;lol: see what i mean the lack of common sense of a person is attributed to as the fault of the OSrayraven said:Lolz.As if spending money for xp isnt enuf.
Now i gotta buy a software to be able to change themes too.
Thats one thing i totally hate about Xp and Vista.
I gotta buy softwares to change a theme too.
In case of Vista, the screen goes black & u see a cursor, the graphics subsystem restarts.
I just wanted to understand why the AERO experience in Windows cannot do the graphical sizzlers on 915 based cards while beryl can, and that too with great smoothness.
Why is it not possible to enable only the eye candy functionality that is available on the users hardware
If the thing is possible for beryl to give effects on presentation layer of OS, what are the technological differences that caused Microsoft to not keep this layer seperate from other great things present in AERO.
gx_saurav said:It is possible, like I said before, everything u see in Aero can be achieved in DX 8.1 but the overhead & code will be quite complex. If it wasen't for MS u would still be having 6 years old technology in your onboard GPU. MS just raised the bar for onboard GFX to give better out of the box features for DX 9c & 10 along with hardware acceleration of Videos & what not using the GPU & DirectShow.
LOL! I never _forget_ to understand! Heh.. Maybe you have that problem, not me! What i fail to undestand is the how can the monitor display a cursor when it aint even connected to a graphics card!gx_saurav said:I guess u forgot to understand the real meaning. When the graphics driver changes or needs to be reset, all u see is a black screen & a cursor on it, like dos prompt.
Isnt that why we have graphics cards? If everything were done on CPU, why does AERO need such high end graphics cards?gx_saurav said:Aero is not just about Smooth UI, its about much more which I have already mentioned. Beryl doesn't do half the things aero can do, its just uses a GPU to calculate the Windows instead of CPU.
In other words complexity is too much for DX 8.1 to handle.. Which means it _cant_ be achieved in DX 8.1. So please dont twist the truth.gx_saurav said:It is possible, like I said before, everything u see in Aero can be achieved in DX 8.1 but the overhead & code will be quite complex.
LOL! Now what do i say to this! Im speechless!gx_saurav said:If it wasen't for MS u would still be having 6 years old technology in your onboard GPU. MS just raised the bar for onboard GFX to give better out of the box features for DX 9c & 10 along with hardware acceleration of Videos & what not using the GPU & DirectShow.
lets try running xp on a 486 and see how productive it can be ....abhinandh said:then what if someone creates an os requiring 2 sli gfx cards as min req and he tells that he has raised the bar??
what about pc's used just for internet and chatting.do the need 1gb ram ,a dedicated gfx card???what has vista got for them???
ans: a crappy blue interface which sucks and is worse than xp.
QwertyManiac said:gx_saurav - Where do you connect your monitor? Up your a*s? I'm sorry, I must say the brain instead.
Dude, this is what MS does, it gives you false impression. they say.. oh.. it will work on this and this.. when it plainly and simply and practically just don't work on that! Even on better hardware which runs 9.0c!kalpik said:In other words complexity is too much for DX 8.1 to handle.. Which means it _cant_ be achieved in DX 8.1. So please dont twist the truth.
iMav said:lets try running xp on a 486 and see how productive it can be ....
PS: for ur ignorant general knowledge u can theme the basic vista too vishal bhai .... yeh lin boys ko aap ke kaam ke baare malum nahi yaar ... sorry yaar
its not MS fault that u cant do ur job every1 has problems while working if u cant handle it just quit dont blame some 1 else for ur incompetenceHelp~Is~Here said:we're not fools like the one's who think they have more common sense than IT manager swearing at MS for the crappy update situation!
iMav said:its not MS fault that u cant do ur job every1 has problems while working if u cant handle it just quit dont blame some 1 else for ur incompetence
Isnt this what this thread is all about? Oh im sooooooooo sorry for being on topic I also demanded some proof from GX (or if you can prove what he said..).iMav said:@kalpik: the only comment u have here is that aero cant run on dinosaur machines where as beryl can ... anything else
Point proved.. Main batata hun kya kar.. Please STOP defending MS in each and every reply of yours.. If you dont have anything productive to contribute to the thread, please dont post!iMav said:ya so it doesnt work kya karun .... bhangra ...
Please dont make me laugh so much! My ribs hurt (really, im seeing a doctor for that!).iMav said:its much more than what windows blind (beryl alternative for windows) is ....