Insurance hai na. Tension nahi hai.BSNL Chaupla exchange catches fire, locals panic - The Times of India
I guess someone got fed up with 2Mbps gimmick, and wanted to teach them a lesson!![]()
My comment was WRT to cutting down expenses and being strict. It's not only about removing corrupt officials but resurrecting their whole staff. Also i am not overestimating ACT, they contribute by 30% to so called 2mbps national average.I think you are waay overestimating ACT. The only way it will work if they remove the corrupted top brass.
Got a source for that? I doubt their customer base would be that huge.Insurance hai na. Tension nahi hai.
My comment was WRT to cutting down expenses and being strict. It's not only about removing corrupt officials but resurrecting their whole staff. Also i am not overestimating ACT, they contribute by 40% to so called 2mbps national average.
i am on bb combo uld 845 i get 1mbps till 6gb not 12gb wtf is this
- - - Updated - - -
post the damn letter mods we want to see this, personally i would visit every broadband thread and spread the word of this shitty fup limit.
just give us 2mbps unlimited for 1000 including taxes
BSNL led broadband subscriber segment with 1.87 crore subscribers, followed by Airtel with 1.82 crore, Vodafone 1.56, Idea Cellular 1.23 crore and RCom 67.7 lakh
ACT presently has a gratifying 1 million+ subscribers
Got a source for that? I doubt their customer base would be that huge.
This exactly opposes the claim. This means that BSNL has more data delivered to it(chart sorted by total data consumption) even with lower speed compared to the higher speed ACT. The only one that could theoretically have more customers is Airtel as we do not know the exact data consumption amount. Simply speaking this chart proves BSNL has the highest or second highest customer base among steam gamers in all over India.*s19.postimg.org/6sud2u8v7/Capture.png
He claimed that ACT contributes by 30% - that's pretty much correct. Also note that Steam detects ACT and Beam Cable as different networks.This exactly opposes the claim. This means that BSNL has more data delivered to it(chart sorted by total data consumption) even with lower speed compared to the higher speed ACT. The only one that could theoretically have more customers is Airtel as we do not know the exact data consumption amount. Simply speaking this chart proves BSNL has the highest or second highest customer base among steam gamers in all over India.
If ACT had more customers they would top the chart with their high download amount.
That's the issue isn't it? There are no specifics.He claimed that ACT contributes by 30% - that's pretty much correct. Also note that Steam detects ACT and Beam Cable as different networks.
BSNL does have the highest subscriber count. But the question is does it generate the highest network traffic in India?
every Indian isp need to pay charges at these cable landing stations,traffic rates within India are relatively very cheap.NIB is bsnl's internal network & has nothing to do with bandwidth reselling.even bsnl has to pay fees at these cable landing stations.The other big problem is charges related to cable-landing stations. These are the points at which submarine cables enter and exit the mainland, and the owners of such stations often impose hefty fees for allowing ISP traffic to pass in or out. There are 10 such stations, but the market is dominated by two players, Bharti Airtel and Tata Communications, which together have a 93% market share.
Govt should nationalize the undersea cables and make it a fair play. Not that it will be fair to the companies owning the cables. That's how tata makes up for their pi$$ poor docomo which I doubt makes any profit. Airtel on the other hand squeezes every ounce of profit out of all its holdings.Bandwidth prices: Why we pay more for internet services - Page 2 - timesofindia-economictimes
Then it will result in Oligopoly. Ever wonder why Vodafone and Airtel data plans mimic each other very closely.you can not nationalize undersea cables,why do you think net is still neutral.instead govt should open bsnl landline network to pvt players to hire for providing broadband services.
Who do you think pays for their investments? Also reliance does not have much stake in undersea cables, that price gate will be there. With JIO FUP will be there, but at much high amount. I'm more worried about latency and contention ratio.I think many guys took it seriously ie. about THIS POST ..
However, on serious note, this time thread is very informative .
I am in view that nothing will change unless there is a real good PAN India player and currently only hope is JIO, with there Fiber Cable network being dug everywhere, I am sure that they will push hard for data services.
Who do you think pays for their investments? Also reliance does not have much stake in undersea cables, that price gate will be there. With JIO FUP will be there, but at much high amount. I'm more worried about latency and contention ratio.