Suggest me a good Graphics card for my Intel dg31pr

[Ankit07]

HD5670 is lot faster than GT440 & still cost less.



well this depends on the user totally. one can change it before plugging in a GPU or after it gives out smoke, damage your hard drive & blows up a few capacitors of your motherboard

PS: HD5670 is more powerful, have lower TDP & is cheaper.

Gt 440 is 20%+ faster than hd 5670 with a better architecture!

Info on google searched websites like guru3D is wrong!

U can check urself frame rate of both cards

I can explain this in more detail if u want

Its not ndcessary that costly card is better

For eg at the time of release gtx 570 cost 20k while gtx 580 cost 28k!

And gtx 580 is around 10% faster than gtx 570

 

[skeletor]

Gt 440 is 20%+ faster than hd 5670 with a better architecture!

Info on google searched websites like guru3D is wrong!

U can check urself frame rate of both cards

I can explain this in more detail if u want

No, it isn't.

*tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GT_440/images/perfrel_1680.gif

 

[Ankit07]

Also to note that latest series cards have better architecture & cheaper too

Gt 440 will give 3x frames rates compared to hd 5670 in tessellation guaranteed!

 

[Ankit07]

No, it isn't.

*tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GT_440/images/perfrel_1680.gif

Do u wan me to explain in detail?

I m typing from from mobile

That benchmark is wrong!

 

[Ankit07]

okay!

9600 GT is faster than HD 4670 this u all know.. check out benchmarks!

Specs:-

HD 4670 got 320 stream processers which are clocked at 750MHz!

HD 5670 got 400 stream processing units with a core clock of 775 MHz!

hd 5670 is around 25% to 28% faster than hd 4670

on other hand a normal 9600 gt got 64 cores clocked at 600 MHz core clock

while GT 440 got 96 shaders clocked at 800 MHz core clock!

GT 440 is already 50% faster than 9600 GT in case of stream processors with a 200 MHz increase of of core clock

u can calculate total increase of performance by urself!

 

[Cilus]

Ankit07, all the claims made by you are completely baseless without any proof. Every bechmark and every review sites are wrong and you are the all knowing Genious here....If that is your claim then probably TDF is not the right place for you. And regarding architecture thing....New is always better....Then GT 430 should be better than GTX 260.....which is again not true. And regarding Stream processor thing...you got it all wrong.

Show us any review sites or benchmark results where HD 5670 is getting beaten by a GT 440. Damm..GT 440 is actually slower than Nvidia's own previous gen Graphics card GT 240 GDDR5 version, previously occupying that price range.

 

[coderunknown]

Also to note that latest series cards have better architecture & cheaper too

explain this better architecture part. please.

Gt 440 will give 3x frames rates compared to hd 5670 in tessellation guaranteed!

should i lol? next up you'll bring in PhysX & then general processing. you know what GT440 is? its an entry level GPU. means its slow. yes it may offer 3X better frames in tessellation but it doesn't matter cause nobody likes playing games at slideshow FPS.

*images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4278/36848.png

GT440 is missing but it won't be lot faster than GT430. yes, in terms of tessellation it'll match HD5670 for sure. but look at HD6670. moreover its never about tessellation all the time. in simple terms, you can't play games on an entry level GPU turns all bells & whistles to their max.

That benchmark is wrong!

okay!

9600 GT is faster htan HD 4670 this u all know.. check out benchmarks!

Specs:-

HD 4670 got 320 stream processers which are clocked at 750MHz!

HD 5670 got 400 stream processing units with a core clock of 775 MHz!

hd 5670 is around 25% to 28% faster than hd 4670

on other hand a normal 9600 gt got 64 cores clocked at 600 MHz core clock

while GT 440 got 96 shaders clocked at 800 MHz core clock!

GT 440 is already 50% faster than 9600 GT in case of stream processors with a 200 MHz increase of of core clock

u can calculate total increase of performance by urself!

sorry but i have to say you joke a lot. you talk about architecture & now you are simply comparing a G94 GPU to a GF108 GPU clock to clock & SP to SP

 

[Ankit07]

Ankit07, all the claims made by you are completely baseless without any proof. Every bechmark and every review sites are wrong and you are the all knowing Genious here....If that is your claim then probably TDF is not the right place for you. And regarding architecture thing....New is always better....Then GT 430 should be better than GTX 260.....which is again not true. And regarding Stream processor thing...you got it all wrong.

