call as discussion. Please learn to take humour and light hearted comments without analyzing it too much.
Anyways, we were on a BJP Vs Congress or Modi or Not or "Indian economy goin down debate"
hadn't it been your story over "I met a gujarati". You may continue from my post #87 and #89.
PS - The above bold is a light hearted statement. This has been notified so that you don't analyze and give lectures on a stand, innocence, levels etc.