The Photography Thread

Then you might want to find other ways to utilize the crazy light gathering capabilities of the high ISO full frame and the fast lens. Night shots at the jetty? I'm sure the boats are lit up. Street photography at night
Not actually. The only reason I use 1.8 is depth of field for portraits, in fact I mostly work at 100 ISO anyways. One more thing to consider is that A7ii has a traditional CMOS sensor, whereas A7Rii/iii have BSI sensor, which is more optimized for low light photography. And I would say, going from APS-C to Full frame is nothing phenomenal; it all comes down to the photographer than the camera - and to some extent, the lens. I'm quite happy with the bokeh this lens has:
*farm5.staticflickr.com/4621/39109857764_f1433ebb42_n.jpg_DSC0255 by Siddharth Tomar, on Flickr
 
Last edited:

izzikio_rage

Technomancer
The bokeh is pretty cool.

I would love to get a full frame just to get the following type of images with zero noise. This is at f/4.5 at some 100mm

*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180126/d5173b0f97a77c4601e64532fad74146.jpg
 
The bokeh is pretty cool.

I would love to get a full frame just to get the following type of images with zero noise. This is at f/4.5 at some 100mm

Well, then you would need to buy an expensive full frame like A7Sii or A7rii, because A7ii has similar noise characteristics as A6000 (probably because of same sensor tech).
 

sujoyp

Grand Master
With great camera comes equally expensive lenses - said someone once :chinscratch:

Full frame is really cheap to get if bought used...a superb 5DMK2 can be bought for as low as 50k ..but the lenses are just too costly .
maybe it can be compensated with old lenses.
 

CRACING

Journeyman
Lunar Eclipse, taken from my house terrace. It was difficult to get sharp moon. Phase detection is somewhat accurate but contrast-detection in live view keeps hunting. Manual focusing takes more time and patience. Taken on Nikon D5300, AF-P 70-300mm Lens, Tripod and Remote.

*i.imgur.com/iIE46Og.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 1 Sec | ISO: 400

*i.imgur.com/jaagbiO.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 2 Sec | ISO: 400

*i.imgur.com/fuTl3mp.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 1/2 Sec | ISO: 400

*i.imgur.com/WYvFWK3.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 1/320 Sec | ISO: 500
 

sujoyp

Grand Master
Good amlan.. i could see it in mumbai...went to roof but found nothing.

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4651/25136329707_55f0e2fa46_z.jpgDue Beach by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4770/25136329527_3b44d3f194_z.jpgSunset by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4768/25136328647_fe7bea0066_z.jpgLion by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4662/39975483922_ca5d755865_z.jpgFox2 by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4672/39297622434_5625531e8a_z.jpgLeopard2 by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4769/39975480262_5048498286_z.jpgLeopard1 by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr
 

nac

Aspiring Novelist
I would love to get a full frame just to get the following type of images with zero noise. This is at f/4.5 at some 100mm
You generally tend to shoot or at least the ones you post here are high ISO photographs aka low light photographs. I don't think FF is maaaaassively better in low light. May be a couple of stops better not more.
Lunar Eclipse, taken from my house terrace. It was difficult to get sharp moon. Phase detection is somewhat accurate but contrast-detection in live view keeps hunting. Manual focusing takes more time and patience.
Setting at infinity or back off a little bit after setting at infinity should do. I don't know why it was tough for you.
The last two don't have much contrast despite shooting with the same lens. Is it the way the light? Kinda hazy. I was thinking "did he shot those two with his Sigma?"
 

sujoyp

Grand Master
You generally tend to shoot or at least the ones you post here are high ISO photographs aka low light photographs. I don't think FF is maaaaassively better in low light. May be a couple of stops better not more.

Setting at infinity or back off a little bit after setting at infinity should do. I don't know why it was tough for you.

The last two don't have much contrast despite shooting with the same lens. Is it the way the light? Kinda hazy. I was thinking "did he shot those two with his Sigma?"
No no it was due to afternoon bright light..also i was not using lens cover..coz no room in the bus..maybe thats the eeason2

Sent from my LG-G6 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: nac

izzikio_rage

Technomancer
Missed the wildlife shots Sujoy. Great ones

I shoot a lot of low light shots, hence many of them come out at ISO 3200 types. The sony nex6 is pretty good at it, but from what people tell me full frames are amazing
 

sujoyp

Grand Master
Missed the wildlife shots Sujoy. Great ones

I shoot a lot of low light shots, hence many of them come out at ISO 3200 types. The sony nex6 is pretty good at it, but from what people tell me full frames are amazing
Thanks amlan.
Yes for shooting low light nothing compares to full frame + prime lens

Sent from my LG-G6 using Tapatalk
 

CRACING

Journeyman
Setting at infinity or back off a little bit after setting at infinity should do. I don't know why it was tough for you.

Even I don't know what happened that day but it happened quickly. All the neighbors had come on my house terrace to see the moon and were chitchatting. I was so confused. :???:

The blue Moon is too dark to focus properly and city dust pollution makes the visibility worst. I guess either slow shutter speed caused the blur (even though I have used sturdy tripod and remote) or the wind.

On normal moon phases, I have taken near sharp photos using AF and handheld.

*i.imgur.com/8Zi97PV.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 1/500 Sec | ISO: 1600

*i.imgur.com/yFZYxmk.jpg
Aperture: f/6.3 | Shutter Speed: 1/500 Sec | ISO: 400
 
  • Like
Reactions: nac

sujoyp

Grand Master
My Prewedding shoot test shoot. Will remove the pic after a week :)

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4714/26225286168_66dbf455b5_c.jpgTrail shoot by Sujoy Packrasy, on Flickr
 
  • Like
Reactions: nac

izzikio_rage

Technomancer
Awesome, check out google for pre wedding shoot poses, ideas and props. Carry stuff to make it look more fun (guitar, rings, card, chalk boards)

Some suggestions off the net. *uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/37bb4d48824c10bee1cb8c571531d7ce.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/03f45a7b0e1f2aeaf526754b0f42862f.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/2a3d3af92e7b02f9920ed27e10d77ec7.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/f9e9b59bd6baaf057ca02e426d29a8bb.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/3825a3ff7d94dfd7c0a49eaa22c793c5.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/f7f3ad04a0bf4d925e52be5d7a43aba2.jpg
 

sujoyp

Grand Master
Awesome, check out google for pre wedding shoot poses, ideas and props. Carry stuff to make it look more fun (guitar, rings, card, chalk boards)

Some suggestions off the net. *uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/37bb4d48824c10bee1cb8c571531d7ce.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/03f45a7b0e1f2aeaf526754b0f42862f.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/2a3d3af92e7b02f9920ed27e10d77ec7.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/f9e9b59bd6baaf057ca02e426d29a8bb.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/3825a3ff7d94dfd7c0a49eaa22c793c5.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180207/f7f3ad04a0bf4d925e52be5d7a43aba2.jpg
Yaah my friend is already getting many things.lets see

Sent from my LG-G6 using Tapatalk
 
I'm quite out of loop with forum, thesis and stuff. Oh, and some random pictures of stockholm here and there with a 85mm lens.

*farm5.staticflickr.com/4610/39518566344_78b260a523_n.jpg_DSC0365 by Siddharth Tomar, on Flickr
 

izzikio_rage

Technomancer
Been trying to get better at my compositions over time. Please suggest if there are tutorials that you've seen/read and liked *uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180216/e94bdc41916daa47c2b855c90e5c0262.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180216/55aef61e8fb97e20adb356b465901b8a.jpg
 
Top Bottom