Show us any review sites or benchmark results where HD 5670 is getting beaten by a GT 440. Damm..GT 440 is actually slower than Nvidia's own previous gen Graphics card GT 240 GDDR5 version, previously occupying that price range.

Buy both HD 5670 & GT 440 check them both in ur system by urself then tell us

and i told about architecture improvement but u are comparing other old higher end cards with current generation lower end cards LOL

 

[skeletor]

Do u wan me to explain in detail?

I m typing from from mobile

That benchmark is wrong!

I don't need any sort of explanation, mate. That wasn't a benchmark. More like an average conclusion after all the benchmarks.

Regarding *tesellation* - no game is using excessive tessellation. Synthetic benchmarks based on that are useless. Real world performance in games i.e. the frame rate in games is all that matters.

Just read this review.

ASUS GeForce GT 440 1 GB Review - Page 1/30 | techPowerUp

or simply, the hierarchy chart over here:

Graphics Card Hierarchy Chart : Best Graphics Cards For The Money: October 2011

HD 5670 and 9600 GT both are faster than GT 440, lol.

 

[Ankit07]

Spoiler

explain this better architecture part. please.



should i lol? next up you'll bring in PhysX & then general processing. you know what GT440 is? its an entry level GPU. means its slow. yes it may offer 3X better frames in tessellation but it doesn't matter cause nobody likes playing games at slideshow FPS.

*images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4278/36848.png

GT440 is missing but it won't be lot faster than GT430. yes, in terms of tessellation it'll match HD5670 for sure. but look at HD6670. moreover its never about tessellation all the time. in simple terms, you can't play games on an entry level GPU turns all bells & whistles to their max.







sorry but i have to say you joke a lot. you talk about architecture & now you are simply comparing a G94 GPU to a GF108 GPU clock to clock & SP to SP

do u wanna say GF 108 cores weak compared to G94

 

[skeletor]

do u wanna say GF 108 cores weak compared to G94

NO.

He has said that GT 440 as a card is slower than GT 240 in games.

I won't be getting into architectural differences as it is most likely to go over the top for you.

Read this chart: Graphics Card Hierarchy Chart : Best Graphics Cards For The Money: October 2011

 

[Joker]

LOL Ankit07

this forum is not ur "nvidia rocks" backyard. since u have joined this forum, time to educate yourself. only things which have performance merit and overall merit will get recommended over here. we dont care if it is AMD/ATI, Intel or nvidia.

i can tell u where u can begin with.

How do I determine the performance of a graphic card? Video memory (VRAM)? Memory width? Core frequency?
None of these. The foolproof way to determine the performance of a graphic card is by looking at the frames-per-second delivered by it in games. So, check out reviews on websites like HardOCP, HardwareCanucks, Anandtech, Tomshardware et cetera.

*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/graphic-c...ormation-regarding-graphic-cards-newbies.html
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/graphic-cards/151004-best-graphic-cards-money-india.html
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/graphic-cards/149373-read-me-before-asking-question-section.html

+1 to ICO, Cilus and Sam.

 

[topgear]

@ Ankit07 - looks like you are confident about GT440s performance so most probably you have a GT440 - right ? - if yes why not run 3DMark 11 and Unigine Heaven 2.5 and show us the result

 

[Ankit07]

@ Ankit07 - looks like you are confident about GT440s performance so most probably you have a GT440 - right ? - if yes why not run 3DMark 11 and Unigine Heaven 2.5 and show us the result

I dont have gt 440

 

[topgear]

^^ ok .....

@ OP - you have a budget of max 10k so you can easily get a HD6770 @ ~7k and a corsair cx430v2 PSU @ 2.4k

 

[skeletor]

I dont have gt 440

Then why talk shite?

I guess enough has been said. Thread locked. OP can start a new thread if he needs to know more.