Lunar Eclipse - Apr '15
About two min interval for about 15 minutes long. 7 images stacked and PPed...
*i102.photobucket.com/albums/m108/tkphotos1/lunar-ecl-tilt_zpseejn0zyh.jpg
SX130 | f/5.6 | 1/13 sec | F 308mm eq. | ISO 80
[MENTION=89408]criztle[/MENTION] your 3rd one is nice...I like soft colors of that pic
[MENTION=221001]Pranav[/MENTION] I have CPL ...donno how to use it effectively.
out of your pics composition of common tiger is correct...others composition is not good..colors are good
1st one butterfly is out of focus
Lunar Eclipse - Apr '15
About two min interval for about 15 minutes long. 7 images stacked and PPed...
*i102.photobucket.com/albums/m108/tkphotos1/lunar-ecl-tilt_zpseejn0zyh.jpg
SX130 | f/5.6 | 1/13 sec | F 308mm eq. | ISO 80
Both the photographs are nice.After following this thread for a while, I think little constructive criticism won't hurt.
This are old ones, since my camera is out of service and I have switched to cell temporarily.
[MENTION=39722]sujoyp[/MENTION] [MENTION=125321]nac[/MENTION] Thanks, I think monochromes help in two things; highlighting the subject and hiding imperfections.Thanks everyone.
Both the photographs are nice.
I like the black and white more. I guess the monochrome variant and PP makes it look good. Good work there
[MENTION=39722]sujoyp[/MENTION] [MENTION=125321]nac[/MENTION] Thanks, I think monochromes help in two things; highlighting the subject and hiding imperfections.
Here are more; (And this will effectively end the contribution from my NEX-6 on this thread, I will be making a switch to Olympus soon)
[MENTION=125321]nac[/MENTION] nice shot..but didnt you get the red moon...that I saw in newspapers
[MENTION=221001]Pranav[/MENTION] 1st is OOF and focus seems to be on flower
2nd you cut one of the part of butterfly and butterfly dont look nice without a habitat...a macro pic of butterfly is of no use...butterfly will look really good with green natural BG
parrot is really beautiful in color but its face is opposite side...
[MENTION=285113]sidharth[/MENTION] 1st one is good...
Yeah, I have done it few time to hide the imperfectionI think monochromes help in two things; highlighting the subject and hiding imperfections.
Encrusted
That's the reddest I got. I was arguing with my friends all day that we can't see this eclipse from India. It's happening during day time.. So I wasn't planning to take this photograph. May be it was little more red when it was in horizon. It was already 7 when we saw the moon and still I was saying that it's not eclipse, it could be clouds It took 15-20 min to reach home and grab our camera. And by the time we shoot, it moved well above the horizon.@nac nice shot..but didnt you get the red moon...that I saw in newspapers
Thanks guys...
Yeah, I have done it few time to hide the imperfection
Would you mind telling how the lighting was done for "encrusted". Though the other are similar to this one, but for this the light seems like lit inside the flower. It's the lighting, right? or is it PP?
That's the reddest I got. I was arguing with my friends all day that we can't see this eclipse from India. It's happening during day time.. So I wasn't planning to take this photograph. May be it was little more red when it was in horizon. It was already 7 when we saw the moon and still I was saying that it's not eclipse, it could be clouds It took 15-20 min to reach home and grab our camera. And by the time we shoot, it moved well above the horizon.
Wow!!! Thank you. Thanks for explaining.A tricky question to answer. The shot was taken at evening with with bounce flash to completely darken the background in question(the ceiling partially helped in this). Second, the inherent color of flower helped me too. Whereas the outer part had a really dark shade, inner part was extremely light and reflective and accepted flash without much trouble. This extreme difference in gradient helped me to create a "glowing" look.