u two go to some vacations...
man...
you are thinking we are nerds who are spending the new year hunting the net for more info...
EDIT: errrmm, you are actually true.
Last edited:
u two go to some vacations...
lol that's weird. What's next? Millwall and Longhorn?The lineup begins with "Wimbledon", an ultra high-end mGPU. It has a 256-bit wide high-speed GDDR5 memory interface, 2-4 GB of dedicated memory, and 65W TDP. The DirectX 11 GPU will be about 25% faster than "Blackcomb", the Mobility HD 6000 series flagship. This is slated for Q2-2012. Next up is the high-end "Heathrow" mGPU, which has a 192-bit or 128-bit (selectable between variants) GDDR5 memory interface, 1-3 GB of dedicated memory, up to 45W TDP, and 30% higher performance compared to "Chelsea". This is slated for Q4-2011 (this should tell you that Radeon HD 7000 series will be in existence towards the end of 2011).
Going down, there's "Chelsea" itself, with its 128-bit GDDR5 memory interface, 1-2 GB memory, 20-30W TDP, performance 30% higher than "Whistler", production starting in Q4-2011. Lastly, there's "Thames". This mainstream mGPU will have 128-bit GDDR5 with option of GDDR3, 1 GB memory, 15-20W TDP, and 100% higher performance than "Seymour", Radeon HD 6000 series' mainstream mGPU. Production for this starts in Q4-2011, as well.
In case of radeon vliw4 in 69xx series has a special function unit cutoff and not a breakthrough in architectural improvement.
and u mean this is an architectural improvement? stop posting like a fanboy.Gtx 5xx and 4xx are not same. There are significant differences. FP16 texture filtering happens in one clock cycle, just as it does on the GF104 found in GeForce GTX 460, and not the two cycles endured by GF100.
FUD.They won't scale in multigpu setups like their 2gb counter parts. And GTX560 is far from defeat. It will have better tricks up its sleeve. Maybe amd sensed this.
*img151.imageshack.us/img151/8529/46306145.th.pngYou being an AMD FANBOY will always deny this no matter what.
my whole point is about cooking up of things. u cooked up CUDA without realzing what it is...If you don't care about technical mumbojumbo then don't argue please. Post something relevent to prove your points.
i actually want THIS to be right GTX 560 should be faster.well fudzilla like to call gtx 560 gtx 475 instead so vicky maybe right about 560 being faster than 6950 as it will be between 470 and 570.
According to the grapevine, the chip is based on the same GF104 chip used in its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 460, but using the full allocation of 384 stream processors, rather than the 336 found in the GTX 460.
The clock speeds also represent a significant boost over its predecessor, and could help the GPU hit the performance levels it needs to seriously compete with the Radeon HD 6950.
i actually want THIS to be right GTX 560 should be faster.
but my whole point is him bigging up gtx 5xx as a new architecutral improvement etc. etc. over Fermi and smalling the new VLIW4 architechture of AMD and saying it is mere a unit cut off when he hardly has any idea about it.
he was bigging up CUDA before & it just got raped by Stream and quicksync.